Literature DB >> 29344148

Identification of potentially critical differentially methylated genes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A comprehensive analysis of methylation profiling and gene expression profiling.

Lian Hui1, Jingru Zhang1, Xiaoxu Ding1, Xing Guo1, Xuejun Jang1.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to identify potentially critical differentially methylated genes associated with the progression of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methylation profiling data of GSE62336 deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database were used to identify differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and differentially methylated CpG islands (DMIs). Concurrently, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using a meta-analysis of three gene expression datasets (GSE53819, GSE13597 and GSE12452). Subsequently, methylated DEGs were identified by comparing DMRs and DEGs. Furthermore, functional associations of these methylated DEGs were analyzed via constructing a functional network using GeneMANIA prediction server. In total, 1,676 hypermethylated genes, 28 hypomethylated genes, 17 DMIs and 2,983 DEGs (1,655 upregulated and 1,328 downregulated) were identified. Among these DEGs, 135 downregulated genes were hypermethylated; of these, dual specificity phosphatase 6 (DUSP6) and tenascin XB (TNXB) contained DMIs. In the functional network, 154 genes and 1,651 association pairs were included. DUSP6 was predicted to exhibit genetic interactions with other hypermethylated DEGs such as malic enzyme 3 and ST3 β-galactoside α-2,3-sialyltransferase 5; TNXB was predicted to be co-expressed with a set of hypermethylated DEGs, including EPH receptor B6, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member L1 and glutathione peroxidase 3. The hypermethylated DEGs may be involved in the progression of NPC, and they may become novel therapeutic targets for NPC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  differentially expressed gene; functional network; methylation; nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Year:  2017        PMID: 29344148      PMCID: PMC5754830          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.7083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), a malignant tumor arising from the epithelium of the nasopharynx, is the most prevalent in southern China (1). In Hong Kong, the incidence of NPC is as high as 0.02–0.03% in males and 0.01–0.02% in females (2). Although the classic treatment of high-dose radiotherapy plus adjunctive chemotherapy is able to achieve a 5-year survival rate of 80%, recurrence and metastasis may occur, which are the primary causes of mortality (3). Therefore, it is necessary to identify molecular biomarkers for NPC prognosis and targeted therapy. Aberrant DNA methylation usually leads to the occurrence of tumors. CpG island promoter hypermethylation and global DNA hypomethylation are the characteristics of the cancer epigenome (4,5). In NPC, aberrant methylation has been considered as the most frequent event for gene silencing: For example, a previous study identified that abnormal methylation on chromosome 6p occurs in 76.9% of patients with early-stage NPC, based on the comparative methylome analysis (6). Furthermore, tumor-suppressor genes such as protocadherin 8 (PCDH8), FEZ family zinc finger 2 (FEZF2) and argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS1) have been previously demonstrated to be frequently methylated in NPC, which promotes NPC cell migration, and are associated with poorer clinical outcomes (7–9). With the exception of DNA methylation, the differential expression of genes is also frequently detected in NPC: A previous study demonstrated that the overexpression of branched-chain-amino-acid aminotransferase cytosolic (BCAT1) protein in NPC at different pathological stages and BCAT1 deficiency reduced tumor cell proliferation and decreased cell migration and invasion abilities (10). Recently, upregulation of Kelch domain containing 4 (KLHDC4) was demonstrated to result in poor overall and metastasis-free survival rates, and the deletion of KLHDC4 significantly induced the spontaneous apoptosis of NPC cells (11). However, the molecular mechanisms of NPC remain incompletely understood. There have been no studies that have comprehensively analyzed differentially expressed methylated genes using array data from multiple platforms. In the present study, methylation profiling data in the dataset GSE62336 (6), sourced from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, were used to identify differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and differentially methylated CpG islands (DMIs). Concurrently, compared with differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that were identified using a meta-analysis of three gene expression datasets (GSE53819, GSE13597 and GSE12452) (12–14), differentially methylated genes were identified. Additionally, a functional network consisting of the differentially methylated genes was constructed to reveal the potential functional associations of those genes. These results may provide novel information for the study of molecular mechanisms underlying NPC and provide potential therapeutic targets for NPC.

