| Literature DB >> 29347940 |
Pãmella A Macêdo-Sales1, Simone R L S Souto2, Carolina A Destefani3, Ricardo P Lucena3, Ricardo Luiz D Machado3, Marcia R Pinto3, Anderson M Rodrigues4, Leila M Lopes-Bezerra5, Elisabeth M S Rocha3, Andréa Regina S Baptista6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sporotrichosis is a neglected zoonosis caused by pathogenic fungi belonging to the Sporothrix schenckii complex. In Rio de Janeiro state, this disease reached an epidemic status with over 4700 domestic felines and around 4000 humans affected since the mid-90s. The present study evaluated clinical and epidemiological aspects and also the frequency of colonization and infection by these fungi in healthy cats and among those with suspicious cutaneous lesions, inhabiting four Rio de Janeiro state distinct areas.Entities:
Keywords: Cat (Felis catus); Neglected diseases; Sporotrichosis; Subcutaneous infection; Zoonosis
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29347940 PMCID: PMC5774141 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1340-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Map of the state of Rio de Janeiro highlighting the regions inhabited by the cats included in the present study. In each region, the absolute number of cats and groups to which they belong are depicted: CRG (Colonization Research Group), Negative Sporotrichosis Group (-SG) and Positive Sporotrichosis Group (+SG)
Absolute number and percentage (%) distribution of cats according to group and clinical-epidemiological variables
| Study populations | CRG | SSG | TOTAL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical-epidemiological variables | -SG | +SG | |||
| 175 | 92 | 104 | 371 | ||
| Age (mean in years) | 2.85 ± 2.8 | 4.45 ± 3.9 | 3.75 ± 3.1 | 3,51 ± 3,2 | |
| Male | 88 (50.3) | 41 (44.6) | 62 (59.6) | 191 (51,5) | 0,035ϯ |
| Neutering | 100 (57.1) | 52 (56.5) | 47 (45.2) | 199 (53,6) | 0,037* |
| Undefined Breed (UDB) | 129 (92.1) | 82 (95.3) | 92 (94.8) | 303 (93,8) | |
| Urban Area | 133 (76.0) | 78 (84.8) | 82 (78.8) | 293 (79,0) | |
| Contact with Soil/Plants | 145 (82.9) | 68 (73.9) | 75 (72.1) | 288 (77,6) | 0,034* |
| Contact with Animals | 164 (93.7) | 80 (87.0) | 76 (73.1) | 215 (57,9) | 0,0004* |
| Contact with Cats with Sporotrichosis | 59 (33.7) | 24 (26.1) | 40 (38.5) | 123 (33,2) | |
| Risk Event Prior to Lesion | n.a. | 28 (30.4) | 43 (41.3) | 71 (36,2) | |
CRG Colonization Research Group, SSG Sporotrichosis Suspicion Group, -SG Negative Sporotrichosis Group, +SG Positive Sporotrichosis Group
*p < 0.05 between CRG and +SG; Chi-square Test
ϯp < 0.05 between -SG and +SG; Chi-square Test
n.a.: not analyzed
Fig. 2Most commonly observed sporotrichosis cutaneous lesions in two infected domestic feline showing crust, ulceration, blood and pus in the cephalic region (a) and thoracic member (b)
Absolute number and percentage (%) of cats according to group and clinical variables
| Populations | +SG | –SG | OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Signs | ||||
| Respiratory Distress | 37 (35.6) | 24 (26.1) | ||
| Nasal Secretion | 51(49.0) | 33(35.9) | ||
| Sneezing | 65(62.5) | 36 (39.1) | 0.001 | 0.386 (0.217–0.687) |
| Lack of Appetite | 2 (1.9) | 3 (3.3) | ||
| Weight Loss | 27 (26.0) | 12 (13.0) | 0.024 | 0.428 (0.202–0.904) |
| Apathy | 20 (19.2) | 18 (19.6) | ||
| Ocular Secretion | 3 (2.9) | 2 (2.2) | ||
| Epistaxis | 5 (4.8) | 1 (1.1) | ||
| Macroscopic Aspect of Lesions | ||||
| Crust | 61 (58.7) | 41 (44.6) | 0.049 | 0.567 (0.321–0.999) |
| Peeling | 5 (4.8) | 8 (8.7) | ||
