Literature DB >> 29336218

The different audiences of science communication: A segmentation analysis of the Swiss population's perceptions of science and their information and media use patterns.

Mike S Schäfer1, Tobias Füchslin1,1, Julia Metag2,1, Silje Kristiansen3,1, Adrian Rauchfleisch1.   

Abstract

Few studies have assessed whether populations can be divided into segments with different perceptions of science. We provide such an analysis and assess whether these segments exhibit specific patterns of media and information use. Based on representative survey data from Switzerland, we use latent class analysis to reconstruct four segments: the "Sciencephiles," with strong interest for science, extensive knowledge, and a pronounced belief in its potential, who use a variety of sources intensively; the "Critically Interested," also with strong interest and support for science but with less trust in it, who use similar sources but are more cautious toward them; the "Passive Supporters" with moderate levels of interest, trust, and knowledge and tempered perceptions of science, who use fewer sources; and the "Disengaged," who are not interested in science, do not know much about it, harbor critical views toward it, and encounter it-if at all-mostly through television.

Keywords:  Switzerland; science attitudes and perceptions; science communication; survey

Year:  2018        PMID: 29336218     DOI: 10.1177/0963662517752886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Underst Sci        ISSN: 0963-6625


  3 in total

1.  Science-related populism declining during the COVID-19 pandemic: A panel survey of the Swiss population before and after the Coronavirus outbreak.

Authors:  Niels G Mede; Mike S Schäfer
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

2.  Who supports science-related populism? A nationally representative survey on the prevalence and explanatory factors of populist attitudes toward science in Switzerland.

Authors:  Niels G Mede; Mike S Schäfer; Julia Metag; Kira Klinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Science-related populism: Conceptualizing populist demands toward science.

Authors:  Niels G Mede; Mike S Schäfer
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2020-06-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.