Literature DB >> 29343623

Identifying DNA methylation biomarkers for non-endoscopic detection of Barrett's esophagus.

Helen R Moinova1, Thomas LaFramboise2,3, James D Lutterbaugh1, Apoorva Krishna Chandar1, John Dumot1, Ashley Faulx1, Wendy Brock1, Omar De la Cruz Cabrera4, Kishore Guda2, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan2, Prasad G Iyer5, Marcia I Canto6, Jean S Wang7, Nicholas J Shaheen8, Prashanti N Thota9, Joseph E Willis10,11,12, Amitabh Chak13,2,12, Sanford D Markowitz13,2,3,12.   

Abstract

We report a biomarker-based non-endoscopic method for detecting Barrett's esophagus (BE) based on detecting methylated DNAs retrieved via a swallowable balloon-based esophageal sampling device. BE is the precursor of, and a major recognized risk factor for, developing esophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopy, the current standard for BE detection, is not cost-effective for population screening. We performed genome-wide screening to ascertain regions targeted for recurrent aberrant cytosine methylation in BE, identifying high-frequency methylation within the CCNA1 locus. We tested CCNA1 DNA methylation as a BE biomarker in cytology brushings of the distal esophagus from 173 individuals with or without BE. CCNA1 DNA methylation demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.95 for discriminating BE-related metaplasia and neoplasia cases versus normal individuals, performing identically to methylation of VIM DNA, an established BE biomarker. When combined, the resulting two biomarker panel was 95% sensitive and 91% specific. These results were replicated in an independent validation cohort of 149 individuals who were assayed using the same cutoff values for test positivity established in the training population. To progress toward non-endoscopic esophageal screening, we engineered a well-tolerated, swallowable, encapsulated balloon device able to selectively sample the distal esophagus within 5 min. In balloon samples from 86 individuals, tests of CCNA1 plus VIM DNA methylation detected BE metaplasia with 90.3% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity. Combining the balloon sampling device with molecular assays of CCNA1 plus VIM DNA methylation enables an efficient, well-tolerated, sensitive, and specific method of screening at-risk populations for BE.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29343623      PMCID: PMC5789768          DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aao5848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   19.319


  66 in total

1.  Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or cardia.

Authors:  Amitabh Chak; Ashley Faulx; Charis Eng; William Grady; Margaret Kinnard; Heather Ochs-Balcom; Gary Falk
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Adherens junctions associated protein 1 serves as a predictor of recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Haruyoshi Tanaka; Mitsuro Kanda; Masahiko Koike; Naoki Iwata; Dai Shimizu; Kazuhiro Ezaka; Satoshi Sueoka; Yuri Tanaka; Hideki Takami; Ryoji Hashimoto; Chie Tanaka; Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Goro Nakayama; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 5.650

3.  The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence.

Authors:  Heiko Pohl; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Detection of DNA hypermethylation in sera of patients with Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Jin-Han Bae; Jongha Park; Kwang Mo Yang; Tae-Oh Kim; Joo Mi Yi
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.952

5.  DNA methylation status of key cell-cycle regulators such as CDKNA2/p16 and CCNA1 correlates with treatment response to doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced breast tumors.

Authors:  Jovana Klajic; Florence Busato; Hege Edvardsen; Nizar Touleimat; Thomas Fleischer; Ida Bukholm; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Per Eystein Lønning; Jörg Tost; Vessela N Kristensen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  DNA methylation biomarker candidates for early detection of colon cancer.

Authors:  Joo Mi Yi; Mashaal Dhir; Angela A Guzzetta; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Kyu Heo; Kwang Mo Yang; Hiromu Suzuki; Minoru Toyota; Hwan-Mook Kim; Nita Ahuja
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-01-12

7.  A Panel of Novel Detection and Prognostic Methylated DNA Markers in Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Serum DNA.

Authors:  Akira Ooki; Zahra Maleki; Jun-Chieh J Tsay; Chandra Goparaju; Mariana Brait; Nitesh Turaga; Hae-Seong Nam; William N Rom; Harvey I Pass; David Sidransky; Rafael Guerrero-Preston; Mohammad Obaidul Hoque
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shaheen; Gary W Falk; Prasad G Iyer; Lauren B Gerson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 9.  Oesophageal adenocarcinoma and gastric cancer: should we mind the gap?

Authors:  Yoku Hayakawa; Nilay Sethi; Antonia R Sepulveda; Adam J Bass; Timothy C Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Integrated genomic characterization of oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  50 in total

1.  Novel Screening Alternatives for Barrett Esophagus.

Authors:  Apoorva Krishna Chandar; Anamay Sharma; Amitabh Chak
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-05

Review 2.  Guideline on screening for esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Stéphane Groulx; Heather Limburg; Marion Doull; Scott Klarenbach; Harminder Singh; Brenda J Wilson; Brett Thombs
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  New Screening Methods for Barrett Esophagus.

Authors:  Michael S Smith
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-11

4.  Is Mass Screening for Barrett's Esophagus a Myth or Reality?

Authors:  Prashanthi N Thota; Amitabh Chak
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 11.382

5. 

Authors:  Stéphane Groulx; Heather Limburg; Marion Doull; Scott Klarenbach; Harminder Singh; Brenda J Wilson; Brett Thombs
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Diagnosis: Biomarkers and balloons for the detection of Barrett oesophagus.

Authors:  Katrina Ray
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 7.  Screening for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: recent advances.

Authors:  Don C Codipilly; Yi Qin; Sanford M Dawsey; John Kisiel; Mark Topazian; David Ahlquist; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 8.  Role of TFF3 as an adjunct in the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus using a minimally invasive esophageal sampling device-The CytospongeTM.

Authors:  Anna L Paterson; Marcel Gehrung; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Maria O'Donovan
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 1.582

Review 9.  Endoscopic Screening for Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Rationale, Candidates, and Challenges.

Authors:  Amrit K Kamboj; David A Katzka; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2020-10-21

10.  ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASIA: A DECADE OF EVOLUTION.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2020
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.