| Literature DB >> 29338777 |
Syed Mustafa Ali1, Naveed Anjum2, Maged N Kamel Boulos3, Muhammad Ishaq2, Javariya Aamir2, Ghulam Rasool Haider2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Data quality is core theme of programme's performance assessment and many organizations do not have any data quality improvement strategy, wherein data quality dimensions and data quality assessment framework are important constituents. As there is limited published research about the data quality specifics that are relevant to the context of Pakistan's Tuberculosis control programme, this study aims at identifying the applicable data quality dimensions by using the 'fitness-for-purpose' perspective.Entities:
Keywords: Data quality; Data quality dimensions; Data quality improvement strategy; Informed decision-making; Management perspective; Test-based approach; Tuberculosis control programme
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29338777 PMCID: PMC5771188 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3161-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Fig. 1Profiling of respondents
Practical cases reflecting the concept of ‘Completeness’
| Practical cases | Percentage (%) | N |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patient records found in paper-based recording and reporting system does not match the number of records found on digital system | 45 | 19 |
| In the digital record of one patient, a valid data entry field is found vacant | 79 | 33 |
| Patient’s address is entered as Shehzad town | 69 | 29 |
| The contact number for patient is 0321413707 | 62 | 26 |
Practical cases reflecting the concept of ‘Accuracy’
| Practical cases | Percentage (%) | N |
|---|---|---|
| The Patient Identifier Number generated for Hafizabad-based patient is P-09-G002-142-16; however, the district code for Hafizabad is 11, not 09 | 57 | 24 |
| Two identical Patient Identifier Numbers with same names were found in records. They were entered by two different General Practitioners | 60 | 25 |
| The contact number for patient is 01234137098 | 57 | 24 |
Practical cases reflecting the concept of ‘Consistency’
| Practical cases | Percentage (%) | N |
|---|---|---|
| Records show that Patient ABC is registered as pulmonary case, while on follow up visit his services are recorded as extra-pulmonary case | 40 | 17 |
Practical cases reflecting the concept of ‘Vagueness’
| Practical cases | Percentage (%) | N |
|---|---|---|
| One record shows patient name as Kaki ( | 64 | 27 |
Practical cases reflecting the concept of ‘Uniqueness’
| Practical cases | Percentage (%) | N |
|---|---|---|
| Two identical Patient Identifier Numbers with same patient names were found in the records; however, both records were entered by the same General Practitioner | 64 | 27 |
| The opposite to duplicate is___________ | 74 | 31 |
Practical cases reflecting the concept of ‘Timeliness’
| Practical cases | Percentage (%) | N |
|---|---|---|
| For digital records, if patient is registered on 19th August 2016 and registration data reaches server on 25th August 2016 ( | 86 | 36 |