| Literature DB >> 29337995 |
Choolwe Jacobs1,2,3, Charles Michelo2,3, Mumbi Chola3, Nicholas Oliphant4, Hikabasa Halwiindi5, Sitali Maswenyeho4, Kumar Sridutt Baboo5, Mosa Moshabela1,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A community-based intervention comprising both men and women, known as Safe Motherhood Action Groups (SMAGs), was implemented in four of Zambia's poorest and most remote districts to improve coverage of selected maternal and neonatal health interventions. This paper reports on outcomes in the coverage of maternal and neonatal care interventions, including antenatal care (ANC), skilled birth attendance (SBA) and postnatal care (PNC) in the study areas.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29337995 PMCID: PMC5770027 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of mothers at Baseline, Midline and Endline surveys for the intervention.
| Variable | Baseline | Midline | Endline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 551) | (n = 550) | (n = 551) | ||
| %(95% CI) | %(95% CI) | %(95% CI) | ||
| 15–24 | 40 (36–46) | 41 (36–45) | 43 (38–47) | 0.517 |
| 25 and above | 60 (56–64) | 59 (55–63) | 57 (52–61) | |
| Not married | 35 (32–38) | 11 (9–14) | 13 (10–16) | 0.000 |
| Married | 65 (62–68) | 89 (86–91) | 87 (84–90) | |
| No | 20 (16–23) | 22 (18–25) | 17(13–19) | 0.117 |
| Yes | 80 (77–84) | 78 (74–81) | 83 (81–87) | |
| Never been to school | 21(17–24) | 25 (21–29) | 20 (17–24) | |
| Incomplete primary | 53 (48–57) | 42 (38–46) | 42 (38–47) | |
| Complete primary | 16 (13–19) | 14(12–18) | 15 (12–18) | |
| Post Primary | 10 (8–13) | 19 (16–22) | 21 (18–25) | 0.000 |
| Cannot read at all | 63 (58–68) | 63 (58–67) | 59 (55–63) | |
| Can read | 37 (33–41) | 37 (33–41) | 41 (37–45) | 0.244 |
| No | 16 (13–19) | 10 (7–12) | ||
| Yes | 84 (81–87) | 90 (87–93) | 0.000 | |
| No | 49 (37–47) | 31 (27–35) | ||
| Yes | 51 (53 - .62) | 69 (64–73) | 0.000 | |
| 53 (48–58) | 30 (25–36) | |||
| Yes | 47 (43–51) | 70 (66–74) | 0.000 | |
| Within 5 Km | 47 (43–52) | 48 (43–52) | ||
| Beyond 5 km | 53 (48–57) | 52 (48–56) | 0.975 | |
* Post primary means attempted and completed secondary
## Variable not measured at baseline
**Can read included those that could read part of the sentence; F test accounting for complex sampling design
Fig 1Trends and differentials in the coverage for ANC, SBA and PNC indicators over a three year period.
Logistic regression results of changes in the core maternal health care outcome indicators in four selected remote districts of Zambia after the community-based intervention (2012–2015).
| Indicator | Coverage%(n/N | P value for trend | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 64% (356) | 1 | 0.416 |
| Midline | 69% (381) | 1.20 (0.92–1.58) | |
| Endline | 66% (367) | 1.06 (0.81–1.37) | |
| Baseline | 29% (165) | 1 | <0.001 |
| Midline | 40% (220) | 1.44 (1.11–1.87) | |
| Endline | 42% (233) | 1.63 (1.38–1.99) | |
| Baseline | 65% (360) | 1 | 0.973 |
| Midline | 54% (297 | 0.60 (0.48–0.80) | |
| Endline | 66% (362) | 0.98 (0.75–1.21) | |
| Baseline | 37% (209) | 1 | <0.001 |
| Midline | 43% (234) | 1.25 (0.97–1.62) | |
| Endline | 49% (270) | 1.72 (1.35–2.10) | |
| Baseline | 28% (154) | 1 | <0.001 |
| Midline | 37% (206) | 1.61 (1.26 | |
| Endline | 45% (245) | 2.13 (1.62 | |
| Baseline | <0.001 | ||
| Midline | 15% (72) | 1 | |
| Endline | 22% (99) | 1.58 (1.14–2.10) | |
Response rate was 100%
Community based interventions were targeted at training SMAGs who included CHW and TBAs on maternal health skills
*The total study participants was 551 at baseline, 550 at midline and 551 at endline
**Adjusted for woman’s age, marital status, ever attended school, women’s literacy, and distance to the facility and level of education
# Baseline data for SMAGs was not collected as these were not yet trained
Results of the logistic regression analysis of the factors related to the endline outcome of use of postnatal care by a CHW or SMAG provider over a three year period.
| Variables | Proportions N = 551 | ANC at least 4 times | Skilled Birth Attendance | postnatal care | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) | P-value | Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) | P-value | Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) | P-value | ||
| Cannot read at all | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Can read | 1.40 (0.96–2.03) | 0.081 | 1.44 (1.14–1.99) | 0.028 | 1.59 (1.17–2.66) | 0.030 | |
| Within 5 Km | 48 (262) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Beyond 5 km | 52 (289) | 0.58 (0.45–0.75) | 0.000 | 0.62 (0.47–0.81) | 0.000 | 1.03 (0 .79–1.35) | 0.126 |
| No | 15 (84) | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Yes | 85 (465) | 1.72 (1.13–2.61) | 0.012 | 2.04 (0.95–4.37) | 0.068 | ||
| No | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Yes | 1.20 (0.93–1.56) | 0.160 | 1.29 (0.96–1.72) | 0.096 | 1.86 (1.26–2.73) | 0.002 | |
| No | 31 (158) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Yes | 69 (349) | 1.70 (0.97–2.99) | 0.065 | 1.49 (1.10–2.00) | 0.009 | 1.76 (1.20–2.19) | 0.004 |
| No | 33 (181) | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Yes | 67 (366) | 4.01 (2.88–5.72) | 0.000 | 2.11 (1.49–3.68) | 0.008 | ||
| No | 50 (276) | 1 | |||||
| Yes | 50 (273) | 2.41 (1.82–3.15) | <0.001 | ||||
# Predictor variable not included in the model for the individual outcome variable
*Women that could read the whole sentence or part of the sentence;
**Coverage at endline