Literature DB >> 29344552

Collagen and Calcium Binding EGF Domains 1 (CCBE1) in cancer - a new role past lymphatics?

Aruz Mesci1, Stanley K Liu1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCBE1; breast cancer; miR-330-3p

Year:  2017        PMID: 29344552      PMCID: PMC5769978          DOI: 10.18632/oncoscience.376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoscience        ISSN: 2331-4737


× No keyword cloud information.
Genes that influence cancer behavior continue to be the focus of a plethora of research studies, with the hopes of either identifying biomarkers that help predict/ prognosticate disease course, or discovering druggable targets for future therapies. Many of the gene products implicated in cancer also regulate normal developmental processes, hinting at the intimacy of the two processes. Collagen and Calcium Binding EGF Domains 1 (CCBE1) encodes a soluble protein with EGF-like domain and is located in human chromosomal region 18q21.32. Despite its original description as a gene frequently lost in breast cancer specimens [1], the earliest studies on the function of CCBE1 showed a role for it in lymphangiogenesis in Zebrafish [2], and in Hennekam syndrome [3]. In the last two years, more reports on the role of CCBE1 in cancer have started to emerge [4-6]. In a recent publication, we showed that CCBE1 is targeted by microRNA 330-3p (miR-330-3p), resulting in a more aggressive phenotype in breast cancer [4]. We initially observed that miR-330-3p, a tumour- promoting miR previously studied in a number of other cancers [cited in 4], was not yet investigated within the context of breast cancer. We noted that miR-330- 3p expression was elevated in a cohort of human breast cancer patients, and that its expression correlated with poorer distant relapse-free survival (DRFS). Through in vitro invasion assays and an ex ovo model of metastasis using breast carcinoma cell lines, we showed that increased expression of miR-330-3p resulted in a more aggressive phenotype. We also identified CCBE1 to be a direct target of miR-330-3p using luciferase assays, and that CCBE1 loss via siRNA-mediated knockdown recapitulated this phenotype. In agreement with our cell-based assays, we noted that CCBE1 expression was decreased in certain patient cohorts, and that low levels of CCBE1 were associated with reduced DRFS and overall survival (OS). Conspicuously, our results were in close agreement with the initial study that examined the role of CCBE1 in cancer [5]. The authors indicated that CCBE1 was often downregulated in ovarian and breast carcinomas via hypermethylation, and that CCBE1 loss resulted in increased migration in transwell assays. CCBE1 expression was lower in ovarian carcinomas (over normal stroma), as well as in higher grade tumours. The authors showed a non-significant trend towards lower CCBE1 expression in higher FIGO stage cancers, and speculated that its loss may occur early in carcinogenesis. Our study supported this possibility in that ductal carcinoma in- situ (DCIS) samples had lower expression of CCBE1 compared to normal breast tissue. However, findings of decreased DRFS with lower CCBE1 expression in both studies argue that the extent of CCBE1 loss remains consequential beyond initiation of carcinogenesis. Not all studies support a tumour-suppressor role for CCBE1, however. A separate study investigating the clinicopathological correlation of CCBE1 expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) found that CCBE1 was elevated in higher risk GISTs, and that increased expression of CCBE1 predicted lower DRFS and OS [6]. Mechanistically, CCBE1 appeared to promote angiogenesis and increased resistance to imatinib in vitro. While at odds with our study and that of Barton, et al., the biology inherent to GISTs compared to breast or ovarian cancers may underlie these differences. Alternatively, the tumour-suppressing or tumour-promoting function of CCBE1 may be context-specific, even within cancers of the same tissue origin. While different perspectives on the biological roles of CCBE1 are emerging, the mechanism of CCBE1 action in cancer cells, as well as within the tumour microenvironment (e.g., stroma and vasculature) have yet to be thoroughly explored. To address this, studies are investigating signaling pathways engaged by CCBE1, and the biological function of its various domains [7-8]. Only with further research into the molecular and cellular biology of CCBE1, can we expect to gain a greater understanding of its role in cancer.
  8 in total

1.  Functional Dissection of the CCBE1 Protein: A Crucial Requirement for the Collagen Repeat Domain.

Authors:  M Guy Roukens; Josi Peterson-Maduro; Yvonne Padberg; Michael Jeltsch; Veli-Matti Leppänen; Frank L Bos; Kari Alitalo; Stefan Schulte-Merker; Dörte Schulte
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Ccbe1 is required for embryonic lymphangiogenesis and venous sprouting.

Authors:  Benjamin M Hogan; Frank L Bos; Jeroen Bussmann; Merlijn Witte; Neil C Chi; Henricus J Duckers; Stefan Schulte-Merker
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Mutations in CCBE1 cause generalized lymph vessel dysplasia in humans.

Authors:  Marielle Alders; Benjamin M Hogan; Evisa Gjini; Faranak Salehi; Lihadh Al-Gazali; Eric A Hennekam; Eva E Holmberg; Marcel M A M Mannens; Margot F Mulder; G Johan A Offerhaus; Trine E Prescott; Eelco J Schroor; Joke B G M Verheij; Merlijn Witte; Petra J Zwijnenburg; Mikka Vikkula; Stefan Schulte-Merker; Raoul C Hennekam
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Scanning copy number and gene expression on the 18q21-qter chromosomal region by the systematic multiplex PCR and reverse transcription-PCR methods.

Authors:  Fumiichiro Yamamoto; Miyako Yamamoto
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Efficient activation of the lymphangiogenic growth factor VEGF-C requires the C-terminal domain of VEGF-C and the N-terminal domain of CCBE1.

Authors:  Sawan Kumar Jha; Khushbu Rauniyar; Terhi Karpanen; Veli-Matti Leppänen; Pascal Brouillard; Miikka Vikkula; Kari Alitalo; Michael Jeltsch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Targeting of CCBE1 by miR-330-3p in human breast cancer promotes metastasis.

Authors:  Aruz Mesci; Xiaoyong Huang; Samira Taeb; Sahar Jahangiri; Yohan Kim; Emmanouil Fokas; Jeff Bruce; Hon S Leong; Stanley K Liu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Collagen and calcium-binding EGF domains 1 is frequently inactivated in ovarian cancer by aberrant promoter hypermethylation and modulates cell migration and survival.

Authors:  C A Barton; B S Gloss; W Qu; A L Statham; N F Hacker; R L Sutherland; S J Clark; P M O'Brien
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  CCBE1 promotes GIST development through enhancing angiogenesis and mediating resistance to imatinib.

Authors:  Guang-Ang Tian; Chun-Chao Zhu; Xiao-Xin Zhang; Lei Zhu; Xiao-Mei Yang; Shu-Heng Jiang; Rong-Kun Li; Lin Tu; Yang Wang; Chun Zhuang; Ping He; Qing Li; Xiao-Yan Cao; Hui Cao; Zhi-Gang Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  The clinical significance of CCBE1 expression in human colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yan-Rong Zhao; Hao Liu; Li-Miao Xiao; Can-Guang Jin; Zhi-Peng Zhang; Chun-Guang Yang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.989

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.