| Erythema | 31 (29.8) | 20 (21.7) | ||
| Ulceration | 77 (74.0) | 45 (48.9) | < 0.001 | 0.336 (0.184–0.611) |
| Presence of Pus | 31 (29.8) | 13 (14.1) | 0.009 | 0.388 (0.188–0.797) |
| Presence of Blood | 71 (68.3) | 39 (42.4) | < 0.001 | 0.342 (0.191–0.614) |
| Nodule | 38 (36.5) | 23 (25.0) | ||
| Depigmentation | 5 (4.8) | 1 (1.1) | ||
| Vesicle | 7 (6.7) | 2 (2.2) | ||
| Degree of Pruritus | ||||
| Absent | 29 (27.9) | 26 (28.3) | ||
| Mild | 24 (23.1) | 22 (23.9) | ||
| Moderate | 22 (21.2) | 11 (12.0) | ||
| Severe | 24 (23.1) | 23 (25.0) | ||
+SG Positive Sporotrichosis Group, -SG Negative Sporotrichosis Group
OR odds ratio
Frequency of colonization by Sporothrix in the three groups according to anatomical site
| Nail Fragments | Oral Cavity | Both Sites | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRG n = 175 (%) | 0 | 1 (0.57%) | 0 | 1 (057%) |
| -SG n = 92 (%) | 1(1.1%) | 2(2.1%) | 1(1.1%) | 4(4.3%) |
| +SG n = 104 (%) | 11(10.6%) | 12(11.5%) | 18(17.3%) | 41 (39.4%) |
CRG Colonization Research Group, +SG Positive Sporotrichosis Group, -SG Negative Sporotrichosis Group
Sporothrix isolation within different biological samples
| CRG (p/n) | +SG (p/n) | -SG (p/n) | Total (p/n) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nail Fragments | 0/174 | 29/86* | 2/80 | 31/340 |
| Oral Cavity | 1/66 | 30/66* | 3/57 | 34/190 |
CRG Colonization Research Group, +SG Positive Sporotrichosis Group, -SG Negative Sporotrichosis Group; p = positive
*Differences were not observed in colonization between oral cavity and nail fragments (χ2 = 2.158; p = 0.1418)
Scientific articles on Sporothrix colonization in cats from different Brazilian regions, including the present study
| Author/Year | Location | CRG (n) | +SG (n) | -SG (n) | Technique used to investigate the nails | Frequency of isolation in the nails (%) | Frequency of isolation in the oral cavity (%) | Frequency of isolation in the nasal cavity (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRG | +SG | -SG | CRG | +SG | -SG | CRG | +SG | -SG | ||||||
| Schubach et al. [ | Rio de Janeiro/RJ | 84 | 148 | – | Seeding of the | – | 39.5 | – | 3.57 | 41.8 | – | – | 66.2 | – |
| Schubach et al. [ | Rio de Janeiro/RJ | 10 | 347 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 49,1 | – | 0 | 70,5 | – |
| Souza et al. [ | Rio Grande/RS | 24 | – | – | Paw impressions in culture medium | 29.1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Leme et al., d | Rio de Janeiro/RJ | 12 | 11 | – | – | – | – | – | 16.7 | 45.5 | – | 25 | 72.7 | – |
| Madrid et al. [ | Rio Grande do Sul/ | – | 92 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 45.2 | – | – | – | – |
| Borges et al. [ | São Paulo/SP | 119 | 1 | – | Paw impressions in culture medium | 0 | 0.7 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Present studyc | Rio de Janeiro/ | 175 | 104 | 92 | Seeding of the pool of nail fragments | 0 | 33 | 2.5 | 1.49 | 54 | 5.3 | – | – | – |
CRG Colonization Research Group, +SG Positive Sporotrichosis Group, -SG Negative Sporotrichosis Group
aStudy performed in eight municipalities of Rio Grande do Sul (Rio Grande, Pelotas, Capão do Leão, Pedro Osório, Morro Redondo, Canguçu, São Lourenço and Bento Gonçalves)
bAnimals in this study inhabited the following areas of the state of Rio de Janeiro: west, central-south and north regions of the city of Rio de Janeiro, Baixada Fluminense, Grande Niterói, Serrana and dos Lagos Regions and central-south Fluminense
c Data referring to clinical specimens
d Data referring to domestic cats surveyed