Literature DB >> 29344268

Interferon-γ and Colorectal Cancer: an up-to date.

Christoforos Kosmidis1, Konstantinos Sapalidis1, Triantafyllia Koletsa2, Maria Kosmidou3, Christoforos Efthimiadis4, George Anthimidis4, Nikolaos Varsamis1, Nikolaos Michalopoulos1, Charilaos Koulouris1, Stefanos Atmatzidis1, Lazaros Liavas1, Titika-Marina Strati1, Georgios Koimtzis1, Alexandros Tsakalidis1, Stylianos Mantalovas1, Katerina Zarampouka2, Maria Florou1, Dimitrios E Giannakidis1, Eleni Georgakoudi1, Sofia Baka5, Paul Zarogoulidis6, Yan-Gao Man7, Isaac Kesisoglou1.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer still remains the third cause of cancer death among cancer patients. Early diagnosis is crucial and they can be either endoscopic or with blood biomarkers. Endoscopic methods consist of gastroscopy and colonoscopy, however; in recent years, endoscopic ultrasound is being used. The microenvironment is very important for the successful delivery of the treatment. Several proteins and hormones play a crucial role in the efficiency of the treatment. In the current mini review we will focus on interferon-γ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; interferon-γ.; microenvironment

Year:  2018        PMID: 29344268      PMCID: PMC5771329          DOI: 10.7150/jca.22962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer        ISSN: 1837-9664            Impact factor:   4.207


Introduction

Over the past decade a slight decline has been observed in colorectal cancer (CRC), however; it still remains the third most common cancer among cancer patients worldwide. It has been observed that CRC is associated with old age, lifestyle factors and in some cases due to underlying genetic disorders 1. The well-known risk factors include obesity, diet, lack of physical activity and smoking 1. Moreover; there are several dietary factors that have been identified to increase the risk of CRC such as; red and processed meat, and alcohol. Other risk factors identified are inflammatory bowel diseases, which include ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. There are also on the other hand inherited genetic disorders that have been identified to cause CRC and these include familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer; < 5% of the CRC cases 1. Usually a benign tumor, a polyp, occurs and which over time becomes cancerous 1. It may be diagnosed by obtaining a sample of the colon during sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. Staging follows with imaging techniques to determine if the disease has spread 2. Currently we have effective screening methods which prevent and decrease deaths from CRC 3. We have a number of methods which are recommended and can start from the age of 50 to 75 3. Furthermore, during colonoscopy, small polyps may be removed if found. On the other hand when a large polyp or tumor is found, then a biopsy may be performed to check if it is cancerous. However; it has been observed that aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs decrease the risk 4. They are not used in general for this purpose, due to side effects 5. There are currently several treatments used for colorectal cancer and these are: combination of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy and targeted therapy 6. Colorectal cancers that are confined within the wall of the colon may be curable with surgery while cancer that has spread widely is usually not curable. The CRCs that cannot be removed then management is being directed towards improving quality of life and symptoms 6. Until now, five year survival rates in the United States are around 65% 7. Survival rate however depends on how advanced the cancer is, and whether or not all the cancer bulk can be removed with surgery. All these factors of course are well associated with the person's overall health. Again, CRC is the third most common type of cancer making up about 10% of all cases 7. In 2012, there were 1.4 million new cases and 694,000 deaths from the disease 7. It is more common in developed countries, where more than 65% of cases are found 7. It is less common in women than men 7. In this current mini-review we will concentrate on the tumor microenvironment (ME) and the interferon-γ as factor associated with the disease outcome.

