INTRODUCTION: Between 9 and 44% of women experience giving birth as traumatic, and 3% of women develop a post-traumatic stress disorder following childbirth. Knowledge on risk factors is abundant, but studies on treatment are limited. This study aimed to present an overview of means to prevent traumatic birth experiences and childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Major databases [Cochrane; Embase; PsycINFO; PubMed (Medline)] were searched using combinations of the key words and their synonyms. RESULTS: After screening titles and abstracts and reading 135 full-text articles, 13 studies were included. All evaluated secondary prevention, and none primary prevention. Interventions included debriefing, structured psychological interventions, expressive writing interventions, encouraging skin-to-skin contact with healthy newborns immediately postpartum and holding or seeing the newborn after stillbirth. The large heterogeneity of study characteristics precluded pooling of data. The writing interventions to express feelings appeared to be effective in prevention. A psychological intervention including elements of exposure and psycho-education seemed to lead to fewer post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in women who delivered via emergency cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS: No research has been done on primary prevention of traumatic childbirth. Research on secondary prevention of traumatic childbirth and post-traumatic stress disorder following delivery provides insufficient evidence that the described interventions are effective in unselected groups of women. In certain subgroups, results are inhomogeneous.
INTRODUCTION: Between 9 and 44% of women experience giving birth as traumatic, and 3% of women develop a post-traumatic stress disorder following childbirth. Knowledge on risk factors is abundant, but studies on treatment are limited. This study aimed to present an overview of means to prevent traumatic birth experiences and childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Major databases [Cochrane; Embase; PsycINFO; PubMed (Medline)] were searched using combinations of the key words and their synonyms. RESULTS: After screening titles and abstracts and reading 135 full-text articles, 13 studies were included. All evaluated secondary prevention, and none primary prevention. Interventions included debriefing, structured psychological interventions, expressive writing interventions, encouraging skin-to-skin contact with healthy newborns immediately postpartum and holding or seeing the newborn after stillbirth. The large heterogeneity of study characteristics precluded pooling of data. The writing interventions to express feelings appeared to be effective in prevention. A psychological intervention including elements of exposure and psycho-education seemed to lead to fewer post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in women who delivered via emergency cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS: No research has been done on primary prevention of traumatic childbirth. Research on secondary prevention of traumatic childbirth and post-traumatic stress disorder following delivery provides insufficient evidence that the described interventions are effective in unselected groups of women. In certain subgroups, results are inhomogeneous.
Authors: David G Thoele; Cemile Gunalp; Danielle Baran; Jamie Harris; Douglas Moss; Ramona Donovan; Yi Li; Marjorie A Getz Journal: Perm J Date: 2019-11-22
Authors: Claire Hughes; Sarah Foley; Rory T Devine; Andrew Ribner; Lara Kyriakou; Lucy Boddington; Emily A Holmes Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2019-07-06 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: A B Witteveen; C A I Stramrood; J Henrichs; J C Flanagan; M G van Pampus; M Olff Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Mark A van Heumen; Martine H Hollander; Maria G van Pampus; Jeroen van Dillen; Claire A I Stramrood Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Charlotte Lindblad Wollmann; Can Liu; Sissel Saltvedt; Charlotte Elvander; Mia Ahlberg; Olof Stephansson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 3.240