Literature DB >> 29338855

Vitrified blastocyst transfer cycles with the use of only vaginal progesterone replacement with Endometrin have inferior ongoing pregnancy rates: results from the planned interim analysis of a three-arm randomized controlled noninferiority trial.

Kate Devine1, Kevin S Richter2, Eric A Widra2, Jeffrey L McKeeby2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the noninferiority of vaginal P (Endometrin) compared with daily intramuscular P for replacement in programmed vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles and to assess the noninferiority of vaginal P in combination with intramuscular progesterone every third day compared with daily intramuscular P.
DESIGN: Three-arm randomized controlled noninferiority study. To enable early recognition of inferiority if present, an a priori interim analysis was planned and completed once ongoing pregnancy data were available for 50% of the total enrollment goal. The results of this interim analysis are presented here.
SETTING: Assisted reproduction technology practice. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing transfer of nonbiopsied high quality vitrified-warmed blastocyst(s) in a programmed cycle. INTERVENTION(S): Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer with mode of P replacement determined by randomization to either: (1) 50 mg daily intramuscular P only; (2) 200 mg twice daily vaginal Endometrin; or (3) 200 mg twice daily Endometrin plus 50 mg intramuscular P every 3rd day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth. The primary outcome of this interim analysis was ongoing pregnancy. RESULT(S): A total of 645 cycles were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment arms, received at least one dose of P replacement therapy according to this assignment and underwent vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer. These cycles were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The study team, including the statistician, were blinded to the identity of the treatment arms, which were randomly labeled "A," "B," and "C" in the dataset. Ongoing pregnancy occurred in 50%, 47%, and 31% of cycles in arms A, B, and C respectively. Although arm C had an rate of positive hCG equivalent to the other two arms, the rate of pregnancy loss for arm C was significantly higher than for either of the two arms, resulting in a more than one-third lower rate of ongoing pregnancy. There were no statistically significant differences for any outcome tested between arms A and B. Results of a per-protocol analysis were nearly identical to those of the intention-to-treat analysis. On completion of these analyses, arm C was revealed to be the vaginal P only arm. CONCLUSION(S): Relative to regimens inclusive of intramuscular P, vaginal-only P replacement for vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer results in decreased ongoing pregnancy, due to increased miscarriage, and should be avoided. Randomization to the vaginal-only arm was terminated with these findings. This trial is ongoing to assess the noninferiority of the vaginal plus every 3rd day intramuscular P arm compared with daily intramuscular P in terms of live birth. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NLM identifier NCT02254577.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ART; Progesterone; frozen embryo transfer; vitrification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29338855     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  20 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian manipulation in ART: going beyond physiological standards to provide best clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Israel Ortega; Juan A García-Velasco; Antonio Pellicer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Comparison of daily vaginal progesterone gel plus weekly intramuscular progesterone with daily intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase support in single, autologous euploid frozen-thawed embryo transfers.

Authors:  Mehmet Resit Asoglu; Cem Celik; Lale Susan Karakis; Necati Findikli; Meral Gultomruk; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Relationship between serum progesterone (P) levels and pregnancy outcome: lessons from artificial cycles when using vaginal natural micronized progesterone.

Authors:  Elena Labarta
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Natural cycles achieve better pregnancy outcomes than artificial cycles in non-PCOS women undergoing vitrified single-blastocyst transfer: a retrospective cohort study of 6840 cycles.

Authors:  Jing Li; Qian Sun; Meng Zhang; Xiao Fu; Yiting Zhang; Shanshan Gao; Jinlong Ma
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  When Should We Freeze Embryos? Current Data for Fresh and Frozen Embryo Replacement IVF Cycles.

Authors:  Michail Kalinderis; Kallirhoe Kalinderi; Garima Srivastava; Roy Homburg
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Intramuscular progesterone versus 8% Crinone vaginal gel for luteal phase support following blastocyst cryopreserved single embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer B Bakkensen; Catherine Racowsky; Ann M Thomas; Andrea Lanes; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2020-07-01

7.  Measuring serum estradiol and progesterone one day prior to frozen embryo transfer improves live birth rates.

Authors:  Snigdha Alur-Gupta; Margaret Hopeman; Dara S Berger; Kurt T Barnhart; Suneeta Senapati; Clarisa Gracia
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2020-04-14

8.  Measuring the serum progesterone level on the day of transfer can be an additional tool to maximize ongoing pregnancies in single euploid frozen blastocyst transfers.

Authors:  Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin; Meral Gultomruk; Emre Turgut; Berfu Demir; Necati Findikli; Munevver Serdarogullari; Onder Coban; Zalihe Yarkiner; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 9.  The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Authors:  Ernesto Bosch; Michel De Vos; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Preparation of the Endometrium for Frozen Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sezcan Mumusoglu; Mehtap Polat; Irem Yarali Ozbek; Gurkan Bozdag; Evangelos G Papanikolaou; Sandro C Esteves; Peter Humaidan; Hakan Yarali
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.