Literature DB >> 29345639

Emergent constraint on equilibrium climate sensitivity from global temperature variability.

Peter M Cox1, Chris Huntingford2, Mark S Williamson1.   

Abstract

Equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) remains one of the most important unknowns in climate change science. ECS is defined as the global mean warming that would occur if the atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration were instantly doubled and the climate were then brought to equilibrium with that new level of CO2. Despite its rather idealized definition, ECS has continuing relevance for international climate change agreements, which are often framed in terms of stabilization of global warming relative to the pre-industrial climate. However, the 'likely' range of ECS as stated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has remained at 1.5-4.5 degrees Celsius for more than 25 years. The possibility of a value of ECS towards the upper end of this range reduces the feasibility of avoiding 2 degrees Celsius of global warming, as required by the Paris Agreement. Here we present a new emergent constraint on ECS that yields a central estimate of 2.8 degrees Celsius with 66 per cent confidence limits (equivalent to the IPCC 'likely' range) of 2.2-3.4 degrees Celsius. Our approach is to focus on the variability of temperature about long-term historical warming, rather than on the warming trend itself. We use an ensemble of climate models to define an emergent relationship between ECS and a theoretically informed metric of global temperature variability. This metric of variability can also be calculated from observational records of global warming, which enables tighter constraints to be placed on ECS, reducing the probability of ECS being less than 1.5 degrees Celsius to less than 3 per cent, and the probability of ECS exceeding 4.5 degrees Celsius to less than 1 per cent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29345639     DOI: 10.1038/nature25450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  19 in total

1.  Advances in risk assessment for climate change adaptation policy.

Authors:  W Neil Adger; Iain Brown; Swenja Surminski
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The Terrestrial Biosphere Model Farm.

Authors:  Joshua B Fisher; Munish Sikka; Gary L Block; Christopher R Schwalm; Nicholas C Parazoo; Hannah R Kolus; Malen Sok; Audrey Wang; Anna Gagne-Landmann; Shakirudeen Lawal; Alexandre Guillaume; Alyssa Poletti; Kevin M Schaefer; Bassil El Masri; Peter E Levy; Yaxing Wei; Michael C Dietze; Deborah N Huntzinger
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 8.469

Review 3.  An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence.

Authors:  S C Sherwood; M J Webb; J D Annan; K C Armour; P M Forster; J C Hargreaves; G Hegerl; S A Klein; K D Marvel; E J Rohling; M Watanabe; T Andrews; P Braconnot; C S Bretherton; G L Foster; Z Hausfather; A S von der Heydt; R Knutti; T Mauritsen; J R Norris; C Proistosescu; M Rugenstein; G A Schmidt; K B Tokarska; M D Zelinka
Journal:  Rev Geophys       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 24.946

4.  Beneficial effects of climate warming on boreal tree growth may be transitory.

Authors:  Loïc D'Orangeville; Daniel Houle; Louis Duchesne; Richard P Phillips; Yves Bergeron; Daniel Kneeshaw
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Accounting for skill in trend, variability, and autocorrelation facilitates better multi-model projections: Application to the AMOC and temperature time series.

Authors:  Roman Olson; Soon-Il An; Yanan Fan; Jason P Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Coping with climate change: limited behavioral responses to hot weather in a tropical carnivore.

Authors:  D Rabaiotti; Rosie Woodroffe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Climate policy implications of nonlinear decline of Arctic land permafrost and other cryosphere elements.

Authors:  Dmitry Yumashev; Chris Hope; Kevin Schaefer; Kathrin Riemann-Campe; Fernando Iglesias-Suarez; Elchin Jafarov; Eleanor J Burke; Paul J Young; Yasin Elshorbany; Gail Whiteman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Emergent Constraints on Regional Cloud Feedbacks.

Authors:  Nicholas J Lutsko; Max Popp; Robert H Nazarian; Anna Lea Albright
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.720

9.  Spatio-temporal variations and factors of a provincial PM2.5 pollution in eastern China during 2013-2017 by geostatistics.

Authors:  Xue Sun; Xiao-San Luo; Jiangbing Xu; Zhen Zhao; Yan Chen; Lichun Wu; Qi Chen; Dan Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Improved estimates of preindustrial biomass burning reduce the magnitude of aerosol climate forcing in the Southern Hemisphere.

Authors:  Pengfei Liu; Jed O Kaplan; Loretta J Mickley; Yang Li; Nathan J Chellman; Monica M Arienzo; John K Kodros; Jeffrey R Pierce; Michael Sigl; Johannes Freitag; Robert Mulvaney; Mark A J Curran; Joseph R McConnell
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.