| Literature DB >> 29335517 |
Yaguang Peng1, Hongliang Huang2,3, Yuxi Zhang1, Chufan Kang1, Shuangming Chen4, Li Song4, Dahuan Liu1, Chongli Zhong5,6,7.
Abstract
Current technologies for removing heavy metal ions are typicallyEntities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29335517 PMCID: PMC5768720 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02600-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Schematic illustration of the BS-HMT concept. a The ordered HCOOH in MOF-808 can be substituted by EDTA to form b MOF-808 with ordered EDTA, which can be used as c a BS-HMT for metal ion capture
Fig. 2Characterization and illustration of MOF-808 and MOF-808-EDTA. a, b Schematic illustration of the structures of the two MOFs. c PXRD patterns. d N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms. e Pore size distributions. f, g SEM images (Scale bar, 500 nm). h 1H NMR spectra of (A) alkaline-digested MOF-808-EDTA, (B) alkaline-digested MOF-808, (C) EDTA-2Na, and (D) H3BTC in KOH/D2O solution
Fig. 3Removal efficiency of heavy metal ion in single-component systems. The removal efficiency of hard Lewis metal ions, soft Lewis metal ions, and borderline Lewis metal ions for a–c MOF-808-EDTA, d–f MOF-808-OX, and g–i MOF-808-TGA
Fig. 4Characterization of MOF-808-EDTA before and after metal ion loading. a–c Wide-scan XPS spectra and d–f FT-IR spectra of MOF-808-EDTA before and after La3+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ loading
Fig. 5Capture performance of MOF-808-EDTA in multi-component systems. a Simultaneous removal efficiency for 19 metal ions in batch adsorption. b Breakthrough curves in the fixed bed adsorption
Fig. 6Dispersity of metal ions in MOF-808-EDTA. STEM-HAADF images (scale bar, 100 nm) and the corresponding elemental maps for a MOF-808-EDTA, b–d single-metal systems (MOF-808-EDTA with loaded La3+, Hg2+, and Pb2+, respectively), e binary system (MOF-808-EDTA with loaded Co2+ and Ni2+), and f ternary system (MOF-808-EDTA with loaded Cu2+, Rh3+and Ru3+)