Literature DB >> 29346039

Evaluation of a French Regional Telemedicine Network Dedicated to Neurological Emergencies: A 14-Year Study.

Elisabeth Medeiros de Bustos1, Eric Berthier2, Didier Chavot3, Benjamin Bouamra1, Thierry Moulin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Equality in healthcare between urban and rural areas is problematic in France. Telemedicine networks are expected to improve equality in expertise assessment. We aimed to evaluate the use and impact of a regional rural French telemedicine network, dedicated to medical and surgical neurological emergencies, on interhospital patient transfers.
METHODS: Eight community hospital emergency departments were remotely connected to the only university hospital in Franche-Comté, France. We prospectively obtained data from all patients consecutively admitted to emergency care departments in the region and who received medical or neurosurgical expertise by telemedicine from January 2002 to December 2015. The reasons for requesting expertise, number of requested neurological opinions, and interhospital patient transfers were analyzed. Economic savings were determined by estimating the cost of avoided transfers.
RESULTS: A total of 23,710 patients had telemedicine consultations in the region. The network was used by every community hospital (independently of the existence of local neurological teams). These consultations were overwhelmingly for cases of stroke (30%) and head or spinal injuries (36%). Cerebral tumors represented 9% of teleconsultations. In 2015, 75% of patients admitted to the remote hospitals that did not have onsite neurological expertise nevertheless received neurovascular tele-expertise. The rate of thrombolyzed patients dramatically increased within 13 years regionally (9.9%) and 33.5% of thrombolyses were performed by telemedicine. The number of patients examined by telemedicine and admitted for head or spinal injuries also increased over the 13-year period (12% vs. 21%). Secondary interhospital transfers were halved for both pathologies. The estimated saving is ∼€3.5 million.
CONCLUSION: Telemedicine networks facilitate acute-phase neurological assessment and prevent unnecessary secondary interhospital transfers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  head and spinal injury; healthcare; stroke; telemedicine; telestroke

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29346039     DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  4 in total

1.  Early Lessons From World War COVID Reinventing Our Stroke Systems of Care.

Authors:  Sunil A Sheth; Tzu-Ching Wu; Anjail Sharrief; Christy Ankrom; James C Grotta; Marc Fisher; Sean I Savitz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  HRSA's evidence-based tele-emergency network grant program: Multi-site prospective cohort analysis across six rural emergency department telemedicine networks.

Authors:  Sarah Heppner; Nicholas M Mohr; Knute D Carter; Fred Ullrich; Kimberly A S Merchant; Marcia M Ward
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A Web-Based Survey Assessing the Attitudes of Health Care Professionals in Germany Toward the Use of Telemedicine in Pregnancy Monitoring: Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Niklas Grassl; Juliane Nees; Katharina Schramm; Julia Spratte; Christof Sohn; Timm C Schott; Sarah Schott
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 4.773

4.  Telemedicine as the New Outpatient Clinic Gone Digital: Position Paper From the Pandemic Health System REsilience PROGRAM (REPROGRAM) International Consortium (Part 2).

Authors:  Sonu Bhaskar; Sian Bradley; Vijay Kumar Chattu; Anil Adisesh; Alma Nurtazina; Saltanat Kyrykbayeva; Sateesh Sakhamuri; Sebastian Moguilner; Shawna Pandya; Starr Schroeder; Maciej Banach; Daniel Ray
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-09-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.