OBJECTIVE: To determine biomechanical effects of knee cartilage defect perimeter morphology based on cartilage strain and opposing subchondral bone contact. DESIGN: Articular cartilage defects were created in 5 bovine femoral condyles: group 1, 45° inner bevel with 8-mm rim; group 2, vertical with 8-mm rim; and group 3, 45° outer bevel with 8-mm base. Samples were placed into a custom-machined micro-computed tomography tube and subjected to 800 N of axial loading. DICOM data were used to calculate cartilage thickness 4 and 6 mm from the center, distance between tibial cartilage surface and femoral subchondral bone, and contact width between tibial cartilage and subchondral bone. Strain 4 mm from the center and both absolute and change in distance (mm) to subchondral bone were compared between groups 1 and 2 using paired t tests. Strain at 6 mm and distance changed, loaded distance, and contact width (mm) were compared between groups using the Friedman test with post hoc analysis using Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: No significant differences in rim strain were noted between groups 1 and 2 at 4 mm ( P = 0.10) and between groups 1, 2, and 3 at 6 mm ( P = 0.247) from the defect center. The loaded distance was significantly different between groups 1 and 3 ( P = 0.013). No significant change in distance to the subchondral bone was found between groups ( P = 0.156). The difference in subchondral bone contact area approached but did not reach significance ( P = 0.074). CONCLUSION: When debriding focal articular cartilage defects, establishment of an inner bevel decreases tissue deformation and contact with opposing subchondral bone.
OBJECTIVE: To determine biomechanical effects of knee cartilage defect perimeter morphology based on cartilage strain and opposing subchondral bone contact. DESIGN:Articular cartilage defects were created in 5 bovine femoral condyles: group 1, 45° inner bevel with 8-mm rim; group 2, vertical with 8-mm rim; and group 3, 45° outer bevel with 8-mm base. Samples were placed into a custom-machined micro-computed tomography tube and subjected to 800 N of axial loading. DICOM data were used to calculate cartilage thickness 4 and 6 mm from the center, distance between tibial cartilage surface and femoral subchondral bone, and contact width between tibial cartilage and subchondral bone. Strain 4 mm from the center and both absolute and change in distance (mm) to subchondral bone were compared between groups 1 and 2 using paired t tests. Strain at 6 mm and distance changed, loaded distance, and contact width (mm) were compared between groups using the Friedman test with post hoc analysis using Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: No significant differences in rim strain were noted between groups 1 and 2 at 4 mm ( P = 0.10) and between groups 1, 2, and 3 at 6 mm ( P = 0.247) from the defect center. The loaded distance was significantly different between groups 1 and 3 ( P = 0.013). No significant change in distance to the subchondral bone was found between groups ( P = 0.156). The difference in subchondral bone contact area approached but did not reach significance ( P = 0.074). CONCLUSION: When debriding focal articular cartilage defects, establishment of an inner bevel decreases tissue deformation and contact with opposing subchondral bone.
Authors: John Theodoropoulos; Tim Dwyer; Daniel Whelan; Paul Marks; Mark Hurtig; Pankaj Sharma Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-02-24 Impact factor: 4.342