Literature DB >> 29338480

The role of screening mammography in the era of modern breast cancer treatment.

A B Miller1.   

Abstract

The evidence is reviewed on the efficacy and effectiveness of mammography screening derived from randomized screening trials and from the surveillance of populations where mammography screening for breast cancer has been introduced. Nearly all the trials were performed in the era before modern adjuvant therapy for breast cancer was introduced, apart from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study and the UK Age trial. The former found no benefit from annual mammography screening for 5 years in women age 40-59 years, the latter, a non-significant benefit from screening women by annual mammography for 7 years from ages 39 to 41 years. The evidence from population-based surveillance is mixed, most such studies having failed to consider the benefit gained from improved therapy. It is concluded that we have reached the point of negligible benefit from mammography screening for breast cancer in women at average risk, and that we should concentrate on early diagnosis of breast cancer and the application of modern therapy according to clearly defined sub-types of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; mammography; screening; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29338480     DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2017.1392503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Climacteric        ISSN: 1369-7137            Impact factor:   3.005


  4 in total

1.  Assessment of Breast Cancer Mortality Trends Associated With Mammographic Screening and Adjuvant Therapy From 1986 to 2013 in the State of Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Robert Burton; Christopher Stevenson
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-06-01

Review 2.  Why the Gold Standard Approach by Mammography Demands Extension by Multiomics? Application of Liquid Biopsy miRNA Profiles to Breast Cancer Disease Management.

Authors:  Pavol Zubor; Peter Kubatka; Karol Kajo; Zuzana Dankova; Hubert Polacek; Tibor Bielik; Erik Kudela; Marek Samec; Alena Liskova; Dominika Vlcakova; Tatiana Kulkovska; Igor Stastny; Veronika Holubekova; Jan Bujnak; Zuzana Laucekova; Dietrich Büsselberg; Mariusz Adamek; Walther Kuhn; Jan Danko; Olga Golubnitschaja
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  A meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wanqing Xiang; Haiying Rao; Liyu Zhou
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  A Nomogram Based on Radiomics with Mammography Texture Analysis for the Prognostic Prediction in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Xian Jiang; Xiuhe Zou; Jing Sun; Aiping Zheng; Chao Su
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.161

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.