| Literature DB >> 29342950 |
Yu Qiao1, Shuhan Li2, Wenhui Liu3, Meiqing Ran4, Haifei Lu5, Yingping Yang6.
Abstract
Organic-inorganic lead halide based perovskite solar cells have received broad interest due to their merits of low fabrication cost, a low temperature solution process, and high energy conversion efficiencies. Rare-earth (RE) ion doped nanomaterials can be used in perovskite solar cells to expand the range of absorption spectra and improve the stability due to its upconversion and downconversion effect. This article reviews recent progress in using RE-ion-doped nanomaterials in mesoporous electrodes, perovskite active layers, and as an external function layer of perovskite solar cells. Finally, we discuss the challenges facing the effective use of RE-ion-doped nanomaterials in perovskite solar cells and present some prospects for future research.Entities:
Keywords: downconversion; perovskite solar cells; rare-earth (RE) ion doped nanomaterials; upconversion
Year: 2018 PMID: 29342950 PMCID: PMC5791130 DOI: 10.3390/nano8010043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Structure of perovskite solar cells: (a) meso-porous structure; (b) planar pin junction structure.
Figure 2The detailed energy-level diagram and corresponding upconversion process of a hexagonal β-NaYF4:Yb3+, Er3+ nanoparticle.
Figure 3(a1) Schematic of the J–V characteristic curves measurement of the perovskite solar cells under the simulated sunlight excitation; (a2) J–V curves of the perovskite solar cells: LiYF4:2% Yb3+, 1% Er3+ crystals, LiYF4:2% Yb3+ crystals, and no crystal measured under simulated solar illumination with an intensity of 0.73 W·cm−2; (a3) Enhancement efficiencies (EE) of the perovskite solar cells and silicon solar cells with LiYF4:2% Yb3+, 1% Er3+ crystals dependent on the excitation power density. Reproduced with permission from [22]. American Chemical Society, 2016; (b1) J–V curves of the best-performing PSC, solar cell with SiO2@Er2O3, solar cell with mCu2−S@SiO2, and solar cell with mCSE composites under simulated AM 1.5, 100 mW·cm−2 irradiance (simulated sunlight); (b2) IPCE curves of the best-performing PSC; (b3) Schematic illustration of the energy transfer process in CH3NH3PbI3 solar cells using mCSE composites. Reproduced with permission from [29]. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017; (c1) J–V curves measured under AM 1.5 G of planar PSCs with different UCNCs additive amounts; (c2) IPCE spectra of UC-20 and pristine planar PSCs; inset is the magnification of 800–1100 nm region; (c3) Schematic energy transfer within a UCNCs-embedded planar PSC device. Reproduced with permission from [35]. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017.
Scheme 1(a) Schematic preparation of hydrophilic IR806-UCNCs via a two-step ligand-exchange process. Reproduced with permission from [34]. Elsevier B.V, 2017; (b) Schematic preparation of UCNCs-embedded perovskite film via a ligand-exchange process. Reproduced with permission from [35]. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017.
Figure 4The schematic diagram of DC luminescence (① cross-relaxation ② energy transfer). (A) DC on a single ion by emission of two visible photons; (B–D) The possibility of DC on two ions. Reproduced with permission from [37]. The American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1999.
Summary of the devices of application of RE-doped nanomaterials in PSC.
| RE-Doped Nanomaterials | Device Structure | Application Mode | PCE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiYF4:Yb3+, Er3+ | LiYF4:Yb3+, Er3+/FTO/TiO2/MAPbI3/HTM/Au | As external function layer, at the reverse of the FTO glass of PSCs | 11.87% [ |
| NaYF4:Yb3+, Er3+ | cmTiO2/NaYF4:Yb3+, Er3+/MAPbI3/HTM/Ag | As mesoporous layer | 17.8% [ |
| NaYF4:Yb3+, Er3+ | cm TiO2/NaYF4:Yb3+, Er3+-mp TiO2/MAPbI3/HTM/Au | As mesoporous layer (mixed with m-TiO2) | 15.98% [ |
| β-NaYF4:Yb3+, Tm3+@NaYF4 (NYTY@N) | cm TiO2/NYTY@N-mp TiO2/MAPbI3/HTM/Ag | As mesoporous layer (mixed with m-TiO2) | 16.9% [ |
| β-NaYF4:Yb3+, Er3+@SiO2 (NYEY@S) | cm TiO2/NYEY@S-mp TiO2/MAPbI3/C | As mesoporous layer (mixed with m-TiO2) | 9.92% [ |
| mCu2-xS@SiO2@Er2O3 (mCSE) | cm TiO2/mCSE-mp TiO2/MAPbI3/HTM/Au | As mesoporous layer (mixed with m-TiO2) | 17.8% [ |
| TiO2:Er3+, Yb3+ | cm TiO2/TiO2:Er3+, Yb3+NRs/MAPbI3−xClx/HTM/Au | As mesoporous layer | 13.4% [ |
| IR806-NaYF4:Yb, Er | cm ZnO/IR806-NaYF4:Yb, Er+MAPbI3/HTM/Ag | Coupled with perovskite by ligand-exchange strategy | 17.49% [ |
| β-NaYF4:Yb, Er | cm ZnO/NaYF4:Yb, Er-MAPbI3/HTM/Ag | Coupled with perovskite by ligand-exchange strategy | 19.70% [ |
| CeO2:Eu3+ | cm TiO2/CeO2:Eu3+-mp TiO2/MAPbI3/HTM/Ag | As mesoporous layer (mixed with m-TiO2) | 10.8% [ |
| Eu-complex LDL | Eu-complex LDL/FTO/cm TiO2/mp TiO2/MAPbI3/HTM/Au | As external function layer, at the reverse of the FTO glass of PSCs | 15.44% [ |