Materials and methods

Data acquisition

Methylation profiling data from the dataset GSE62336 (6) were downloaded from GEO (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) (15). A total of 25 primary NPC tumors and non-tumor counterparts were included in this dataset, and the data were produced on the platform of Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip (GPL13534, HumanMethylation450_15017482) (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Three gene expression profiling datasets (GSE53819, GSE13597 and GSE12452) were obtained from GEO. In the GSE53819 dataset (13), 18 primary NPC tumors and 18 non-cancerous nasopharyngeal tissues were included; the median ages were 46 years (range, 19–77 years) for patients with NPC, and 45 years (range, 18–78 years) for the non-cancerous cohort; almost one third of patients were females; all samples were collected prior to any anticancer treatment. Data in the GSE53819 dataset were produced on the platform of Agilent-014850 Whole Human Genome Microarray 4×44 K G4112F (Probe Name version; GPL6480; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara CA, USA). The GSE13597 dataset (14) contained data of 25 histologically confirmed undifferentiated NPC tissues and 3 non-malignant nasopharyngeal controls, which were produced on the platform of [HG-U133A] Affymetrix Human Genome U133A Array (GPL96) (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). Additionally, the GSE12452 dataset (12) contained 31 NPC tumor samples and 10 normal healthy nasopharyngeal tissues, data of which were produced on the platform of [HG-U133_Plus_2] Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array (GPL570) (Affymetrix, Inc.).

Data preprocessing

The downloaded raw data were preprocessed. For the methylation data in GSE62336, documents of normalized average β-value were downloaded. The β-mixture quantile normalization method (BMIQ) (16) was utilized to preprocess β-values. Due to different platforms being used for the three gene expression profiling datasets, two different methods were utilized for data preprocessing. For the gene expression data in the GSE13597 and GSE12452 datasets, raw gene expression data were preprocessed using the method of robust microarray analysis in Affy package (version 1.46.1; https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/3.1/bioc/html/affy.html) in R (17). The preprocessing steps included background correction, quantile normalization and calculation of expression. By contrast, Limma (version 3.24.15; https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/3.1/bioc/html/limma.html) package (18) in R was applied to preprocess raw data in the GSE53819 dataset. The preprocessing steps included background correction, normalization between arrays and concentration of microarray data. Following this, an annotation file of the platform corresponding to each dataset was used for the transformation of probe identities into gene symbols. If one probe corresponded to multiple genes, the expression value of this probe would be removed. However, if multiple probes corresponded to a certain gene, the mean expression value was defined as the final expression value of the gene.

Prediction of DMRs and DMIs

DMRs between NPC and normal samples were predicted using COHCAP package (version 1.6.0; http://www.bioconductor.org/pacages/3.1/bioc/html/COHCAP.html) (19) in R. Briefly, based on the β-value file of CpG site probes, Δβ, P-value and adjusted P-value of NPC and normal samples were calculated by COHCAP. Only regions with |Δβ|>0.1 and adjusted P<0.05 were identified as DMRs. Furthermore, the COHCAP package was also utilized to predict DMIs. CpG island statistics were calculated by averaging β-values among samples per site and comparing the average β-values across groups. If the number of DMRs in the CpG island was >4, this CpG island was identified as a DMI.

Identification of DEGs using meta-analysis

MetaDE package (version 1.1.6; http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.11/bioc/html/metahdep.html) (20) in R was applied to integrate DEGs in the three gene expression profiling datasets. Briefly, a heterogeneity test for each gene under different platforms was firstly performed to evaluate whether each gene was homogeneous and unbiased. If the parameter tau2=0 and Qpval>0.05 (tau2 is used to estimate amount of heterogeneity; Qpval represents P-value of Qval test statistics; and Q is a statistical magnitude in statistics), the gene was homogeneous and unbiased. Then, the differential expression of the genes was analyzed. Only genes with P<0.05 were considered significant. Finally, the relative fold-change (FC) in expression of each gene between the NPC tissues samples and normal control samples was calculated. Collectively, genes with P<0.05 were identified as DEGs.

