Literature DB >> 29339245

Systematic review and evaluation of aspartame carcinogenicity bioassays using quality criteria.

Lois Haighton1, Ashley Roberts2, Brandon Walters2, Barry Lynch2.   

Abstract

The current review assessed cancer studies of aspartame based on a quality appraisal using the Klimisch grading system. Nine studies having complete histopathology were included: three 2-year studies by Searle; three transgenic mice studies by the NTP; three lifetime studies by the Ramazzini Institute. A tenth study limited to brain tumors was not rated. None were determined as Klimisch Code 1 (reliable without restrictions). The Searle studies predated GLP standards but their methodology was comparable; transgenic mouse models are not validated, but are accepted as supporting data. These studies were rated Klimisch Code 2 (reliable with restrictions). The Ramazzini Institute used a lifetime model of their own design that has been questioned due to high rates of spontaneous tumors, issues with tumor type diagnosis and concerns about the impact of chronic infections. As many of these problems could be attributed to using animals that died or were terminated near end of life, along with the other problems noted, these studies were rated Klimisch Code 3 (not reliable). As the Klimisch Code 2 studies demonstrated a lack of carcinogenic potential, and as aspartame is hydrolyzed to common components and lacks genotoxic activity, a conclusion that aspartame is not carcinogenic is supported.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aspartame; Bioassays; Cancer; Klimisch rating; Quality appraisal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29339245     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  3 in total

1.  High Concentrations of Aspartame Induce Pro-Angiogenic Effects in Ovo and Cytotoxic Effects in HT-29 Human Colorectal Carcinoma Cells.

Authors:  Anca Laura Maghiari; Dorina Coricovac; Iulia Andreea Pinzaru; Ioana Gabriela Macașoi; Iasmina Marcovici; Sebastian Simu; Dan Navolan; Cristina Dehelean
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 2.  Aspartame-True or False? Narrative Review of Safety Analysis of General Use in Products.

Authors:  Kamila Czarnecka; Aleksandra Pilarz; Aleksandra Rogut; Patryk Maj; Joanna Szymańska; Łukasz Olejnik; Paweł Szymański
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Charlotte Debras; Eloi Chazelas; Bernard Srour; Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo; Younes Esseddik; Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi; Cédric Agaësse; Alexandre De Sa; Rebecca Lutchia; Stéphane Gigandet; Inge Huybrechts; Chantal Julia; Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot; Benjamin Allès; Valentina A Andreeva; Pilar Galan; Serge Hercberg; Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy; Mathilde Touvier
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 11.069

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.