Literature DB >> 29339115

Toddler drinks, formulas, and milks: Labeling practices and policy implications.

Jennifer L Pomeranz1, Maria J Romo Palafox2, Jennifer L Harris2.   

Abstract

Toddler drinks are a growing category of drinks marketed for young children 9-36 months old. Medical experts do not recommend them, and public health experts raise concerns about misleading labeling practices. In the U.S., the toddler drink category includes two types of products: transition formulas, marketed for infants and toddlers 9-24 months; and toddler milks, for children 12-36 months old. The objective of this study was to evaluate toddler drink labeling practices in light of U.S. food labeling policy and international labeling recommendations. In January 2017, we conducted legal research on U.S. food label laws and regulations; collected and evaluated toddler drink packages, including nutrition labels and claims; and compared toddler drink labels with the same brand's infant formula labels. We found that the U.S. has a regulatory structure for food labels and distinct policies for infant formula, but no laws specific to toddler drinks. Toddler drink labels utilized various terms and images to identify products and intended users; made multiple health and nutrition claims; and some stated there was scientific or expert support for the product. Compared to the same manufacturer's infant formula labels, most toddler drink labels utilized similar colors, branding, logos, and graphics. Toddler drink labels may confuse consumers about their nutrition and health benefits and the appropriateness of these products for young children. To support healthy toddler diets and well-informed decision-making by caregivers, the FDA can provide guidance or propose regulations clarifying permissible toddler drink labels and manufacturers should end inappropriate labeling practices.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Food labeling; Food policy; Formulas; Infant formula; Milks; Public health; Toddler drinks; Toddler feeding; U.S. law and policy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29339115     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  11 in total

1.  The Impact of Toddler Milk Claims on Beliefs and Misperceptions: A Randomized Experiment with Parents of Young Children.

Authors:  Ana Paula C Richter; Emily W Duffy; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Jennifer L Harris; Jennifer L Pomeranz; Marissa G Hall
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 4.910

2.  Marketing of sugar-sweetened children's drinks and parents' misperceptions about benefits for young children.

Authors:  Frances Fleming-Milici; Lindsay Phaneuf; Jennifer L Harris
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.660

3.  Prevalence, duration, and content of television advertisements for breast milk substitutes and commercially produced complementary foods in Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Dakar, Senegal.

Authors:  Mary Champeny; Kroeun Hou; Elhadji Issakha Diop; Ndeye Yaga Sy Gueye; Alissa M Pries; Elizabeth Zehner; Jane Badham; Sandra L Huffman
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Manganese levels in infant formula and young child nutritional beverages in the United States and France: Comparison to breast milk and regulations.

Authors:  Seth H Frisbie; Erika J Mitchell; Stéphane Roudeau; Florelle Domart; Asuncion Carmona; Richard Ortega
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Parental Perceptions and Exposure to Advertising of Toddler Milk: A Pilot Study with Latino Parents.

Authors:  Emily W Duffy; Lindsey S Taillie; Ana Paula C Richter; Isabella C A Higgins; Jennifer L Harris; Marissa G Hall
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-10       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Toddler milk perceptions and purchases: the role of Latino ethnicity.

Authors:  Emily W Duffy; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Ana Paula C Richter; Isabella Ca Higgins; Jennifer L Harris; Marissa G Hall
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.022

7.  A commentary on the carbon footprint of milk formula: harms to planetary health and policy implications.

Authors:  Julie P Smith
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.461

8.  Infant formula and toddler milk marketing and caregiver's provision to young children.

Authors:  Maria J Romo-Palafox; Jennifer L Pomeranz; Jennifer L Harris
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Old Tricks, New Opportunities: How Companies Violate the International Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes and Undermine Maternal and Child Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Constance Ching; Paul Zambrano; Tuan T Nguyen; Manisha Tharaney; Maurice Gerald Zafimanjaka; Roger Mathisen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  First-food systems transformations and the ultra-processing of infant and young child diets: The determinants, dynamics and consequences of the global rise in commercial milk formula consumption.

Authors:  Phillip Baker; Thiago Santos; Paulo Augusto Neves; Priscila Machado; Julie Smith; Ellen Piwoz; Aluisio J D Barros; Cesar G Victora; David McCoy
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.