Literature DB >> 29343662

Cost-Benefit Performance Simulation of Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery As Required for Financial Viability under the 2016 Revised Reimbursement Paradigm of the Japanese National Health Insurance System.

Naohiro Kajiwara1,2, Yasufumi Kato1, Masaru Hagiwara1, Masatoshi Kakihana1, Tatsuo Ohira1, Norihiko Kawate2, Norihiko Ikeda1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To discuss the cost-benefit performance (CBP) and establish a medical fee system for robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) under the Japanese National Health Insurance System (JNHIS), which is a system not yet firmly established.
METHODS: All management steps for RATS are identical, such as preoperative and postoperative management. This study examines the CBP based on medical fees of RATS under the JNHIS introduced in 2016.
RESULTS: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) now receive insurance reimbursement under the category of use of support devices for endoscopic surgery ($5420 and $3485, respectively). If the same standard amount were to be applied to RATS, institutions would need to perform at least 150 or 300 procedures thoracic operation per year to show a positive CBP ($317 per procedure as same of RALP and $130 per procedure as same of RAPN, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery in some areas receives insurance reimbursement for its "supportive" use for endoscopic surgery as for RALP and RAPN. However, at present, it is necessary to perform da Vinci Surgical System Si (dVSi) surgery at least 150-300 times in a year in a given institution to prevent a deficit in income.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Japanese National Health Insurance System; cost–benefit performance; da Vinci Surgical System; robot-assisted thoracic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29343662      PMCID: PMC5930259          DOI: 10.5761/atcs.oa.17-00094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1341-1098            Impact factor:   1.520


  16 in total

1.  New technology and health care costs--the case of robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Gabriel I Barbash; Sherry A Glied
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Maximizing use of robot-arm no. 3 in daVinci-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Naohiro Kajiwara; Junichi Maeda; Koichi Yoshida; Yasufumi Kato; Masaru Hagiwara; Masatoshi Kakihana; Tatsuo Ohira; Norihiko Kawate; Norihiko Ikeda
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-05

3.  Early experience using the da Vinci Surgical System for the treatment of mediastinal tumors.

Authors:  Naohiro Kajiwara; Masahiro Taira; Koichi Yoshida; Masaru Hagiwara; Masatoshi Kakihana; Jitsuo Usuda; Osamu Uchida; Tatsuo Ohira; Norihiko Kawate; Norihiko Ikeda
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-10-08

4.  Defining the cost of care for lobectomy and segmentectomy: a comparison of open, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and robotic approaches.

Authors:  Shaun A Deen; Jennifer L Wilson; Candice L Wilshire; Eric Vallières; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Robson E Ely; Brian E Louie
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Cost-Benefit Performance of Robotic Surgery Compared with Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery under the Japanese National Health Insurance System.

Authors:  Naohiro Kajiwara; James Patrick Barron; Yasufumi Kato; Masatoshi Kakihana; Tatsuo Ohira; Norihiko Kawate; Norihiko Ikeda
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 1.520

6.  Appropriate set-up of the da Vinci Surgical System in relation to the location of anterior and middle mediastinal tumors.

Authors:  Naohiro Kajiwara; Masatoshi Kakihana; Norihiko Kawate; Norihiko Ikeda
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-11-16

7.  Comparison of robotic and nonrobotic thoracoscopic thymectomy: a cohort study.

Authors:  Jens C Rückert; Marc Swierzy; Mahmoud Ismail
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: results from a multihospital database (Premier).

Authors:  Scott J Swanson; Daniel L Miller; Robert Joseph McKenna; John Howington; M Blair Marshall; Andrew C Yoo; Matthew Moore; Candace L Gunnarsson; Bryan F Meyers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Comparative effectiveness of robotic-assisted vs thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  Subroto Paul; Jessica Jalbert; Abby J Isaacs; Nasser K Altorki; O Wayne Isom; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database.

Authors:  Michael Kent; Thomas Wang; Richard Whyte; Thomas Curran; Raja Flores; Sidhu Gangadharan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  2 in total

1.  Current status of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.

Authors:  Masato Kanzaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Development of a robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) program. Lessons learned after 2500 cases.

Authors:  Luis Herrera; Juan Escalon; Matthew Johnston; Alexis Sanchez; Renata Sanchez; Ivan Mogollon
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-06-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.