Microenvironment

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is considered the physiological order within a tissue. This tissue space consists of tumor cells and an array of non-malignant cells such as; fibroblasts, immune cells, blood and lymphatic vessel networks, adipose tissue, and of course the extracellular matrix 8. The non-cancerous cells can be more than 50% of the overall tumor mass 9. Inside the TME, complex communication pathways have been observed 10, allowing the tumor and the TME to independently influence one another. The TME is responsible for the tumor phenotype and targeted therapy 11. A healthy local microenvironment surrounding a tumor provides a barrier with anticancer effects. This observation was firstly made in melanoma where the number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was shown to correlate with better clinical outcomes. Moreover; the same was also observed in colorectal cancer, where an active TME and signs of an immune response were associated with the absence of early metastasis and increased survival 12. Local immune cells were observed to act as guards against nascent transformed cells over 60 years ago 13. However, as tumors develop, their TME becomes disrupted, protection is lost, and tumor progression continues. The association between a disrupted microenvironment and malignancy is well established and is correlated with chronic inflammation 14 where local dysfunction acts to induce oncogenic mutations, angiogenesis, genomic instability, and early tumor promotion 14. Cancer cells are known to directly disrupt and manipulate their local microenvironment by hijacking local cells and coercing them to provide varying services to help avoid the immune response or aid in other processes of tumor development. This occurs by supplying cytokines, growth factors, proteinases through angiogenesis 15. To date the best studied of these commandeered cells are the tumor-associated macrophage (TAM), the myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and the cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF). The TAM cell is known to provide local support to the TME 16. Usually macrophages act as a main defense against pathogens and form a bridge between the innate and adaptive immune systems. However; when they are exposed to hypoxic conditions and tumor-derived factors, macrophages begin to change phenotype and functionality 17. To date clinical data indicate that the accumulation of TAMs within a tumor has been associated with poorer prognosis 18. The production of TAMs was initially described as a phenotypic change of the M1 macrophage, which in turn produces pro-inflammatory cytokines. The M2 macrophage are known to produce anti-inflammatory and pro-tumorigenic functions 19. This observation was best described in a mouse mammary cancer model that suggested TAMs are phenotypically and functionally different from M2 macrophages. Furthermore; this reported that TAMs are more likely to originate from CCR2+ inflammatory monocytes that depend on the notch signaling pathway for differentiation 20. There are also cancer-associated fibroblasts that are fibroblasts that have become activated by local factors within the TME 21. These have similar morphological properties to myofibroblasts 22 and are known to assume the phenotype of a facilitator of tissue repair. The mechanism starts by generating and releasing growth factors and regulating inflammation and immunity 23. On the other hand cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), do not revert to a normal phenotype nor undergo apoptosis 24. These cells have been implicated in many aspects of tumor progression through varying mechanisms 25. It has been observed CAFs isolated from human breast carcinoma were subcutaneously co-injected with a breast cancer cell line into an immunodeficient murine host, then tumor proliferation was significantly increased. Additional experiments attributed this to the CAF's ability to secrete stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1; also known as CXCL12) 26. In another experiment; mice orthotopically co-xenografted with human pancreatic cancer cells and CAFs developed pancreatic tumors and metastases. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) secretome stimulates the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) 27. Moreover; cancer-associated fibroblasts also assist in metastasis by supplying transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) to tumor cells which is a multifunctional cytokine known to mediate the epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) 28. Moreover; tumor necrosis growth factor (TNF-β) is also pro-angiogenic, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and along with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor, and SDF-1 is released by CAFs to enhance endothelial cell proliferation and migration 25. The myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) is activated in pathological states and it has been known to have immunosuppressive capacity 29. The myeloid-derived suppressor cells are known to protect the host organ from the harmful effects of excessive immune stimulation (such as; chronic inflammation). It has been observed that myeloid-derived suppressor cells were elevated in mice with antigen-induced autoimmune enterocolitis 30. On the other hand in cancer patients, activation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells is an effective method of protection from immune- mediated killing 29 by inhibiting antigen-presenting dendritic cells, T and B cell proliferation, and natural killer cell cytotoxicity 31. Furthermore, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) have also been implicated directly in tumor metastasis through the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) 22. U373 glioma cells that expressed a highly oncogenic form of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), called EGFRvIII, were observed to have the ability to transmit this protein to non-EGFRvIII expressing cells via extracellular vesicles (EVs) 32. Moreover; on the study it was confirmed that that the cells expressing the malignant form of EGFR also increased their rate of extracellular vesicles production to levels that were easily detected in the blood of its murine host 33. Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles were also observed to interact with and influence cells of the surrounding stroma. It has been also observed that breast cancer-derived extracellular vesicles can carry oncogenic proteins to surrounding fibroblasts inducing transformation and the acquisition of malignant features 34. Furthermore; the following proteins heat shock proteins (HSP70 and HSP90) and survivin, were observed to inhibit apoptosis and increase cellular proliferation. These have been isolated from tumor-derived extracellular vesicles and have shown to promote a more aggressive cancer phenotype 35 36. Moreover; it has been observed that cancer-associated fibroblasts CAF-derived extracellular vesicles containing increased levels of miRNA-21 suppress apoptosis and profoundly promote tumor growth in ovarian cancer 37. Increased pancreatic cancer aggressiveness has been associated with tumor cell-mediated uptake of CAF-derived Annexin A6+ (ANXA6) EVs 38. Human mesenchymal stem cells release extracellular vesicles that lead to the phosphorylation of protein kinase B in gastric cancer cell lines which are associated with cancer cell proliferation 39. It is known that tumorigenesis is associated with increased uptake amounts of oxygen and nutrients to support the enlarging cellular population and angiogenesis which are necessary mechanisms for tumor survival 40. Extracellular vesicles are implicated in many of the sophisticated processes of angiogenesis. Extracellular vesicles carry pro-angiogenic factors as cargo including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibrotic growth factor-2 (FGF2), which leads to a global increase in extracellular vesicles release from cancer cells 41. It is known that glioblastoma is characterized by severe hypoxia 42, and therefore large areas of necrosis are observed within the tumor. Glioblastoma cells have been demonstrated not only to secrete extracellular vesicles that contain tissue factor but also activate hypoxic endothelial cells 43, 44. Furthermore, RNAs carried by extracellular vesicles EVs have also been implicated in neo-angiogenic processes. In specific in CRC, tumor-derived extracellular vesicles contain cell cycle M-phase-related mRNAs including centromere protein E, and cyclin-dependent kinase 8 which promote endothelial proliferation 45. CRC cell-derived extracellular vesicles also carry miRNAs, including miRNA-9, which causes strong angiogenic 46 (Figure 1-3).
Figure 1

The enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR effect), hypoxia, carcinoma associated fibroblasts (CAFs), Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), extracellular matrix remodeling, relation to T cells, apoptosis, reproduction

Figure 3

Chemical structure of interferon-γ and sequence

Interferon-γ

Interferon-γ, is also known as type II interferon, is a cytokine that is critical for innate and adaptive immunity against viral infections and some bacterial protozoal. Interferon-γ is known to be an important activator of macrophages and also inducer of Class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecule expression. In the case of aberrant interferon-γ expression a number of auto-inflammatory and autoimmune diseases have been observed. Interferon-γ has the ability to inhibit viral replication directly, and also has immune-stimulatory and immunomodulatory effects. Interferon-γ is known to be produced predominantly by natural killer (NK) and natural killer T (NKT) cells as part of the innate immune response, and by CD4 Th1 and CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) effector T cells once the antigen-specific immunity complex develops 47. Moreover; interferon-γ is also known to be produced by non-cytotoxic innate lymphoid cells (ILC) which is a family of immune cells first discovered in the early 2010's 48. It has been observed that interferon-γ is secreted by T helper cells (specifically, Th1 cells), cytotoxic T cells (TC cells), mucosal epithelial cells, macrophages, and NK cells. Interferon-γ is the only Type II interferon and it is serologically distinct from Type I interferons. The properties of interferon-γ can be summarized to: a) immunoregulatory, b) antiviral, and c) anti-tumor properties 49. Interferon-γ is responsible for the transcription of 30 genes which produce a variety of physiological and cellular responses. The most important effects are: a) Promotion of Natural Killer cell activity, b) Increase of antigen presentation and lysosome activity of macrophages, c) Activation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), d) Induction of the production of IgG2a and IgG3 from activated plasma B cells, e) Cause normal cells to increase expression of class I MHC molecules as well as class II MHC on antigen-presenting cells—to be specific. This occurs through induction of antigen processing genes, including subunits of the immunoproteasome (MECL1, LMP2, LMP7), f) Promotion of adhesion and binding required for leukocyte migration, h) Induction of the expression of intrinsic defense factors—for example, with respect to retroviruses, relevant genes include tripartite motif-containing protein 5(TRIM5alpha), apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like (APOBEC), and tetherin, representing directly antiviral effects. T helper cells1 cells are known to interferon-γ, which in turn causes more undifferentiated CD4+cells (Th0 cells) to differentiate into Th1 cells 47, and in turn represent a positive feedback loop—which suppress Th2 cell differentiation. The natural killer cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells also known to produce interferon-γ. Interferon-γ is known to suppress osteoclast formation by rapidly degrading the nuclear factor-kappa B (RANKadaptor) protein TNF receptor associated factor (TRAF6) in the RANK-RANK-L (ligand) signaling pathway, which otherwise stimulates the production of NF-κB (Table 1).
Table 1

