| Literature DB >> 29344159 |
Yao Cheng1, Zhe Qiao1, Chengxue Dang2, Bin Zhou1, Shaomin Li1, Wei Zhang1, Jiantao Jiang1, Yongchun Song2, Jin Zhang1, Dongmei Diao2.
Abstract
p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling has been implicated in the cancer development and progression. However, the precise mechanism of this association remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between p38 and cancer progression, including investigations into the effects on cell proliferation, resistance to thalidomide, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) expression and prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer. The present retrospective study included patients with stage I-III esophageal cancer. A total of 228 patients with esophageal cancer were recruited to analyze the expression of phosphorylated (p)-p38 and IDO in tumor, and normal tissues through immunohistochemistry. Depression status was measured using the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale. P38 cDNA was transfected into esophageal cancer cells to assess tumor cell viability, sensitivity to thalidomide treatment and IDO gene expression. Western blotting and flow cytometry was used to analyze protein expression alterations, and apoptosis in esophageal cancer cells. P-p38 protein was expressed in 68.9% of cancer tissues, and was significantly associated with depressive symptoms, tumor recurrence and poor survival of patients. In vitro experiments revealed that the expression of p-p38 induced esophageal cancer Eca-109 and TE-1 cell viability, and resistance to thalidomide treatment, as well as in the expression of IDO without the application of lipopolysaccharides. Further follow-up of patients revealed that depression was also an independent factor for early recurrence and overall survival rate. Altered p38 MAPK expression was associated with poor outcome in patients with esophageal cancer. p38 may be a potential biomarker for the prediction of depressive symptoms and prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer.Entities:
Keywords: depression; esophageal cancer; p38
Year: 2017 PMID: 29344159 PMCID: PMC5754885 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.7129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1.Immunohistochemical analysis of p-p38 expression in (A) EC and (B) paired normal tissue samples. Positive staining is indicated by a brown nuclear color. Kaplan-Meier curve analyses for (C) disease-free and (D) overall survival of patients with EC with regards to p-p38. Kaplan-Meier curve analyses for (E) disease-free and (F) overall survival of patients with EC with regards to depression. EC, esophageal cancer; cum, cumulative.
Associations between p38 expression and clinicopathological features from patients with esophageal cancer (n=228).
| Variables | No. of cases | p-p38-positive | P-value (univariate) | P-value (multivariate) | Risk ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 0.116 | ||||
| ≤59 | 134 | 86 (64.1) | |||
| >59 | 94 | 71 (75.5) | |||
| Sex | 0.08 | ||||
| Male | 177 | 127 (71.8) | |||
| Female | 51 | 30 (58.8) | |||
| Histological types | 0.558 | ||||
| Squamous | 206 | 142 (68.9) | |||
| Adenocarcinoma | 22 | 15 (68.2) | |||
| Invasion | 0.032 | 0.171 | |||
| T1 | 22 | 12 (54.5) | |||
| T2 | 31 | 18 (58.1) | |||
| T3 | 131 | 92 (70.2) | |||
| T4 | 38 | 33 (86.8) | |||
| Lymph node | 0.048 | 0.955 | |||
| N0 | 127 | 83 (65.4) | |||
| N1 | 83 | 59 (71.1) | |||
| N2 | 18 | 15 (83.3) | |||
| Metastasis | 0.024 | 0.086 | |||
| Negative | 212 | 144 (67.9) | |||
| Positive | 16 | 13 (81.2) | |||
| Depression status | 0.001 | 0.040 | 2.382 (0.503–2.978) | ||
| None | 38 | 16 (42.1) | |||
| Mild | 31 | 15 (48.4) | |||
| Modest | 76 | 59 (77.6) | |||
| Severe | 60 | 47 (78.3) | |||
| Chemotherapy | 0.323 | ||||
| CR | 16 | 12 (75.0) | |||
| PR | 64 | 43 (67.2) | |||
| SD | 40 | 27 (67.5) | |||
| PD | 70 | 57 (81.4) | |||
| Recurrence | 0.003 | 0.38 | |||
| OS | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.903 (0.029–12.623) |
CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; OS, overall survival time.
Log-rank and Cox proportional hazards regression model of prognostic variables for progress free survival of patients with esophageal cancer.
| Prognostic variable | P-value (univariate) | P-value (multivariate) | Risk ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | <0.001 | 0.376 | |
| Sex | 0.243 | ||
| Stage (IA-IV) | <0.001 | 0.264 | |
| p38 | <0.001 | 0.008 | 1.534 (0.256–6.814) |
| T | <0.001 | 0.001 | 1.186 (0.359–4.886) |
| N | <0.001 | 0.914 | |
| M | <0.001 | 0.025 | 4.245 (0.158–9.617) |
| Depression status | <0.001 | 0.056 | |
| Mild | 0.327 | ||
| Modest | 0.045 | 0.433 (0.361–5.377) | |
| Severe | 0.001 | 0.455 (0.216–13.365) | |
| Chemotherapy | 0.01 | 0.497 |
T, tumor; N, node; M, metastasis; CI, confidence interval.
Log-Rank and Cox proportional hazards regression model of prognostic variables for overall survival of patients with esophageal cancer.
| Prognostic variable | P-value (univariate) | P-value (multivariate) | Risk ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 0.001 | 0.273 | |
| Sex | 0.433 | ||
| Stage (IA-IV) | <0.01 | 0.129 | |
| p38 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 1.677 (0.238–4.717) |
| T | <0.01 | 0.212 | |
| N | <0.01 | 0.754 | |
| M | <0.01 | 0.001 | 3.66 (0.406–10.192) |
| Depression status | <0.01 | 0.002 | |
| Mild | 0.128 | ||
| Modest | 0.02 | 0.433 (0.361–5.377) | |
| Severe | <0.01 | 0.455 (0.216–13.365) | |
| Chemotherapy | <0.01 | <0.01 | 1.551 (0.106–17.219) |
T, tumor; N, node; M, metastasis; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2.Effects of p38 expression on the regulation of esophageal cancer cell viability. Cell proliferation on MTT assay in esophageal cancer (A) Eca-109 and (B) TE-1 cells. Medium glucose detection in different expression levels of p38 on (C) Eca-109 and (D) TE-1 cells. Effect of 2-DG treatment on the growth of (E) Eca-109 and (F) TE-1 cells with different expression levels of p38. *P<0.05. 2-DG, 2-deoxy-D-glucose.
Figure 3.Effects of p38 expression on the regulation of tumor cell sensitivity to thalidomide treatment. MTT assay for the survival rate of (A) Eca-109 and (B) TE-1 cells. (C) Flow cytometric apoptosis assay of Eca-109 and TE-1 cells. (D) Western blotting for Ku80 expression following treatment with or without thalidomide in cells with different p38 expression levels. (E) p38 expression in esophageal cancer cells is positively associated with IDO expression. Ku80, Ku autoantigen 80 kDa; p, phosphorylated; IDO, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PI, propidium iodide.