| Literature DB >> 29338788 |
Eliana Amati1, Omar Perbellini1, Gianluca Rotta2, Martina Bernardi1,3, Katia Chieregato1,3, Sabrina Sella1, Francesco Rodeghiero3, Marco Ruggeri1, Giuseppe Astori4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are a heterogeneous population of multipotent progenitors used in the clinic because of their immunomodulatory properties and their ability to differentiate into multiple mesodermal lineages. Although bone marrow (BM) remains the most common MSC source, cord blood (CB) can be collected noninvasively and without major ethical concerns. Comparative studies comprehensively characterizing the MSC phenotype across several tissue sources are still lacking. This study provides a 246-antigen immunophenotypic analysis of BM- and CB-derived MSC aimed at identifying common and strongly expressed MSC markers as well as the existence of discriminating markers between the two sources.Entities:
Keywords: Angiotensin-converting enzyme; Bone marrow; CD143; Cord blood; Flow cytometry; Hematopoietic progenitor cell marker; High-throughput screening; Immunophenotype; Lyoplate; Mesenchymal stromal cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29338788 PMCID: PMC5771027 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-017-0755-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther ISSN: 1757-6512 Impact factor: 6.832
Fig. 1Common MSC marker identification. a Marker classification according to unsupervised HCL. Heat-map expression of the 59 markers selected by HCL on both bone marrow (BM)- and cord blood (CB)-MSC samples. Antigen expression level is color coded from white (no expression) to red (strong expression). Data are presented as log2 FI (median fluorescence intensity on the isotype control). Markers are shown according to four clusters of expression (no expression: cluster 1; low expression: cluster 2; intermediate expression: cluster 3; strong expression: cluster 4), with clusters identified with different shades of gray; CB-MSC samples are shown in blue; BM-MSC samples in green; bulk samples in red; single clones in yellow. b Common MSC marker identification. Boxes extend from 25th percentile to the 75th percentile, the line in the middle represents the median value and the whiskers extend from minimum to maximum values. ISCT-positive and negative markers are shown in grey. Abbreviations: HCL, hierarchical clustering; FI, fold increase
Fig. 3Differentially expressed markers between bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSC) and cord blood mesenchymal stromal cells (CB-MSC). a Heat-map expression of the three differentially expressed markers: CD130, CD141, and hematopoietic progenitor cell marker (CD143/ACE). Antigen expression level is color coded from white (no expression) to red (very strong expression). b Boxes of expression extend from 25th percentile to the 75th percentile, the line in the middle represents the median value and the whiskers extend from minimum to maximum values. The boxes referred to the log2 fold increase (Log2FI) and % of positive (% pos) cells. The differences were computed by Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.01. Mean fluorescence intensity histograms of each marker are reported on the right. White histograms: BM-MSC; grey histograms: CB-MSC
Fig. 2Marker refinement according to % of positive cells and robust coefficient of variation (rCV). The common and highly expressed markers were further selected according to a % of positivity higher than 80% and a rCV < 4% for each sample
Fig. 4CD143 verification as a discriminating marker between adult and perinatal MSC sources. Dot plots of CD143 expression as FI in all the investigated MSC sources (adipose tissue (AT), umbilical cord (UC), bone marrow (BM), and cord blood (CB)). The differences were computed by Mann-Whitney U test, ***p < 0.0001. Black circles: adult MSC sources; white circles: perinatal MSC. ns not significant