B G Taib1, J Oakley2, Y Dailey3, I Hodge4, P Wright2, R du Plessis5, J Rylands6, D Taylor-Robinson7, S Povall8, A Schache9, R Shaw9, A Dingle10, T M Jones9. 1. Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK. 2. Cheshire West and Chester Public Health Team, Chester, UK. 3. Public Health North West England, Cheshire and Merseyside PHE Centre, Liverpool, UK. 4. Cheshire and Merseyside Strategic Clinical Networks, Stockton Heath, Warrington, UK. 5. Cheshire and Merseyside Collaborative Service, Bromborough, Wirral, UK. 6. Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK. 7. Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 8. Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 9. Northwest Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 10. Cheshire and Merseyside Strategic Clinical Networks, Sci-Tech Daresbury, Daresbury, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this longitudinal study was to examine the distribution of head and neck cancer (HANC) disease burden across the region comparing it to national trends. DESIGN: We undertook a retrospective study of routine data combining it with indicators of deprivation and lifestyle at small geographical areas within the 9 Local Authorities (LAs) of Merseyside and Cheshire Network (MCCN) for head and neck cancers. Data from the North West of England and England were used as comparator regions. SETTING: This research was undertaken by the Cheshire and Merseyside Public Health Collaborative, UK. PARTICIPANTS: The Merseyside and Cheshire region serves a population of 2.2 million. Routine data allowed us to identify HANC patients diagnosed with cancers coded ICD C00-C14 and C30-C32 within 3 cohorts 1998-2000, 2008-2010 and 2009-2011 for our analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Directly age-standardised incidence rates and directly age-standardised mortality rates in the LAs and comparator regions were measured. Lifestyle and deprivation indicators were plotted against them and measured by Pearson's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The incidence of head and neck cancer has increased across the region from 1998-2000 to 2008-2010 with a peak incidence for Liverpool males at 35/100 000 population. Certain Middle Super Output Areas contribute disproportionately to the significant effect of incidence and mortality within LAs. Income deprivation had the strongest correlation with incidence (r = .59) and mortality (r = .53) of head and neck cancer. CONCLUSION: Our study emphasises notable geographical variations within the region which need to be addressed through public health measures.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this longitudinal study was to examine the distribution of head and neck cancer (HANC) disease burden across the region comparing it to national trends. DESIGN: We undertook a retrospective study of routine data combining it with indicators of deprivation and lifestyle at small geographical areas within the 9 Local Authorities (LAs) of Merseyside and Cheshire Network (MCCN) for head and neck cancers. Data from the North West of England and England were used as comparator regions. SETTING: This research was undertaken by the Cheshire and Merseyside Public Health Collaborative, UK. PARTICIPANTS: The Merseyside and Cheshire region serves a population of 2.2 million. Routine data allowed us to identify HANC patients diagnosed with cancers coded ICD C00-C14 and C30-C32 within 3 cohorts 1998-2000, 2008-2010 and 2009-2011 for our analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Directly age-standardised incidence rates and directly age-standardised mortality rates in the LAs and comparator regions were measured. Lifestyle and deprivation indicators were plotted against them and measured by Pearson's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The incidence of head and neck cancer has increased across the region from 1998-2000 to 2008-2010 with a peak incidence for Liverpool males at 35/100 000 population. Certain Middle Super Output Areas contribute disproportionately to the significant effect of incidence and mortality within LAs. Income deprivation had the strongest correlation with incidence (r = .59) and mortality (r = .53) of head and neck cancer. CONCLUSION: Our study emphasises notable geographical variations within the region which need to be addressed through public health measures.
Keywords:
alcohol; deprivation; head and neck cancer; incidence; lifestyle; lower super output area; middle super output area; mortality; smoking; socioeconomic deprivation; socioeconomic status
Authors: Nicholas Clarke; Simon Dunne; Laura Coffey; Linda Sharp; Deirdre Desmond; Jean O'Conner; Eleanor O'Sullivan; Conrad Timon; Claire Cullen; Pamela Gallagher Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2021-01-09 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Sam Burton; Jo-Anne Puddephatt; Laura Baines; Florence Sheen; Jasmine G Warren; Andrew Jones Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 2.826