Literature DB >> 29337769

Morbidity Following Coloanal Anastomosis: A Comparison of Colonic J-Pouch vs Straight Anastomosis.

Shaun Brown1, David A Margolin, Laura K Altom, Heather Green, David E Beck, Brian R Kann, Charles B Whitlow, Herschel David Vargas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low rectal tumors are often treated with sphincter-preserving resection followed by coloanal anastomosis.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term complications following straight coloanal anastomosis vs colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis.
DESIGN: Patients were identified who underwent proctectomy for rectal neoplasia followed by coloanal anastomosis in the 2008 to 2013 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Demographic characteristics and 30-day postoperative complications were compared between groups. SETTINGS: A national sample was extracted from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database. PATIENTS: Inpatients following proctectomy and coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic characteristics and 30-day postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: One thousand three hundred seventy patients were included, 624 in the straight anastomosis group and 746 in the colonic J-pouch group. Preoperative characteristics were similar between groups, with the exception of preoperative radiation therapy (straight anastomosis 35% vs colonic J-pouch 48%, p = 0.0004). Univariate analysis demonstrated that deep surgical site infection (3.7% vs 1.4%, p = 0.01), septic shock (2.25% vs 0.8%, p = 0.04), and return to the operating room (8.8% vs 5.0%, p = 0.0006) were more frequent in the straight anastomosis group vs the colonic J-pouch group. Major complications were also higher (23% vs 14%, p = 0.0001) and length of stay was longer in the straight anastomosis group vs the colonic J-pouch group (8.9 days vs 8.1 days, p = 0.02). After adjusting for covariates, major complications were less following colonic J-pouch vs straight anastomosis (OR, 0.57; CI, 0.38-0.84; p = 0.005). Subgroup analysis of patients who received preoperative radiation therapy demonstrated no difference in major complications between groups. LIMITATIONS: This study had those limitations inherent to a retrospective study using an inpatient database.
CONCLUSION: Postoperative complications were less following colonic J-pouch anastomosis vs straight anastomosis. Patients who received preoperative radiation had similar rates of complications, regardless of the reconstructive technique used following low anterior resection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A468.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29337769     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  5 in total

1.  Delayed Colo-anal Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer: Pelvic Morbidity, Functional Results and Oncological Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Portale; George Octavian Popesc; Matteo Parotto; Francesco Cavallin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Comparison of the colonic J-pouch versus straight (end-to-end) anastomosis following low anterior resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shafquat Zaman; Ali Yasen Y Mohamedahmed; Adewale Adeoba Ayeni; Elizabeth Peterknecht; Sadiq Mawji; Mohamed Albendary; Rajnish Mankotia; Akinfemi Akingboye
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Short stump and high anastomosis pull-through (SHiP) procedure for delayed coloanal anastomosis with no protective stoma for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Bianco; Paola Incollingo; Armando Falato; Silvia De Franciscis; Andrea Belli; Fabio Carbone; Gaetano Gallo; Mario Fusco; Giovanni Maria Romano
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-03-16

Review 4.  Safety and efficacy of side-to-end anastomosis versus colonic J-pouch anastomosis in sphincter-preserving resections: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Sen Hou; Quan Wang; Shidong Zhao; Fan Liu; Peng Guo; Yingjiang Ye
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Safety of coloanal/ileoanal anastomosis during cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis: results of 20 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Ozgul Duzgun; Murat Kalin
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 1.671

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.