Gene Ontology (GO) functional and pathway enrichment analyses

The gene functional analysis tool Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) (21) was used to perform GO [including biological process (BP), cell component (CC) and molecular function (MF)] and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses of DEGs. Only the GO and pathway terms with gene count ≥2 and P<0.05 were considered significant.

Selection of DEGs with DMRs

Based on the gene symbols corresponding to the DMRs and identified DEGs, the overlapped genes between genes with hypermethylated DMRs and downregulated DEGs, and the genes with hypomethylated DMRs and upregulated DEGs were selected.

Functional association analysis of the DEGs with DMRs

The GeneMANIA prediction server (22,23) (http://apps.cytoscape.org/download/stats/genemania/), a plugin in Cytoscape software (version 3.2.1; National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA), was utilized to analyze the correlations among the identified DEGs that had DMRs, based on a large set of functional association data, including protein and genetic interactions, co-expression, co-localization pathways, and protein domain similarity.

Results

Statistics of DMRs, DMIs and DEGs

In total, 2,262 probes of DMRs were obtained, including 2,234 hypermethylated CpG site probes corresponding to 1,676 gene symbols and 28 hypomethylated CpG site probes corresponding to 28 gene symbols. Furthermore, 2,983 DEGs were identified, including 1,655 upregulated and 1,328 downregulated genes. Additionally, 17 DMIs were identified, and all of them were hypermethylated in the NPC samples compared with their methylation status in the controls (Fig. 1). Among them, dual specificity phosphatase 6 (DUSP6) and tenascin XB (TNXB) were also identified as DEGs.
Figure 1.

Heatmap of the 17 DMIs. Each row represents a gene that contains DMI, and each column represents a tissue sample. Green indicates hypomethylated, while red indicates hypermethylated. DMIs, differentially methylated CpG islands.

Significant pathways enriched by DEGs

In order to investigate the potential pathways associated with the identified DEGs, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was conducted. The upregulated DEGs were primarily associated with pathways in cancer, oxidative phosphorylation and the cell cycle (Fig. 2A). The downregulated DEGs were primarily associated with the regulation of actin cytoskeleton, chemokine signaling pathway and focal adhesion (Fig. 2B).
Figure 2.

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway terms that were significantly enriched by differentially expressed genes. Pathway terms enriched by (A) upregulated and (B) downregulated genes. hsa, Homo sapiens.

Overlapped genes between genes with DMRs and DEGs

In order to reveal whether the genes with DMRs were DEGs, genes with DMRs were compared with DEGs. It was identified that 135 genes with hypermethylated DMRs were downregulated in the NPC samples compared with their expression levels in the normal controls, including prostaglandin D2 synthase, elongation factor for RNA polymerase II 3, ATPase sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ transporting 3 and claudin 3 (Table I).
Table I.

Information regarding the downregulated genes containing hypermethylated regions.

