Amir T Fathi1,2, Courtney D DiNardo3, Irina Kline4, Laurie Kenvin4, Ira Gupta4, Eyal C Attar5, Eytan M Stein6, Stephane de Botton7. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center. 2. Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston. 3. Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. 4. Celgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey. 5. Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 6. Leukemia Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 7. Department of Clinical Hematology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Abstract
Importance: Enasidenib mesylate, a mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) protein inhibitor that promotes differentiation of leukemic myeloblasts, was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in relapsed/refractory (R/R) mutant IDH2 acute myeloid leukemia (AML). During the first study of enasidenib in humans, a minority of patients with advanced myeloid neoplasms experienced unexpected signs/symptoms of a differentiation syndrome (DS), a potentially lethal entity. Objective: To characterize IDH-inhibitor-associated DS (IDH-DS) and its effective management. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using data obtained from a multicenter, open-label, pivotal phase 1/2 study of enasidenib, a differentiation syndrome review committee retrospectively evaluated potential cases of IDH-DS in enasidenib-treated patients with R/R AML. Data were collected between August 27, 2013, and October 14, 2016. The committee identified and agreed on signs and symptoms characteristic of IDH-DS and developed an algorithm for identification and treatment. Among 281 patients with R/R AML enrolled in the trial, the committee identified 72 patients for review based on investigator-reported cases of DS (n = 33) or reported adverse events or signs and symptoms characteristic of IDH-DS. Interventions: Treatment with enasidenib at a dosage of 50 to 650 mg/d was evaluated during the dose-escalation phase, and a dosage of 100 mg/d was used in the phase 1 expansion and phase 2, all in continual 28-day cycles. Main Outcomes and Measures: Unexpected adverse events of IDH-DS during the phase 1/2 study. Results: Thirty-three of the 281 patients (11.7%) were identified as having possible or probable IDH-DS. Median age of those 33 patients was 70 years (range, 38-80 years); 20 (60.6%) were male. The most frequent manifestations were dyspnea, fever, pulmonary infiltrates, and hypoxia. Median time to onset was 30 days (range, 7-129 days). Patients who experienced IDH-DS were less likely to have less than 20% bone marrow blasts (6% vs 22%, P = .04) and more likely to have undergone fewer previous anticancer regimens (median, 1.0 [range, 1-4] vs 2.0 [range, 1-14], P = .05) at study entry than those who did not. Thirteen patients (39.4%) had concomitant leukocytosis. Isocitrate dehydrogenase differentiation syndrome was effectively managed with systemic corticosteroids. The enasidenib regimen was interrupted for 15 patients (45.5%), but permanent discontinuation of treatment was not required. Conclusions and Relevance: Isocitrate dehydrogenase differentiation syndrome is a recognizable and potentially lethal clinical entity, occurring in approximately 12% of enasidenib-treated patients with mutant-IDH2 R/R AML. It requires prompt recognition and management. As use of mutant IDH inhibitors increases, these findings and recommendations are increasingly germane to care of patients with mutant-IDH neoplasms. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01915498.
Importance: Enasidenib mesylate, a mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) protein inhibitor that promotes differentiation of leukemic myeloblasts, was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in relapsed/refractory (R/R) mutant IDH2 acute myeloid leukemia (AML). During the first study of enasidenib in humans, a minority of patients with advanced myeloid neoplasms experienced unexpected signs/symptoms of a differentiation syndrome (DS), a potentially lethal entity. Objective: To characterize IDH-inhibitor-associated DS (IDH-DS) and its effective management. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using data obtained from a multicenter, open-label, pivotal phase 1/2 study of enasidenib, a differentiation syndrome review committee retrospectively evaluated potential cases of IDH-DS in enasidenib-treated patients with R/R AML. Data were collected between August 27, 2013, and October 14, 2016. The committee identified and agreed on signs and symptoms characteristic of IDH-DS and developed an algorithm for identification and treatment. Among 281 patients with R/R AML enrolled in the trial, the committee identified 72 patients for review based on investigator-reported cases of DS (n = 33) or reported adverse events or signs and symptoms characteristic of IDH-DS. Interventions: Treatment with enasidenib at a dosage of 50 to 650 mg/d was evaluated during the dose-escalation phase, and a dosage of 100 mg/d was used in the phase 1 expansion and phase 2, all in continual 28-day cycles. Main Outcomes and Measures: Unexpected adverse events of IDH-DS during the phase 1/2 study. Results: Thirty-three of the 281 patients (11.7%) were identified as having possible or probable IDH-DS. Median age of those 33 patients was 70 years (range, 38-80 years); 20 (60.6%) were male. The most frequent manifestations were dyspnea, fever, pulmonary infiltrates, and hypoxia. Median time to onset was 30 days (range, 7-129 days). Patients who experienced IDH-DS were less likely to have less than 20% bone marrow blasts (6% vs 22%, P = .04) and more likely to have undergone fewer previous anticancer regimens (median, 1.0 [range, 1-4] vs 2.0 [range, 1-14], P = .05) at study entry than those who did not. Thirteen patients (39.4%) had concomitant leukocytosis. Isocitrate dehydrogenase differentiation syndrome was effectively managed with systemic corticosteroids. The enasidenib regimen was interrupted for 15 patients (45.5%), but permanent discontinuation of treatment was not required. Conclusions and Relevance: Isocitrate dehydrogenase differentiation syndrome is a recognizable and potentially lethal clinical entity, occurring in approximately 12% of enasidenib-treated patients with mutant-IDH2 R/R AML. It requires prompt recognition and management. As use of mutant IDH inhibitors increases, these findings and recommendations are increasingly germane to care of patients with mutant-IDH neoplasms. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01915498.
