Literature DB >> 29337717

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Traditional Open Versus Minimally Invasive Techniques.

Michael J Lee1, James Mok, Pranay Patel.   

Abstract

Recently, minimally invasive spine arthrodesis has gained popularity among spine surgeons. Minimally invasive techniques have advantages and disadvantages compared with traditional open techniques. Comparisons between short-term outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion and open transforaminal interbody fusion in terms of estimated blood loss, postoperative pain, and hospital length of stay have been well documented and generally favor the minimally invasive technique. However, the advantages of minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion must be evaluated in the context of long-term results, such as patient-reported outcomes and the success of arthrodesis. Because the literature is equivocal in identifying the superior technique for successful long-term outcomes, more study is needed. Patient safety, the risk of complications, and the cost of these techniques also must be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29337717     DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  10 in total

1.  Differences in the interbody bone graft area and fusion rate between minimally invasive and traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective short-term image analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Yao; Hsi-Hsien Lin; Po-Hsin Chou; Shih-Tien Wang; Ming-Chau Chang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  An Update on Postoperative Opioid Use and Alternative Pain Control Following Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Berardino; Austin H Carroll; Alicia Kaneb; Matthew D Civilette; William F Sherman; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2021-06-22

3.  Lateral decubitus single position anterior-posterior (AP) fusion shows equivalent results to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kimberly Ashayeri; J Alex Thomas; Brett Braly; Nicholas O'Malley; Carlos Leon; Ivan Cheng; Brian Kwon; Mark Medley; Leon Eisen; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Aaron J Buckland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  Clinical Application of CT Navigation in treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with Minimally Invasive Surgery - Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Ru-de Sui; Chun-Guo Wang; Jin-Cai Zhang; Hai-Tao Wang
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Interbody Lumbar Fusion.

Authors:  Chi Heon Kim; Kirk Easley; Jun-Seok Lee; Jae-Young Hong; Michael Virk; Patrick C Hsieh; Sangwook T Yoon
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

6.  Application of Anchoring Technique in Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Neurologically Intact Kümmell's Disease.

Authors:  Rongqing Qin; Xing Zhang; Hongpeng Liu; Bing Zhou; Pin Zhou; Chuanliang Hu
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 7.  Is minimally invasive superior than open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aimin Li; Xiang Li; Yang Zhong
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Minimally invasive versus traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Rongqing Qin; Tong Wu; Hongpeng Liu; Bing Zhou; Pin Zhou; Xing Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comparison of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) for Treatment of Lumbar Degeneration Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hai-Feng Zhu; Xiang-Qian Fang; Feng-Dong Zhao; Jian-Feng Zhang; Xing Zhao; Zhi-Jun Hu; Shun-Wu Fan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Techniques, Pearls and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Young-Hoon Kim; Kee-Yong Ha; Kee-Won Rhyu; Hyung-Youl Park; Chang-Hee Cho; Hun-Chul Kim; Hyo-Jin Lee; Sang-Il Kim
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2020-10-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.