Recent published studies on interferon-γ

Author PatientsAnimalsCell LinesInterferon-γ
Wang L. et. al.--Deficiency
Liu S. et. al. --Specific expression
Ragaghi A. et. al. --Specific expression
Kim A. et. al. --Specific expression
Djaafar S. et. al. --Interferon-γ-inducible chemokines
In the study by Wang L. et al. 50 it was observed that deficiency of interferon-gamma or its receptor promotes colorectal cancer development. In the study by Liu S. et al. 51 it was observed that specific expression of interferon-γ induced by synergistic activation mediator-derived (SAM) systems activates innate immunity and inhibits tumorigenesis. In the study by Razaghi A. et al. 52 improved therapeutic efficacy of mammalian expressed-recombinant interferon gamma against ovarian cancer cells was observed. In the study by Li Z. et al. 53 it was observed that anti-VEGFR-interferon-α2 regulates the tumor microenvironment and exhibits potent antitumor efficacy against colorectal cancer. In the study by Katlinsky K.V. et al. 54 it was observed that inactivation of interferon receptor promotes the establishment of immune privileged tumor microenvironment. In the study by Djaafar S. et al. 55 it was observed that enoxaparin attenuates mouse colon cancer liver metastases by inhibiting heparanase and interferon-γ-inducible chemokines. In the study by Radice E. et al. 56 it was observed that low-doses of sequential-kinetic-activated interferon-γ enhance the ex vivo cytotoxicity of peripheral blood natural killer cells from patients with early-stage colorectal cancer.

Discussion

Interferon-γ is known to have a potential use in immunotherapy. To date interferon-γ is not approved yet for the treatment in any cancer immunotherapy. However, improved survival has been observed when it was administrated to patients with bladder carcinoma and melanoma cancers. The most promising result were obsreved in patients with stage 2 and 3 of ovarian carcinoma. It is known that the in vitro study of interferon-γ in cancer cells is more extensive. Moreover; results indicate an anti-proliferative activity of IFN-gamma leading to the growth inhibition or cell death, and apoptosis through autophagy 57. New evidence suggests that interferon-γ expression is regulated by a pseudoknotted element in its 5' UTR 58. There is also evidence that interferon-γ is regulated either directly or indirectly by the microRNAs: miR-29 59. Furthermore, it has been observed that interferon-γ expression is regulated via glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in T-cells. This interaction takes place in the 3'UTR, where binding of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase prevents the translation of the mRNA sequence 60. The local microenvironment in the surgical site is affected by the surgical technique as it was previously observed. 61 Surgical and not analgesic technique affects postoperative inflammation following colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective, randomized study 61. In the study by Zhao X. et al. 62 it was observed that the location of the CRC plays a crucial role in the inflammatory cytokines that are being secreted locally. In the study by Wang H. et al. 63 a new prognostic factor and treatment target was suggested and this was the programmed death-ligand-2 (PD-L2) expression. In the study by Chen X. et al. 64 it was suggested that PD-L1 expression could be a possible future treatment target. In the study by Van Der Kraak L. et al. 65 it was observed that pretreatment with immunotherapy can upregulate the programmed death pathway making it a new treatment option. In any case there should be a balance between the inflammatory cytokines, they can either up-regulate the local environment in favor of tumorigenesis or inhibit tumorigenesis. The authors suggest a measurement of interferon-γ levels before admission of therapy (any therapy) and based on these levels additionally possibly low doses of interferon-γ could be administered.
  65 in total

Review 1.  Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm.

Authors:  Subhra K Biswas; Alberto Mantovani
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 25.606

2.  Effector memory T cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Franck Pagès; Anne Berger; Matthieu Camus; Fatima Sanchez-Cabo; Anne Costes; Robert Molidor; Bernhard Mlecnik; Amos Kirilovsky; Malin Nilsson; Diane Damotte; Tchao Meatchi; Patrick Bruneval; Paul-Henri Cugnenc; Zlatko Trajanoski; Wolf-Herman Fridman; Jérôme Galon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis.