Site IDChrLocGeneIslandMean log2FC[a]Mean β-value in NPC samplesMean β-value in normal samplesΔβ (NPC vs. normal)FDR (NPC vs. normal)
cg204503181165415260SIPA1chr11:65413778-65415203−0.726.57×10−14.65×10−11.92×10−11.30×10−4
cg179533001165418265chr11:65419853-654205275.91×10−14.57×10−11.34×10−12.33×10−3
cg169158281173371940PLEKHB1chr11:73371800-73372632−0.596.19×10−14.31×10−11.88×10−12.93×10−5
cg072231801320989142CRYL1chr13:20989007-20989836−0.625.98×10−14.63×10−11.35×10−15.69×10−5
cg211774261537386586MEIS2chr15:37387386-37387614−0.826.28×10−14.68×10−11.60×10−11.70×10−5
cg243612651544068668ELL3chr15:44068586-44069792−1.246.36×10−14.32×10−12.04×10−12.51×10−5
cg067860501684401247ATP2C2chr16:84401957-84402497−0.825.58×10−14.36×10−11.22×10−11.21×10−4
cg268247801689004908CBFA2T3chr16:89006334-89008600−0.875.95×10−14.73×10−11.23×10−16.23×10−6
cg09013975173847872ATP2A3chr17:3847999-3848570−1.066.68×10−14.90×10−11.78×10−14.51×10−5
cg052479141935629701FXYD1chr19:35632356-35632572−0.626.76×10−14.83×10−11.93×10−13.71×10−5
cg030781691935629791chr19:35632356-356325726.31×10−14.79×10−11.52×10−14.40×10−5
cg274611961935630106chr19:35632356-356325725.59×10−14.51×10−11.08×10−11.81×10−4
cg163347952142538894BACE2chr21:42539367-42540872−0.866.06×10−14.51×10−11.55×10−11.58×10−5
cg08481491  3125900108ALDH1L1chr3:125898662-125899568−0.805.85×10−14.46×10−11.38×10−11.04×10−4
cg04161526  631696519DDAH2chr6:31695894-31698245−0.635.65×10−14.33×10−11.32×10−12.25×10−5
cg21286967  631696710chr6:31695894-316982456.01×10−14.71×10−11.30×10−13.27×10−5
cg25526039  6107813291SOBPchr6:107810066-107812733−0.815.53×10−14.36×10−11.17×10−14.45×10−4
cg24419391  773183516CLDN3chr7:73183379-73185115−1.025.89×10−14.67×10−11.21×10−11.64×10−3
cg08580268  7150038502RARRES2chr7:150037459-150039031−0.945.66×10−13.95×10−11.71×10−19.63×10−5
cg27494647  7150038898chr7:150037459-1500390316.14×10−14.15×10−11.99×10−17.82×10−5
cg11714502  9130640212AK1chr9:130639738-130640143−0.615.71×10−14.47×10−11.24×10−15.00×10−4
cg02156769  9139872246PTGDSchr9:139872237-139873143−1.815.58×10−14.56×10−11.01×10−11.95×10−5
cg07390373  X43741933MAOBchrX:43741299-43741827−0.785.96×10−14.88×10−11.08×10−13.94×10−5
cg05605944  X43741945chrX:43741299-437418275.84×10−14.62×10−11.22×10−11.72×10−5

This table lists the genes with |log2 FC|>0.58. Site ID, probe identity of CpG site; Chr, chromosome where probe is located; Loc, location of probe; FC, fold-change; NPC, nasopharyngeal carcinoma; FDR, false discovery rate.

However, the 28 genes with hypomethylated DMRs were not differentially expressed between the two group samples.

Functional associations of the DEGs with DMRs

In order to reveal the potential functional associations among the above 135 hypermethylated DEGs, a functional network was constructed (Fig. 3). In the network, 154 genes and 1,651 association pairs were included. The association pairs included 1,155 co-expression associations, 24 physical interactions, 351 genetic interactions, 83 co-localization associations and 38 associations between shared protein domains. For example, DUSP6 was predicted to exhibit genetic interactions with other hypermethylated DEGs such as malic enzyme 3 (ME3) and ST3 β-galactoside α-2,3-sialytansferase 5 (ST3GAL5); TNXB was predicted to be co-expressed with genes such as EPH receptor B6 (EPHB6), aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member L1 (ALDH1L1) and glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPX3).
Figure 3.

Functional network displaying functional associations of the 135 differentially hypermethylated genes. Green nodes with red outer ring represent the downregulated genes containing hypermethylated regions, while grey nodes represent the non-differentially expressed genes.

According to the enrichment analysis, the 135 hypermethylated DEGs were significantly associated with the GO functions of protein amino acid phosphorylation and phosphate metabolic process, and the tight junction pathway (Table II).
Table II.

Results of GO and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses of the 135 downregulated genes containing hypermethylated regions.

