Jennifer B Unger1. 1. a Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Department of Preventive Medicine , University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine , Los Angeles , California , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Perceived discrimination has been associated with cigarette smoking and other substance use among members of disadvantaged minority groups. However, most studies have focused on a single minority group, have not considered the individual's attribution for the discrimination, and have not considered emerging tobacco products. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the associations between perceived discrimination and use of six tobacco products (cigarettes, e-cigarettes, cigars, pipe tobacco, hookah, and smokeless tobacco) in a diverse sample of 1,068 adults in the United States. METHODS: Participants were recruited on Amazon's Mechanical Turk and participated in an online survey. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between perceived discrimination and use of each tobacco product. Interactions between discrimination and demographic characteristics, and between discrimination and perceived reasons for discrimination, were evaluated. RESULTS: Controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and socioeconomic status, perceived discrimination was a risk factor for current use of five of the six tobacco products. These associations were consistent across racial/ethnic groups and regardless of the individual's attribution for the reason for the discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that perceived discrimination is a risk factor for the use of multiple tobacco products, and that this association is not limited to particular demographic groups or types of discrimination. Public health programs could potentially reduce tobacco-related disease by teaching healthier ways to cope with discrimination.
BACKGROUND: Perceived discrimination has been associated with cigarette smoking and other substance use among members of disadvantaged minority groups. However, most studies have focused on a single minority group, have not considered the individual's attribution for the discrimination, and have not considered emerging tobacco products. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the associations between perceived discrimination and use of six tobacco products (cigarettes, e-cigarettes, cigars, pipe tobacco, hookah, and smokeless tobacco) in a diverse sample of 1,068 adults in the United States. METHODS:Participants were recruited on Amazon's Mechanical Turk and participated in an online survey. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between perceived discrimination and use of each tobacco product. Interactions between discrimination and demographic characteristics, and between discrimination and perceived reasons for discrimination, were evaluated. RESULTS: Controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and socioeconomic status, perceived discrimination was a risk factor for current use of five of the six tobacco products. These associations were consistent across racial/ethnic groups and regardless of the individual's attribution for the reason for the discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that perceived discrimination is a risk factor for the use of multiple tobacco products, and that this association is not limited to particular demographic groups or types of discrimination. Public health programs could potentially reduce tobacco-related disease by teaching healthier ways to cope with discrimination.
Authors: Pebbles Fagan; Judith S Brook; Elizabeth Rubenstone; Chenshu Zhang; David W Brook Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-02-27 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: S Sean Hu; Linda Neff; Israel T Agaku; Shanna Cox; Hannah R Day; Enver Holder-Hayes; Brian A King Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Darrell L Hudson; Kai M Bullard; Harold W Neighbors; Arline T Geronimus; Juan Yang; James S Jackson Journal: J Mens Health Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 0.537
Authors: Ian M Bennett; Jennifer F Culhane; David A Webb; James C Coyne; Vijaya Hogan; Leny Mathew; Irma T Elo Journal: Birth Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.689
Authors: Seth J Schwartz; Jennifer B Unger; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Byron L Zamboanga; Elma I Lorenzo-Blanco; Sabrina E Des Rosiers; Andrea J Romero; Miguel Ángel Cano; Melinda A Gonzales-Backen; David Córdova; Brandy M Piña-Watson; Shi Huang; Juan A Villamar; Daniel W Soto; Monica Pattarroyo; José Szapocznik Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Sue Crengle; Elizabeth Robinson; Shanthi Ameratunga; Terryann Clark; Deborah Raphael Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Delvon T Mattingly; Andrea R Titus; Jana L Hirschtick; Nancy L Fleischer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-23 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Jennifer L Pearson; Andrew Waa; Kamran Siddiqi; Richard Edwards; Patricia Nez Henderson; Monica Webb Hooper Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 4.244