Authors:  Daniela F Quail; Johanna A Joyce
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 4.  Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape.

Authors:  Gavin P Dunn; Allen T Bruce; Hiroaki Ikeda; Lloyd J Old; Robert D Schreiber
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 25.606

5.  The tumor microenvironment at a glance.

Authors:  Frances R Balkwill; Melania Capasso; Thorsten Hagemann
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  The origin and function of tumor-associated macrophages.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Xuetao Cao
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.530

Review 7.  The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer.

Authors:  Raghu Kalluri
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Hypoxia is important in the biology and aggression of human glial brain tumors.

Authors:  Sydney M Evans; Kevin D Judy; Isolde Dunphy; W Timothy Jenkins; Wei-Ting Hwang; Peter T Nelson; Robert A Lustig; Kevin Jenkins; Deirdre P Magarelli; Stephen M Hahn; Ruth A Collins; M Sean Grady; Cameron J Koch
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Survivin is released from cancer cells via exosomes.

Authors:  Salma Khan; Jessica M S Jutzy; Jonathan R Aspe; Dalmor W McGregor; Jonathan W Neidigh; Nathan R Wall
Journal:  Apoptosis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 10.  Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis.

Authors:  Johanna A Joyce; Jeffrey W Pollard
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 60.716

View more
  11 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal neuroimmune disruption in a mouse model of Gulf War illness.

Authors:  Siomara Hernandez; David E Fried; Vladimir Grubišić; Jonathon L McClain; Brian D Gulbransen
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Identification and Validation of Prognostic Model for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Based on Necroptosis-Related Genes.

Authors:  Haoran Xie; Jingxian Xu; Zhiwen Xie; Ni Xie; Jiawei Lu; Lanting Yu; Baiwen Li; Li Cheng
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Master Transcription Regulators and Transcription Factors Regulate Immune-Associated Differences Between Patients of African and European Ancestry With Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Parvathi A Myer; Hyunjin Kim; Anna M Blümel; Ellen Finnegan; Alexander Kel; Taylor V Thompson; John M Greally; Jochen Hm Prehn; Darran P O'Connor; Richard A Friedman; Aris Floratos; Sudipto Das
Journal:  Gastro Hep Adv       Date:  2022

4.  The Interferon-Gamma Paradox in Cancer.

Authors:  M Raza Zaidi
Journal:  J Interferon Cytokine Res       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.607

5.  Data Driven Mathematical Model of Colon Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Arkadz Kirshtein; Shaya Akbarinejad; Wenrui Hao; Trang Le; Sumeyye Su; Rachel A Aronow; Leili Shahriyari
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Anti-tumor effects of PEGylated-nanoliposomes containing ginger extract in colorectal cancer-bearing mice.

Authors:  Maryam Yavari; Mahmoud Reza Jaafari; Farshad Mirzavi; Ghasem Mosayebi; Ali Ghazavi; Ali Ganji
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.532

7.  A Clinical-Genetic Score to Identify Surgically Resected Colorectal Cancer Patients Benefiting From an Adjuvant Fluoropyrimidine-Based Therapy.

Authors:  Elena De Mattia; Eva Dreussi; Marcella Montico; Sara Gagno; Chiara Zanusso; Luca Quartuccio; Salvatore De Vita; Michela Guardascione; Angela Buonadonna; Mario D'Andrea; Nicoletta Pella; Adolfo Favaretto; Enrico Mini; Stefania Nobili; Loredana Romanato; Erika Cecchin; Giuseppe Toffoli
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 8.  Interferon gamma in cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Ling Ni; Jian Lu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Periostin in Angiogenesis and Inflammation in CRC-A Preliminary Observational Study.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kula; Miriam Dawidowicz; Sylwia Mielcarska; Paweł Kiczmer; Magdalena Chrabańska; Magdalena Rynkiewicz; Elżbieta Świętochowska; Dariusz Waniczek
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Development of a lipid metabolism-related gene model to predict prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Hong Xu; Jian Sun; Ling Zhou; Qian-Cheng Du; Hui-Ying Zhu; Yang Chen; Xin-Yu Wang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.337

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.