CategoryTermP-valueGene countGenes
BPGO:0006468~protein amino acid phosphorylation0.002114STK10, DRD4, PTPRA, MKNK2, PRKCH, ADRBK1, FES, TRIB2, CSNK2A2, EPHB6, TNK2, CD6, MAP3K12, AKT2
GO:0006796~phosphate metabolic process0.008716STK10, DRD4, EPM2A, PTPRA, MKNK2, PRKCH, ADRBK1, FES, TRIB2, CSNK2A2, EPHB6, TNK2, CD6, MAP3K12, AKT2, DUSP6
GO:0006793~phosphorus metabolic process0.008716STK10, DRD4, EPM2A, PTPRA, MKNK2, PRKCH, ADRBK1, FES, TRIB2, CSNK2A2, EPHB6, TNK2, CD6, MAP3K12, AKT2, DUSP6
GO:0016310~phosphorylation0.009614STK10, DRD4, PTPRA, MKNK2, PRKCH, ADRBK1, FES, TRIB2, CSNK2A2, EPHB6, TNK2, CD6, MAP3K12, AKT2
GO:0006357~regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter0.011313CDKN1C, GATA2, SORBS3, MEIS2, E2F4, CRTC1, TFAP2B, GFI1, TCEA2, LRRFIP1, ELL3, NtnxbR0B1, ZBTB38
CCGO:0044459~plasma membrane part0.011827FXYD1, OCLN, CLDN3, SLC6A20, DRD4, ADRBK1, PRR7, SORBS3, EPHB6, ANK1, ST3GAL5, ITGB7, GRIN2D, CD6, SLC43A1, KCNQ1, SLC1A1, HCN2, CR1, PTPRA, MAOB, TSPAN13, ACTN3, LSP1, AP2A2, MPL, SPTAN1
GO:0005887~integral to plasma membrane0.016617FXYD1, HCN2, CR1, CLDN3, SLC6A20, DRD4, PTPRA, TSPAN13, EPHB6, ST3GAL5, GRIN2D, ITGB7, MPL, CD6, KCNQ1, SLC1A1, SLC43A1
GO:0031226~intrinsic to plasma membrane0.020117FXYD1, HCN2, CR1, CLDN3, SLC6A20, DRD4, PTPRA, TSPAN13, EPHB6, ST3GAL5, GRIN2D, ITGB7, MPL, CD6, KCNQ1, SLC1A1, SLC43A1
GO:0005626~insoluble fraction0.024713DES, JPH2, BACE2, GRIN2D, EPHX1, TSPAN13, ADRBK1, LTC4S, NR0B1, SLC1A1, MAP3K12, SPTAN1, AKT2
GO:0000267~cell fraction0.033615JPH2, TSPAN13, EPHX1, ADRBK1, LTC4S, NR0B1, DES, BACE2, GRIN2D, GPX3, SLC1A1, MAP3K12, AKT2, SPTAN1, DUSP6
MFGO:0008134~transcription factor binding0.000913ZNF274, E2F4, CRTC1, NR0B1, GATA2, SORBS3, MEIS2, DIP2C, NCOA4, GPX3, TFAP2B, SOX17, DDAH2
GO:0048037~cofactor binding0.0156  7SDHA, CRYL1, ME3, ALDH1L1, ACADS, GPT, OAT
GO:0005200~structural constituent of cytoskeleton0.0220  4SORBS3, ANK1, DES, SPTAN1
GO:0004672~protein kinase activity0.024711CSNK2A2, EPHB6, STK10, MKNK2, PRKCH, ADRBK1, TNK2, FES, MAP3K12, TRIB2, AKT2
Pathwayhsa04530: Tight junction0.0036  7CSNK2A2, OCLN, CLDN3, PRKCH, ACTN3, SPTAN1, AKT2

BP, biological process; CC, cell component; MF, molecular function; GO, Gene Ontology; hsa, Homo sapiens.

