| Literature DB >> 29348775 |
Nkosinathi David Cele1, Nonhlakanipho Felicia Sangweni1, Rebamang Anthony Mosa1, Dambudzo Penduka1, Geraldine Genevive Lazarus2, Moganavelli Singh2, Godfrey Elijah Zharare3, Andy Rowland Opoku1.
Abstract
The traditional use of medicinal plants in the management of sexual dysfunctions has a long history. This study investigated testicular dysfunction ameliorative effect of the methanolic roots extracts of Maytenus procumbens and Ozoroa paniculosa in a butanol-induced testicular dysfunction rat model. The rats in respective experimental groups were orally administered with the extract at 50 and 250 mg/kg bw, daily for 28 days. The cytotoxicity of the extracts was evaluated against HEK293, MCF-7, and HT29 cell lines. The extracts exhibited moderate (LC50 30.3-330.2 μg/mL) to weak (LC50 200.8-438.4 μg/mL) cytotoxicity level on the cancer and normal cells, respectively. While relatively lower serum testosterone levels and total sperm count along with decreased numbers of spermatogonia were noted in the untreated group, all these parameters were improved in the groups treated with the extracts at 250 mg/kg. Improved histomorphological changes of the testes were also observed when compared to the untreated group. While the extracts (at 250 mg/kg) increased serum reduced glutathione content and decreased malondialdehyde content, a relatively higher serum creatinine level was also observed in the treated animals group. The results indicate that the two plant extracts have potential to ameliorate testicular dysfunction.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29348775 PMCID: PMC5734007 DOI: 10.1155/2017/8204816
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Phytochemical analysis of M. procumbens and O. paniculosa roots.
| Phytochemical |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Terpenoids | ++ | + |
| Saponins | ++ | + |
| Flavonoids | − | ++ |
| Alkaloids | + | − |
| Steroids | − | + |
| Tannins | ++ | − |
| Anthraquinones | ++ | + |
| cardiac glycosides | ++ | ++ |
| TPC (mg/g) | 0.083 ± 0.004 | 0.063 ± 0.001 |
| FC (mg/g) | 0.00 ± 0.000 | 0.102 ± 0.003 |
++ indicated high concentration was recorded if a definite heavy precipitate observed. + indicates low concentration was recorded if the reagent produces only slight opaqueness. – indicates not detected.
LC50 (µg/ml) values of M. procumbens and O. paniculosa against HEK, MCF-7, and HT29 cells.
| Extracts | HEK 293 cells | MCF-7 cells | HT29 cells |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 438.4 ± 38.4 | 330.2 ± 21.2 | 80.0 ± 28.9 |
|
| 356.1 ± 14.4 | 230.3 ± 27.9 | 30.3 ± 7.5 |
Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Effect ofthe extracts on serum levels of creatinine, AST, and ALT.
| Group | Creatinine | AST | ALT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 16 ± 2.58 | 164 ± 8.04 | 71 ± 6.39 |
| Untreated | 16 ± 2.95 | 181 ± 12.02 | 83 ± 2.79 |
| Sildenafil (20 mg/kg) | 30 ± 2.34 | 149 ± 14.84 | 76 ± 7.60 |
|
| 21 ± 0.47 | 175 ± 19.32 | 62 ± 1.65 |
|
| 27 ± 0.70 | 136 ± 5.42 | 54 ± 0.70 |
|
| 21 ± 1.25 | 150 ± 23.85 | 72 ± 1.73 |
|
| 34 ± 2.31 | 155 ± 3.90 | 58 ± 3.59 |
Data were expressed as mean ± SD, n = 5. p < 0.05 versus untreated group.
Effect of the extracts on serum levels of SOD, CAT, GSH, and MDA in the testicular dysfunction induced rats.
| Group | SOD | CAT | GSH | MDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 18.9 ± 0.08 | 6.13 ± 0.02 | 7.3 ± 0.04 | 0.08 ± 0.01 |
| Untreated | 16.2 ± 0.02 | 3.37 ± 0.00 | 4.4 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.02 |
| Sildenafil (20 mg/kg) | 13.3 ± 0.01 | 3.33 ± 0.00 | 4.9 ± 0.03 | 0.14 ± 0.01 |
|
| 12.8 ± 0.00 | 3.36 ± 0.09 | 6.8 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.04 |
|
| 9.6 ± 0.00 | 3.01 ± 0.04 | 9.8 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.01 |
|
| 10.6 ± 0.00 | 3.73 ± 0.00 | 3.2 ± 0.06 | 0.06 ± 0.02 |
|
| 11.1 ± 0.07 | 4.27 ± 0.05 | 5.4 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.00 |
Data were expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 5. p < 0.05 versus untreated group.
Effects of plant extracts on body weight, testicular weight, serum testosterone levels, total sperm count, and mounting frequency.
| Group | BWC (g) | TW (g) | Testosterone (nmol/L) | TSC (104) | MF (per 30 min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 49 ± 16.26 | 3.40 ± 0.48 | 6.99 ± 3.09 | 47 ± 05.81 | 19 ± 1.02 |
| Untreated | 39 ± 16.23 | 2.76 ± 0.08 | 3.01 ± 2.82 | 35 ± 07.94 | 09 ± 1.00 |
| Sildenafil (20 mg/kg) | 50 ± 15.44 | 3.55 ± 0.41 | 14.93 ± 8.34 | 37 ± 05.92 | 64 ± 1.01 |
|
| 65 ± 17.47 | 3.33 ± 0.20 | 2.12 ± 1.54 | 53 ± 20.17 | 16 ± 3.09 |
|
| 97 ± 12.26 | 3.62 ± 0.62 | 6.60 ± 3.51 | 74 ± 10.56 | 18 ± 3.54 |
|
| 44 ± 11.60 | 4.21 ± 0.41 | 2.58 ± 0.71 | 46 ± 2.56 | 32 ± 3.11 |
|
| 48 ± 13.23 | 4.29 ± 0.11 | 10.95 ± 3.42 | 49 ± 14.13 | 46 ± 1.20 |
BWC: body weight change; TW: testicular weight; TSC: total sperm count; MF: mount frequency; M.p: Maytenus procumbens; O.p: Ozoroa paniculosa. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 5. p < 0.05 and p < 0.001 versus untreated group.
Figure 1Histological analysis of the testes. All specimens were prepared as 60 μm thick sections stained with haematoxylin and eosin. (a) Testis' cross section from normal control; (b) section from untreated testicular dysfunctional rats; (c) testicular dysfunctional rats treated with sildenafil (20 mg/kg); (d) testicular dysfunctional rats treated with M. procumbens (50 mg/kg); (e) testicular dysfunctional rats treated with M. procumbens (250 mg/kg); (f) testicular dysfunctional rats treated with O. paniculosa (50 mg/kg); (g) testicular dysfunctional rats treated with O. paniculosa (250 mg/kg). Magnification: ×200.