Literature DB >> 29345003

Investigation of attributes which guide choice in cataract surgery services in urban Sydney, Australia.

Celeste Gilbert1, Lisa Keay1, Anna Palagyi1, Vu Quang Do1,2, Peter McCluskey3, Andrew White3,4,5, Nicole Carnt3, Fiona Stapleton2, Tracey-Lea Laba1,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is critical to consult patients to develop patient-centred cataract surgery care. We aimed to identify attributes patients consider when making decisions about cataract surgery in an Australian context, where both publicly and privately funded surgery are available. This is the first step in investigating how decisions are made about cataract surgery services.
METHODS: This observational qualitative study was undertaken in two public hospitals and one private practice in Sydney, Australia. The study involved 19 women and men with age-related cataracts and no previous cataract surgery, aged > 18 years, able to speak conversational English or Mandarin. A multi-stage attribute development process was followed, including: literature review, semi-structured interviews with surgery candidates in three eye clinics, and review by an expert panel. The main outcome measures were primary attributes for making choices about cataract surgery.
RESULTS: Wait time, cost, institutional reputation, surgeon experience and travel time were identified as principal attributes; lower value was placed on consultation length and accessibility. Non-English speaking participants indicated greater interest in pre-operative information than English speakers, but expressed trust in the Australian healthcare system.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest individuals prioritise attributes which consume time or incur costs when accessing care (wait time, cost and travel time). They also consider factors associated with the outcome of their cataract surgery (surgeon experience and institutional reputation). Similar to other decision-making processes, patients are likely to trade between these different attributes depending on their personal preferences and circumstances.
© 2018 Optometry Australia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cataract; discrete choice experiment; patient preferences; patient-centred care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29345003     DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Optom        ISSN: 0816-4622            Impact factor:   2.742


  3 in total

1.  Reporting Formative Qualitative Research to Support the Development of Quantitative Preference Study Protocols and Corresponding Survey Instruments: Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers.

Authors:  Ilene L Hollin; Benjamin M Craig; Joanna Coast; Kathleen Beusterien; Caroline Vass; Rachael DiSantostefano; Holly Peay
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Patient-centred care in ophthalmology: current practices, effectiveness and challenges.

Authors:  Shing Chuen Chow; Pun Yuet Lam; Bonnie Nga Kwan Choy
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Attribute development and level selection for a discrete choice experiment to elicit the preferences of health care providers for capitation payment mechanism in Kenya.

Authors:  Melvin Obadha; Edwine Barasa; Jacob Kazungu; Gilbert Abotisem Abiiro; Jane Chuma
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2019-10-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.