Discussion

In the present study, 2,234 hypermethylated CpG site probes corresponding to 1,676 gene symbols, 28 hypomethylated CpG site probes corresponding to 28 gene symbols and 17 DMIs were identified based on analysis of the methylation profiling dataset. Furthermore, 2,983 DEGs (1,655 upregulated and 1,328 downregulated) were identified based on the three gene expression profiling datasets. Among these DEGs, 135 downregulated genes were hypermethylated, including DUSP6 and TNXB, which were also among the 17 DMIs identified. DUSP6 encodes dual specificity phosphatase 6, also termed mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase 3, which belongs to the dual specificity protein phosphatase subfamily (24). Phosphatases in this family inactivate their target kinases, such as members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase superfamily, which are involved in cellular proliferation and differentiation (25). In the present study, DUSP6 was identified to be hypermethylated and downregulated in NPC samples compared with its methylation status in the normal controls, which was consistent with other studies (14,26). DUSP6 has been identified as a tumor suppressor, and it is able to inhibit epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cell invasion by negatively modulating the activity of extracellular-signal-regulated kinase in NPC (26). In the present study, DUSP6 was predicted to exhibit genetic interactions with other hypermethylated DEGs such as ME3 and ST3GAL5. ME3 is a mitochondrial nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate(+) -dependent enzyme (27), and it serves a unique role in tumor mitochondria (28). The protein encoded by ST3GAL5 is a sialyltransferase, a type II membrane protein that catalyzes the formation of α-2,3-sialyltransferase (GM3), a protein participating in cell differentiation and cell adhesion (29). There is no other evidence to indicate the associations of ME3 and ST3GAL5 with NPC at present. Therefore, ME3 and ST3GAL5 may be potential novel biomarker molecules in the progression of NPC. TNXB was also identified to be hypermethylated and downregulated in NPC samples compared with its methylation status in the normal controls, which was consistent with previous studies (6,12). In Epstein-Barr virus-positive gastric cancer and pancreatic cancer, TNXB was also hypermethylated (30,31). TNXB encodes a tenascin, which exhibits an anti-adhesive effect (32). It is able to promote EMT by activating latent transforming growth factor-β (33). In malignancy, TNXB is usually suppressed, and it has been identified as a marker for malignant mesothelioma (34). Furthermore, in the present study, TNXB was predicted to be co-expressed with a set of other hypermethylated DEGs, including EPHB6, ALDH1L1 and GPX3. EPH receptor B6 (EPHB6) encodes a transmembrane protein, which may affect cell adhesion and migration. In tumor progression, EPHB6 is usually downregulated due to promoter DNA hypermethylation (35,36). It has been suggested that EPHB6 alters invasiveness, and is associated with the prognosis and/or diagnosis of breast carcinoma (35,37). ALDH1L1 and GPX3 have been previously identified to be silenced by methylation, which is associated with tumorigenesis (38,39). Although there is no experimental evidence to confirm the involvement of EPHB6, ALDH1L1 and GPX3 in NPC, the present study hypothesizes that these molecules may also serve a significant role in the progression of NPC, along with TNXB. Additionally, there are several limitations in the present study. The expression levels and methylation status of the aforementioned genes are required to be validated using experiments. Functional associations of these genes also need to be confirmed. These validations will be performed and presented separately. Despite the absence of experiments, several genes such as ME3, ST3GAL5, EPHB6, ALDH1L1 and GPX3 were primarily identified to be potentially associated with NPC, and they may become novel therapeutic targets for NPC, once validated. In conclusion, based on the comprehensive analysis of methylation profiling and gene expression profiling, 135 downregulated genes were identified to be hypermethylated in NPC compared with its methylation status in the controls in the present study. Among them, DUSP6 and TNXB contained DMIs. Hypermethylated DEGs that exhibited genetic interactions with DUSP6, including ME3 and ST3GAL5, and genes that co-expressed with TNXB, including EPHB6, ALDH1L1 and GPX3, may be potential novel molecules involved in the progression of NPC, and they may become novel therapeutic targets for NPC.
  37 in total

Review 1.  Genetic predisposition factors and nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk: a review of epidemiological association studies, 2000-2011: Rosetta Stone for NPC: genetics, viral infection, and other environmental factors.

Authors:  Allan Hildesheim; Cheng-Ping Wang
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 15.707

2.  Chromosomal localization of three human dual specificity phosphatase genes (DUSP4, DUSP6, and DUSP7).

Authors:  A Smith; C Price; M Cullen; M Muda; A King; B Ozanne; S Arkinstall; A Ashworth
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 5.736

3.  The EPHB6 receptor tyrosine kinase is a metastasis suppressor that is frequently silenced by promoter DNA hypermethylation in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jun Yu; Etmar Bulk; Ping Ji; Antje Hascher; Moying Tang; Ralf Metzger; Alessandro Marra; Hubert Serve; Wolfgang E Berdel; Rainer Wiewroth; Steffen Koschmieder; Carsten Müller-Tidow
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Epigenetic Silencing of ALDH1L1, a Metabolic Regulator of Cellular Proliferation, in Cancers.

