Literature DB >> 29346474

Examining Nonparticipation in the Maternal Follow-up Within the Danish National Birth Cohort.

Mette Bliddal1, Zeyan Liew2, Anton Pottegård3, Helene Kirkegaard4, Jørn Olsen5, Ellen A Nohr4.   

Abstract

A follow-up questionnaire on maternal health was distributed within the Danish National Birth Cohort (established in 1996-2002) 14 years after the index birth. Responses were obtained from 41,466 (53.2%) of 78,010 eligible mothers. To ensure the appropriate use of these data, the possibility of selection bias due to nonparticipation had to be evaluated. We estimated 4 selected exposure-outcome associations (prepregnancy weight-depression; exercise-degenerative musculoskeletal conditions; smoking-heart disease; and alcohol consumption-breast cancer). We adjusted for several factors associated with participation and applied inverse probability weighting. To estimate the degree of selection bias, we calculated relative odds ratios for the relationship between the baseline cohort and the subset participating in the Maternal Follow-up. Participating women were generally healthier, of higher social status, and older than the baseline cohort. However, selection bias in the chosen scenarios was limited; ratios of the odds ratios ranged from -14% to 5% after adjustment for age, parity, social status, and, if the variable was not the exposure variable, prepregnancy body mass index, exercise, smoking, and alcohol consumption. Applying inverse probability weighting did not further reduce bias. In conclusion, while participants differed somewhat from the baseline cohort, selection bias was limited after factors associated with participation status were accounted for.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29346474      PMCID: PMC6030819          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwy002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  29 in total

1.  Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias?

Authors:  Ellen Aagaard Nohr; Morten Frydenberg; Tine Brink Henriksen; Jorn Olsen
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  The Danish Medical Birth Registry.

Authors:  L B Knudsen; J Olsen
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  1998-06

3.  Selection by socioeconomic factors into the Danish National Birth Cohort.

Authors:  Tine Neermann Jacobsen; Ellen Aagaard Nohr; Morten Frydenberg
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  The impact of attrition in an 11-year prospective longitudinal study of younger women.

Authors:  Jennifer Powers; Deborah Loxton
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Estimating bias from loss to follow-up in the Danish National Birth Cohort.

Authors:  Naomi Greene; Sander Greenland; Jørn Olsen; Ellen Aagaard Nohr
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 6.  Overweight, obesity, and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Floriana S Luppino; Leonore M de Wit; Paul F Bouvy; Theo Stijnen; Pim Cuijpers; Brenda W J H Penninx; Frans G Zitman
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-03

7.  The Danish Civil Registration System.

Authors:  Carsten Bøcker Pedersen
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 8.  Obesity and anxiety during pregnancy and postpartum: A systematic review.

Authors:  Michaela Nagl; Katja Linde; Holger Stepan; Anette Kersting
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 9.  The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential.

Authors:  Morten Schmidt; Sigrun Alba Johannesdottir Schmidt; Jakob Lynge Sandegaard; Vera Ehrenstein; Lars Pedersen; Henrik Toft Sørensen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.790

10.  Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: Danish registries for studies of medical genetic diseases.

Authors:  Mary Nguyen-Nielsen; Elisabeth Svensson; Ida Vogel; Vera Ehrenstein; Lone Sunde
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 4.790

View more
  6 in total

1.  Limited evidence of non-response bias despite modest response rate in a nationwide survey of long-term cancer survivors-results from the NOR-CAYACS study.

Authors:  Hanne C Lie; Corina S Rueegg; Sophie D Fosså; Jon H Loge; Ellen Ruud; Cecilie E Kiserud
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Mode of birth and long-term sexual health: a follow-up study of mothers in the Danish National Birth Cohort.

Authors:  Sarah Hjorth; Helene Kirkegaard; Jørn Olsen; Jim G Thornton; Ellen A Nohr
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Risk of selection bias due to non-participation in a cohort study on pubertal timing.

Authors:  Nis Brix; Andreas Ernst; Lea Lykke Braskhøj Lauridsen; Erik Thorlund Parner; Onyebuchi A Arah; Jørn Olsen; Tine Brink Henriksen; Cecilia Høst Ramlau-Hansen
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  Maternal weight change from prepregnancy to 18 months postpartum and subsequent risk of hypertension and cardiovascular disease in Danish women: A cohort study.

Authors:  Helene Kirkegaard; Mette Bliddal; Henrik Støvring; Kathleen M Rasmussen; Erica P Gunderson; Lars Køber; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Ellen A Nøhr
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Lifestyle Habits among Pregnant Women in Denmark during the First COVID-19 Lockdown Compared with a Historical Period-A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Hanne Kristine Hegaard; Ane Lilleøre Rom; Karl Bang Christensen; Lotte Broberg; Stinne Høgh; Cecilie Holm Christiansen; Nina Olsen Nathan; Mie Gaarskjaer de Wolff; Peter Damm
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  The PRIDE Study: Evaluation of online methods of data collection.

Authors:  Marleen M H J van Gelder; Peter J F M Merkus; Joris van Drongelen; Jessie W Swarts; Tom H van de Belt; Nel Roeleveld
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.980

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.