Authors: L H Camacho; S L Soignet; S Chanel; R Ho; G Heller; D A Scheinberg; R Ellison; R P Warrell Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M S Tallman; J W Andersen; C A Schiffer; F R Appelbaum; J H Feusner; A Ogden; L Shepherd; J M Rowe; C François; R S Larson; P H Wiernik Journal: Blood Date: 2000-01-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Bruce D Cheson; John M Bennett; Kenneth J Kopecky; Thomas Büchner; Cheryl L Willman; Elihu H Estey; Charles A Schiffer; Hartmut Doehner; Martin S Tallman; T Andrew Lister; Francesco Lo-Coco; Roel Willemze; Andrea Biondi; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Richard A Larson; Bob Löwenberg; Miguel A Sanz; David R Head; Ryuzo Ohno; Clara D Bloomfield; Francesco LoCocco Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Eytan M Stein; Courtney D DiNardo; Daniel A Pollyea; Amir T Fathi; Gail J Roboz; Jessica K Altman; Richard M Stone; Daniel J DeAngelo; Ross L Levine; Ian W Flinn; Hagop M Kantarjian; Robert Collins; Manish R Patel; Arthur E Frankel; Anthony Stein; Mikkael A Sekeres; Ronan T Swords; Bruno C Medeiros; Christophe Willekens; Paresh Vyas; Alessandra Tosolini; Qiang Xu; Robert D Knight; Katharine E Yen; Sam Agresta; Stephane de Botton; Martin S Tallman Journal: Blood Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 25.476
Authors: Katharine Yen; Jeremy Travins; Fang Wang; Muriel D David; Erin Artin; Kimberly Straley; Anil Padyana; Stefan Gross; Byron DeLaBarre; Erica Tobin; Yue Chen; Raj Nagaraja; Sung Choe; Lei Jin; Zenon Konteatis; Giovanni Cianchetta; Jeffrey O Saunders; Francesco G Salituro; Cyril Quivoron; Paule Opolon; Olivia Bawa; Véronique Saada; Angelo Paci; Sophie Broutin; Olivier A Bernard; Stéphane de Botton; Benoît S Marteyn; Monika Pilichowska; YingXia Xu; Cheng Fang; Fan Jiang; Wentao Wei; Shengfang Jin; Lee Silverman; Wei Liu; Hua Yang; Lenny Dang; Marion Dorsch; Virginie Penard-Lacronique; Scott A Biller; Shin-San Michael Su Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 38.272
Authors: Maria E Figueroa; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Chao Lu; Patrick S Ward; Jay Patel; Alan Shih; Yushan Li; Neha Bhagwat; Aparna Vasanthakumar; Hugo F Fernandez; Martin S Tallman; Zhuoxin Sun; Kristy Wolniak; Justine K Peeters; Wei Liu; Sung E Choe; Valeria R Fantin; Elisabeth Paietta; Bob Löwenberg; Jonathan D Licht; Lucy A Godley; Ruud Delwel; Peter J M Valk; Craig B Thompson; Ross L Levine; Ari Melnick Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2010-12-09 Impact factor: 38.585
Authors: Gail J Roboz; Courtney D DiNardo; Eytan M Stein; Stéphane de Botton; Alice S Mims; Gabrielle T Prince; Jessica K Altman; Martha L Arellano; Will Donnellan; Harry P Erba; Gabriel N Mannis; Daniel A Pollyea; Anthony S Stein; Geoffrey L Uy; Justin M Watts; Amir T Fathi; Hagop M Kantarjian; Martin S Tallman; Sung Choe; David Dai; Bin Fan; Hongfang Wang; Vickie Zhang; Katharine E Yen; Stephanie M Kapsalis; Denice Hickman; Hua Liu; Samuel V Agresta; Bin Wu; Eyal C Attar; Richard M Stone Journal: Blood Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Hyun Don Yun; Sunita Nathan; Melissa Larson; Mohammad J Hussain; Deborah A Katz; Ankur Varma; Ira Miller; Celalettin Ustun Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2019-11-26