| Literature DB >> 29335252 |
Nikolina Zdraveska1, Maja Zdravkovska2, Violeta Anastasovska1, Elena Sukarova-Angelovska1, Mirjana Kocova3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic re-evaluation is important for all patients with congenital hypothyroidism (CH) for determining the etiology and identifying transient CH cases. Our study is a first thyroxine therapy withdrawal study conducted in Macedonian CH patients for a diagnostic re-evaluation. We aimed to evaluate the etiology of CH, the prevalence of transient CH and identify predictive factors for distinguishing between permanent (PCH) and transient CH (TCH).Entities:
Keywords: congenital hypothyroidism; etiology; levothyroxine; transient
Year: 2018 PMID: 29335252 PMCID: PMC5801559 DOI: 10.1530/EC-17-0332
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endocr Connect ISSN: 2049-3614 Impact factor: 3.335
Figure 1Flow diagram of the follow-up study.
Comparison of the clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with congenital hypothyroidism.
| Total ( | Permanent CH ( | Transient CH ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex ( | |||
| Female | 29 | 17 | 0.091a |
| Male | 13 | 17 | |
| Birth weight (kg) | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 3.1 ± 0.6 | 0.303 |
| Gestational age (week) | 39.3 ± 1.2 | 38.9 ± 1.6 | 0.121 |
| Age of treatment initiation (day) | 11.3 ± 4.2 | 13.8 ± 3.4 | 0.076 |
| Thyroid tests at diagnosis | |||
| TSH (µIU/L) | 81.9 ± 56.8 | 22.7 ± 10.9 | <0.0001 |
| T4 (µg/dL) | 4.8 ± 3.9 | 6.7 ± 2.4 | 0.0023 |
| Levothyroxine dose (µg/kg) | |||
| Initial | 11.8 ± 2.1 | 9.2 ± 1.5 | 0.002 |
| 1 year | 3.7 ± 0.8 | 2.4 ± 0.7 | <0.0001 |
| 2 years | 3.3 ± 0.7 | 1.9 ± 0.6 ( | <0.0001 |
| 3 years | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 1.7 ± 0.6 ( | <0.0001 |
| At re-evaluation | 2.6 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 0.5 ( | |
aThe sex ratio between groups was calculated using the chi-square test.
Characteristics of patients with permanent congenital hypothyroidism.
| Permanent CH ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etiology | Thyroid dysgenesis ( | Thyroid dyshormonogenesis ( | |||
| Athyreosis ( | Ectopy ( | Hypoplasia ( | |||
| Thyroid function tests | |||||
| At time of diagnosis | |||||
| TSH (µIU/L) | 122.5 ± 51.2 | 67.1 ± 40.7 | 31.3 ± 17.3 | 30.9 ± 18.7 | <0.05* |
| T4 (µg/dL) | 2.9 ± 2.7 | 6.4 ± 4.2 | 7.3 ± 4.6 | 6.8 ± 3.1 | <0.05* |
| After treatment discontinuation | |||||
| TSH (µIU/L) | 72.2 ± 10.6 | 58.8 ± 27.1 | 35.9 ± 21.8 | 27.3 ± 10.6 | <0.05* |
| T4 (µg/dL) | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 3.6 ± 2.8 | 6.8 ± 3.5 | 3.2 ± 3.0 | <0.05* |
| At time of diagnosis | 12.2 ± 2.2 | 11.5 ± 1.1 | 10.9 ± 2.8 | 10.3 ± 2.0 | 0.256 |
| At time of treatment discontinuation | 2.6 ± 0.5 | 2.9 ± 0.8 | 2.3 ± 0.9 | 2.37 ± 0.4 | 0.237 |
*The P value corresponding to the F statistic of one-way ANOVA for the initial TSH values and TSH at re-evaluation is lower than 0.05 suggesting for significant difference between the CH etiology groups.
Tukey HDS (‘Honestly Significant Difference’) post hoc test results indicating which groups significantly differ from others providing 95% confidence interval.
| At diagnosis | After treatment discontinuation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tukey HSD Q statistic | Tukey HSD Q statistic | |||
| TSH value | ||||
| Athyreosis vs ectopy | 4.9351 | 0.0066** | 2.1721 | 0.4272 |
| Athyreosis vs hypoplasia | 5.7550 | 0.0013** | 6.8050 | 0.0010** |
| Athyreosis vs dyshormonogenesis | 5.9677 | 0.0010** | 8.4170 | 0.0010** |
| Ectopy vs hypoplasia | 2.0516 | 0.4923 | 4.7093 | 0.0094** |
| Ectopy vs dyshormonogenesis | 2.2164 | 0.4106 | 6.1942 | 0.0010** |
| Hypoplasia vs dyshormonogenesis | 0.1690 | 0.8999 | 1.2859 | 0.7772 |
| T4 value | ||||
| Athyreosis vs ectopy | 3.995 | 0.035** | 4.5641 | 0.0126** |
| Athyreosis vs hypoplasia | 4.378 | 0.018** | 8.0208 | 0.0010** |
| Athyreosis vs dyshormonogenesis | 3.047 | 0.153 | 2.9966 | 0.1643 |
| Ectopy vs hypoplasia | 1.058 | 0.866 | 4.1226 | 0.0282** |
| Ectopy vs dyshormonogenesis | 0.035 | 0.899 | 0.5289 | 0.8999 |
| Hypoplasia vs dyshormonogenesis | 0.923 | 0.899 | 4.0283 | 0.0332** |
**P< 0.05.
Figure 2ROC curves shows both the initial TSH values and the levothyroxine dose at 3 years of age were predictive factors for discrimination between transient and permanent congenital hypothyroidism.
Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with transitory congenital hypothyroidism.
| Predictors | Coefficient | Sth. error | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3069 | |||||
| Initial TSH value | −0.004274 | 0.001965 | −0.3691 | −2.175 | 0.0376* |
| Initial T4 value | −0.003676 | 0.01800 | −0.03725 | −0.204 | 0.8396 |
| Initial LT4 dose | −0.04351 | 0.02828 | −0.2705 | −1.539 | 0.1343 |
| LT4 dose at 1-year age | −0.08257 | 0.06334 | −0.2315 | −1.304 | 0.2023 |
| LT4 dose at 2-year age | −0.1185 | 0.06672 | −0.3085 | −1.776 | 0.0858 |
| LT4 dose at 3-year age | −0.2374 | 0.07304 | −0.5104 | −3.251 | 0.0028* |
*P < 0.05.