Authors:  Natalia V Oleinik; Natalia I Krupenko; Sergey A Krupenko
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2011-02

5.  EphB6 receptor significantly alters invasiveness and other phenotypic characteristics of human breast carcinoma cells.

Authors:  B P Fox; R P Kandpal
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  FEZF2, a novel 3p14 tumor suppressor gene, represses oncogene EZH2 and MDM2 expression and is frequently methylated in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Xing-Sheng Shu; Lili Li; Mingfang Ji; Yingduan Cheng; Jianming Ying; Yichao Fan; Lan Zhong; Xiaodong Liu; Sai Wah Tsao; Anthony T C Chan; Qian Tao
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Genome-wide identification of Epstein-Barr virus-driven promoter methylation profiles of human genes in gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  Junhong Zhao; Qiaoyi Liang; Kin-Fai Cheung; Wei Kang; Raymond W M Lung; Joanna H M Tong; Ka Fai To; Joseph J Y Sung; Jun Yu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  GeneMANIA prediction server 2013 update.

Authors:  Khalid Zuberi; Max Franz; Harold Rodriguez; Jason Montojo; Christian Tannus Lopes; Gary D Bader; Quaid Morris
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Comparative methylome analysis in solid tumors reveals aberrant methylation at chromosome 6p in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei Dai; Arthur Kwok Leung Cheung; Josephine Mun Yee Ko; Yue Cheng; Hong Zheng; Roger Kai Cheong Ngan; Wai Tong Ng; Anne Wing Mui Lee; Chun Chung Yau; Victor Ho Fu Lee; Maria Li Lung
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Upregulation of KLHDC4 Predicts a Poor Prognosis in Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yi-Fan Lian; Jing Yuan; Qian Cui; Qi-Sheng Feng; Miao Xu; Jin-Xin Bei; Yi-Xin Zeng; Lin Feng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Genome-Wide Open Chromatin Methylome Profiles in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Muhiddin Ishak; Rashidah Baharudin; Isa Mohamed Rose; Ismail Sagap; Luqman Mazlan; Zairul Azwan Mohd Azman; Nadiah Abu; Rahman Jamal; Learn-Han Lee; Nurul Syakima Ab Mutalib
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-05-05

2.  Screening and bioinformatical analysis of differentially expressed genes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Weiqian Guo; Xiaomin Zheng; Lei Hua; Xianbin Zheng; Yangyang Zhang; Bin Sun; Zhenchao Tao; Jin Gao
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  Genome wide methylation profiling of selected matched soft tissue sarcomas identifies methylation changes in metastatic and recurrent disease.

Authors:  Ana Cristina Vargas; Lesley-Ann Gray; Christine L White; Fiona M Maclean; Peter Grimison; Nima Mesbah Ardakani; Fiona Bonar; Elizabeth M Algar; Alison L Cheah; Peter Russell; Annabelle Mahar; Anthony J Gill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A Four-Gene Signature Model Improves the Prediction of Distant Metastasis in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Three-Center Observational Study.

Authors:  Jinyuan Si; Xiuyong Ding; Zhuoxia Deng; Pu Li; Benjian Zhang; Guiping Lan; Bo Huang; Jinhui Liang; Zhenlin Wang; Yongfeng Si
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

5.  Integrative analysis of promising molecular biomarkers and pathways for coronary artery disease using WGCNA and MetaDE methods.

Authors:  Shilin Yan
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.952

6.  Epigenome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiling in Colorectal Cancer and Normal Adjacent Colon Using Infinium Human Methylation 450K.

Authors:  Rashidah Baharudin; Muhiddin Ishak; Azliana Muhamad Yusof; Sazuita Saidin; Saiful Effendi Syafruddin; Wan Fahmi Wan Mohamad Nazarie; Learn-Han Lee; Nurul-Syakima Ab Mutalib
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14

7.  Identification of RRAS gene related to nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on pathway and network-based analyses.

Authors:  Ruowen Xiao; Lu Shi; Te Yang; Meiyin Zhang; Huiyun Wang; Shijuan Mai
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.