Literature DB >> 29336058

Programming settings and recharge interval in a prospective study of a rechargeable sacral neuromodulation system for the treatment of overactive bladder.

Bertil Blok1, Philip Van Kerrebroeck2, Stefan de Wachter3, Alain Ruffion4, Frank Van der Aa5, Ranjana Jairam2, Marie Perrouin-Verbe6, Sohier Elneil7.   

Abstract

AIMS: The RELAX-OAB study is designed to confirm the safety, efficacy, and technical performance of the Axonics r-SNM System, a miniaturized, rechargeable SNM system approved in Europe and Canada for the treatment of bladder and bowel dysfunction. The purpose of this article is to describe study subjects' ability to charge the rechargeable neurostimulator and to document their neurostimulator program settings and recharge interval over time.
METHODS: Fifty-one OAB patients were implanted in a single-stage procedure. These results represent the 3-month charging experience for 48 subjects who completed the 3-month follow-up. Recharge intervals were estimated using therapy stimulation settings and subject experience was evaluated using questionnaires.
RESULTS: Forty-seven of forty-eight (98%) subjects were able to successfully charge their device prior to follow-up within 1-month post-implant. At 3-month post-implant, 98% of subjects were able to charge prior to their follow-up visit. Average stimulation amplitude across all subjects was 1.8 mA (±1.1 mA). A total of 69% of subjects had ≥14-day recharge intervals (time between charging) and 98% of subjects had ≥7-day recharge interval. No charging related adverse events occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Study subjects were able to charge the Axonics r-SNM System and stimulation settings provided 2 weeks of therapy between recharging for most subjects. Subject satisfaction indicates that subjects are satisfied with rechargeable SNM therapy.
© 2018 The Authors. Neurourology and Urodynamics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  overactive bladder; patient experience; recharge interval; rechargeable; sacral neuromodulation; stimulation settings

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29336058     DOI: 10.1002/nau.23476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  5 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation in the treatment of bladder dysfunction: technology update.

Authors:  R L Coolen; J Groen; Bfm Blok
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2019-09-11

2.  Acute effect of sacral neuromodulation for treatment of detrusor overactivity on urodynamic parameters.

Authors:  Ilse M Groenendijk; Jan Groen; Jeroen R Scheepe; Bertil F M Blok
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 3.  Axonics Sacral Neuromodulation System for Treating Refractory Overactive Bladder: A NICE Medical Technologies Guidance.

Authors:  Ruth Louise Poole; Megan Dale; Helen Morgan; Tosin Oladapo; Rebecca Brookfield; Rhys Morris
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence-Recommendations for Day-to-Day Practice.

Authors:  Paul A Lehur; Michael Sørensen; Thomas C Dudding; Charles H Knowles; Stefan de Wachter; Stefan Engelberg; Klaus E Matzel
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-03-09

Review 5.  Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Thomas C Dudding; Paul A Lehur; Michael Sørensen; Stefan Engelberg; Maria Paola Bertapelle; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Karel Everaert; Philip Van Kerrebroeck; Charles H Knowles; Lilli Lundby; Klaus E Matzel; Arantxa Muñoz-Duyos; Mona B Rydningen; Stefan de Wachter
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-07-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.