Literature DB >> 29349584

[Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in geriatrics : Indications, technique and complications].

Rainer Wirth1.   

Abstract

The technique of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) was introduced in 1979 as a semi-invasive approach for children with the need for a gastric fistula in order to avoid an operative intervention. The suture pull-through method was rapidly established and is now omnipresent. Because scientific evidence is broadly missing, there is some uncertainty about the indications in geriatric medicine. Guidelines do not recommend the insertion of a PEG in patients with severe dementia and malnutrition. Tube feeding is mainly recommended as a temporary method for patients who cannot take oral nutrition for more than 3 days or for whom the energy intake for more than 10 days presumably covers less than 50% of their needs, assuming that the overall prognosis is reasonable. Insertion of a PEG is only recommended if artificial nutrition is expected to be necessary for more than 3-4 weeks or if a nasogastric tube is not tolerated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dementia; Geriatrics; Malnutrition; Mortality; Tube feeding

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29349584     DOI: 10.1007/s00391-017-1363-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr        ISSN: 0948-6704            Impact factor:   1.281


  26 in total

Review 1.  ESPEN guidelines on artificial enteral nutrition--percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).

Authors:  Chr Löser; G Aschl; X Hébuterne; E M H Mathus-Vliegen; M Muscaritoli; Y Niv; H Rollins; P Singer; R H Skelly
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.324

Review 2.  Use of tube feeding to prevent aspiration pneumonia.

Authors:  T E Finucane; J P Bynum
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-23       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  ESPEN guideline on ethical aspects of artificial nutrition and hydration.

Authors:  Christiane Druml; Peter E Ballmer; Wilfred Druml; Frank Oehmichen; Alan Shenkin; Pierre Singer; Peter Soeters; Arved Weimann; Stephan C Bischoff
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 7.324

4.  Survival after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in older persons.

Authors:  S L Mitchell; J M Tetroe
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 5.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric feeding in older individuals with non-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review.

Authors:  M H Jaafar; S Mahadeva; K Morgan; M P Tan
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.075

6.  Drainage Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy for Malignant Bowel Obstruction in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Prognosis and Implications for Timing of Palliative Intervention.

Authors:  Kerry-Ann Pinard; Tabitha N Goring; Barbara C Egan; Douglas J Koo
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  Comparison of 231 patients receiving either "pull-through" or "push" percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Gernot Köhler; Veronika Kalcher; Oliver O Koch; Ruzica-R Luketina; Klaus Emmanuel; Georg Spaun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia.

Authors:  B Reisberg; S H Ferris; M J de Leon; T Crook
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Does feeding tube insertion and its timing improve survival?

Authors:  Joan M Teno; Pedro L Gozalo; Susan L Mitchell; Sylvia Kuo; Ramona L Rhodes; Julie P W Bynum; Vincent Mor
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Guideline clinical nutrition in patients with stroke.

Authors:  Rainer Wirth; Christine Smoliner; Martin Jäger; Tobias Warnecke; Andreas H Leischker; Rainer Dziewas
Journal:  Exp Transl Stroke Med       Date:  2013-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.