Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara1, Belen Pascual2, Gaia Rizzo3,4, Meixiang Yu2, Neha Pal2, David Beers2, Randall Carter5, Stanley H Appel2, Nazem Atassi6, Joseph C Masdeu2. 1. Nantz National Alzheimer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, and Weill Cornell Medicine, Houston, Texas pzanottifregonara@houstonmethodist.org. 2. Nantz National Alzheimer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, and Weill Cornell Medicine, Houston, Texas. 3. Invicro, London, United Kingdom. 4. Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. 5. GE Global Research, Schenectady, New York; and. 6. Neurological Clinical Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
18F-GE180 is a third-generation PET tracer for quantifying the translocator protein (TSPO), a biomarker for inflammation. The aim of this study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of 18F-GE180 and the well-established TSPO tracer 11C-PBR28 by scanning with both tracers during the same day in the same subjects. Methods: Five subjects underwent a 90-min PET scan with 11C-PBR28 in the morning and 18F-GE180 in the afternoon. A metabolite-corrected arterial input function was obtained in each subject for both tracers, and the brain uptake was quantified with a 2-tissue-compartment model. Results: The rate of metabolism of 18F-GE180 in arterial blood was slower than that of 11C-PBR28 (the percentages of nonmetabolized parent in plasma at 90 min were 74.9% ± 4.15% [mean ± SD] and 11.2% ± 1.90%, respectively). The plasma free fractions were similar for both tracers: 3.5% ± 1.1% for 18F-GE180 and 4.1% ± 1.1% for 11C-PBR28. The average total volume of distribution (VT) of 18F-GE180 was about 20 times smaller than that of 11C-PBR28 (0.15 ± 0.03 mL/cm3 for 18F-GE180 and 3.27 ± 0.66 mL/cm3 for 11C-PBR28). 18F-GE180 was characterized by poor transfer from the vascular compartment to the brain (its plasma-to-tissue rate constant [K1] was about 10 times smaller than that of 11C-PBR28). Moreover, kinetic modeling was more difficult with 18F-GE180, as its VT values were identified with a lower precision than those of 11C-PBR28 and outlying values were more frequent. Conclusion: The VT of 18F-GE180 was about 20 times smaller than that of 11C-PBR28 because of low penetration into the brain from the vascular compartment. In addition, kinetic modeling of 18F-GE180 was more challenging than that of 11C-PBR28. Therefore, compared with 11C-PBR28, 18F-GE180 had unfavorable characteristics for TSPO imaging of the brain.
18F-GE180 is a third-generation PET tracer for quantifying the translocator protein (TSPO), a biomarker for inflammation. The aim of this study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of 18F-GE180 and the well-established TSPO tracer 11C-PBR28 by scanning with both tracers during the same day in the same subjects. Methods: Five subjects underwent a 90-min PET scan with 11C-PBR28 in the morning and 18F-GE180 in the afternoon. A metabolite-corrected arterial input function was obtained in each subject for both tracers, and the brain uptake was quantified with a 2-tissue-compartment model. Results: The rate of metabolism of 18F-GE180 in arterial blood was slower than that of 11C-PBR28 (the percentages of nonmetabolized parent in plasma at 90 min were 74.9% ± 4.15% [mean ± SD] and 11.2% ± 1.90%, respectively). The plasma free fractions were similar for both tracers: 3.5% ± 1.1% for 18F-GE180 and 4.1% ± 1.1% for 11C-PBR28. The average total volume of distribution (VT) of 18F-GE180 was about 20 times smaller than that of 11C-PBR28 (0.15 ± 0.03 mL/cm3 for 18F-GE180 and 3.27 ± 0.66 mL/cm3 for 11C-PBR28). 18F-GE180 was characterized by poor transfer from the vascular compartment to the brain (its plasma-to-tissue rate constant [K1] was about 10 times smaller than that of 11C-PBR28). Moreover, kinetic modeling was more difficult with 18F-GE180, as its VT values were identified with a lower precision than those of 11C-PBR28 and outlying values were more frequent. Conclusion: The VT of 18F-GE180 was about 20 times smaller than that of 11C-PBR28 because of low penetration into the brain from the vascular compartment. In addition, kinetic modeling of 18F-GE180 was more challenging than that of 11C-PBR28. Therefore, compared with 11C-PBR28, 18F-GE180 had unfavorable characteristics for TSPO imaging of the brain.
Authors: Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Mattia Veronese; Belen Pascual; Robert C Rostomily; Federico Turkheimer; Joseph C Masdeu Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Sujata Sridharan; Joel Raffel; Ashwini Nandoskar; Chris Record; David J Brooks; David Owen; David Sharp; Paolo A Muraro; Roger Gunn; Richard Nicholas Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Kornelis S M van der Geest; Maria Sandovici; Pieter H Nienhuis; Riemer H J A Slart; Peter Heeringa; Elisabeth Brouwer; William F Jiemy Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-06-06
Authors: William C Kreisl; Min-Jeong Kim; Jennifer M Coughlin; Ioline D Henter; David R Owen; Robert B Innis Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Franziska J Vettermann; Stefanie Harris; Julia Schmitt; Marcus Unterrainer; Simon Lindner; Boris-Stephan Rauchmann; Carla Palleis; Endy Weidinger; Leonie Beyer; Florian Eckenweber; Sebastian Schuster; Gloria Biechele; Christian Ferschmann; Vladimir M Milenkovic; Christian H Wetzel; Rainer Rupprecht; Daniel Janowitz; Katharina Buerger; Robert Perneczky; Günter U Höglinger; Johannes Levin; Christian Haass; Joerg C Tonn; Maximilian Niyazi; Peter Bartenstein; Nathalie L Albert; Matthias Brendel Journal: Life (Basel) Date: 2021-05-26
Authors: Christin Y Sander; Stefano Bovo; Angel Torrado-Carvajal; Daniel Albrecht; Hongping Deng; Vitaly Napadow; Julie C Price; Jacob M Hooker; Marco L Loggia Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 6.960
Authors: Fabiola De Marchi; Ivana Munitic; Amedeo Amedei; James D Berry; Eva L Feldman; Eleonora Aronica; Giovanni Nardo; Donatienne Van Weehaeghe; Elena Niccolai; Nikolina Prtenjaca; Stacey A Sakowski; Caterina Bendotti; Letizia Mazzini Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2021-06-19 Impact factor: 9.052