Objective: Splinting full-thickness cutaneous wounds in mice has allowed for a humanized model of wound healing. Delineating the epithelial edge and assessing time to closure of these healing wounds via macroscopic visualization have remained a challenge. Approach: Double transgenic mice were created by crossbreeding K14-Cre and ROSAmT/mG reporter mice. Full-thickness excisional wounds were created in K14-Cre/ROSAmT/mG mice (n = 5) and imaged using both normal and fluorescent light on the day of surgery, and every other postoperative day (POD) until wound healing was complete. Ten blinded observers analyzed a series of images from a single representative healing wound, taken using normal or fluorescent light, to decide the POD when healing was complete. K14-Cre/ROSAmT/mG mice (n = 4) were subsequently sacrificed at the four potential days of rated wound closure to accurately determine the histological point of wound closure using microscopic fluorescence imaging. Results: Average time to wound closure was rated significantly longer in the wound series images taken using normal light, compared with fluorescent light (mean POD 13.6 vs. 11.6, *p = 0.008). Fluorescence imaging of histological samples indicated that reepithelialization was complete at 12 days postwounding. Innovation: We describe a novel technique, using double transgenic mice K14-Cre/ROSAmT/mG and fluorescence imaging, to more accurately determine the healing time of wounds in mice upon macroscopic evaluation. Conclusion: The accuracy by which wound healing can be macroscopically determined in vivo in mouse models of wound healing is significantly enhanced using K14-Cre/ROSAmT/mG double transgenic mice and fluorescence imaging.
Objective: Splinting full-thickness cutaneous wounds in mice has allowed for a humanized model of wound healing. Delineating the epithelial edge and assessing time to closure of these healing wounds via macroscopic visualization have remained a challenge. Approach: Double transgenic mice were created by crossbreeding K14-Cre and ROSAmT/mG reporter mice. Full-thickness excisional wounds were created in K14-Cre/ROSAmT/mG mice (n = 5) and imaged using both normal and fluorescent light on the day of surgery, and every other postoperative day (POD) until wound healing was complete. Ten blinded observers analyzed a series of images from a single representative healing wound, taken using normal or fluorescent light, to decide the POD when healing was complete. K14-Cre/ROSAmT/mG mice (n = 4) were subsequently sacrificed at the four potential days of rated wound closure to accurately determine the histological point of wound closure using microscopic fluorescence imaging. Results: Average time to wound closure was rated significantly longer in the wound series images taken using normal light, compared with fluorescent light (mean POD 13.6 vs. 11.6, *p = 0.008). Fluorescence imaging of histological samples indicated that reepithelialization was complete at 12 days postwounding. Innovation: We describe a novel technique, using double transgenic mice K14-Cre/ROSAmT/mG and fluorescence imaging, to more accurately determine the healing time of wounds in mice upon macroscopic evaluation. Conclusion: The accuracy by which wound healing can be macroscopically determined in vivo in mouse models of wound healing is significantly enhanced using K14-Cre/ROSAmT/mG double transgenic mice and fluorescence imaging.
Authors: Yasuyuki Amoh; Lingna Li; Kensei Katsuoka; Sheldon Penman; Robert M Hoffman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-03-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Joseph Michaels; Samara S Churgin; Keith M Blechman; Matthew R Greives; Shahram Aarabi; Robert D Galiano; Geoffrey C Gurtner Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Hongkwan Cho; Swathi Balaji; Natalie L Hone; Chad M Moles; Abdul Q Sheikh; Timothy M Crombleholme; Sundeep G Keswani; Daria A Narmoneva Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: David M Ansell; Laura Campbell; Helen A Thomason; Andrew Brass; Matthew J Hardman Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2014 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Shin Ae Park; Vijay Krishna Raghunathan; Nihar M Shah; Leandro Teixeira; Monica J Motta; Jill Covert; Richard Dubielzig; Michael Schurr; Roslyn Rivkah Isseroff; Nicholas L Abbott; Jonathan McAnulty; Christopher J Murphy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dominik Pförringer; Matthias M Aitzetmüller; Elizabeth A Brett; Khosrow S Houschyar; Richard Schäfer; Martijn van Griensven; Dominik Duscher Journal: Stem Cells Int Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 5.443