João R Vale1,2, Tatu Rimpiläinen1, Elina Sievänen3, Kari Rissanen3, Carlos A M Afonso2, Nuno R Candeias1. 1. Laboratory of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Tampere University of Technology , Korkeakoulunkatu 8, 33101 Tampere, Finland. 2. Instituto de Investigação do Medicamento (iMed.ULisboa), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa , Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal. 3. University of Jyvaskyla , Department of Chemistry, Nanoscience Center, P.O. Box 35, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland.
Abstract
The autoxidative condensation of 2-aryl-2-lithio-1,3-dithianes is here reported. Treatment of 2-aryl-1,3-dithianes with n-BuLi in the absence of any electrophile leads to condensation of three molecules of 1,3-dithianes and formation of highly functionalized α-thioether ketones orthothioesters in 51-89% yields upon air exposure. The method was further expanded to benzaldehyde dithioacetals, affording corresponding orthothioesters and α-thioether ketones in 48-97% yields. The experimental results combined with density functional theory studies support a mechanism triggered by the autoxidation of 2-aryl-2-lithio-1,3-dithianes to yield a highly reactive thioester that undergoes condensation with two other molecules of 2-aryl-2-lithio-1,3-dithiane.
The autoxidative condensation of 2-aryl-2-lithio-1,3-dithianes is here reported. Treatment of 2-aryl-1,3-dithianes with n-BuLi in the absence of any electrophile leads to condensation of three molecules of 1,3-dithianes and formation of highly functionalized α-thioether ketones orthothioesters in 51-89% yields upon air exposure. The method was further expanded to benzaldehyde dithioacetals, affording corresponding orthothioesters and α-thioether ketones in 48-97% yields. The experimental results combined with density functional theory studies support a mechanism triggered by the autoxidation of 2-aryl-2-lithio-1,3-dithianes to yield a highly reactive thioester that undergoes condensation with two other molecules of 2-aryl-2-lithio-1,3-dithiane.
Organolithium compounds
can undergo autoxidation toward formation
of highly unstable organolithium peroxides, which upon fast interaction
with another organolithium leads to the ultimate formation of lithium
alkoxides.[1] Oxidation of RLi with ROOLi
was proven by Müller and Töpel[2] in 1939 and used in several oxidative processes,[3] and the autoxidation of organolithiums further explored
in preparation of alcohols.[4]The
first reports of Corey and Seebach[5] on
the use of lithiated 1,3-dithianes as synthetic equivalents to
acyl anions have rapidly gathered the attention of the synthetic community.
The umpolung strategy rendered by transformation of aldehydes to 2-substituted
1,3-dithianes and subsequent formation of the lithiated acyl anion
equivalent have been explored for preparation of a wide array of products,[6,7] namely in natural product synthesis.[8] Other thioacetals can lead to the formation of similar acyclic lithiated
anions,[9] but it was soon realized that
cyclic 2-lithio-1,3-dithianes were advantageous due to their ease
of preparation and general suitability.[6b] Despite the undisputable importance of 2-lithio-1,3-dithianes in
synthetic chemistry, inconsistent yields and formation of side products
have been reported.[10] Problems derived
from its high reactivity and strong basicity have been overcome either
by transmetalation,[11−13] or using less reactive silyl,[14−16] or tin[10a,17] analogues. The autoxidation of 2-lithio-1,3-dithiane (Scheme ) upon air exposure has been
reported by Wade and co-workers,[18] after
observing formation of 1 and 2 in absence
of an electrophile. The formation of 1 was also later
reported by Argade and co-workers when preparing 2-lithio-1,3-dithiane.[19] The presence of an oxidizing impurity in older
bottles of n-BuLi was advanced as the cause for the
formation of the oxidized products. The same compound was reported
to be formed in 25% yield when preparing 2-lithio-1,3-dithiane in
THF, proposed by the authors to arise from the unlikely reaction of
the desired intermediate with solvent.[20] Presence of dimers derived from single electron transfer processes
have been observed in several other works,[12a,14c,21] especially in the presence of
nitro substituted compounds.[22] The nucleophilic
addition of 2-lithio-1,3-dithianes to acyl chlorides and esters reported
by Kutateladze and co-workers[23] is one
example from the vast array of dithiane umpolung reactivity of carbonyl
compounds (Scheme ). Interestingly, when an aldehyde other than acetaldehyde is used,
the reaction proceeds through addition of a second dithiane molecule
through ring-opening of the first installed dithiane unit.[24]
Scheme 1
Considering the previous reports
on the autoxidation of 2-lithio-1,3-dithianes,
we envisioned that 2-aryl-2-lithio-1,3-dithianes could be oxidized in situ to yield a thioester capable of undergoing a similar
attack by the excess organolithium eventually forming compounds similar
to those described by Kutateladze in a pot economy.[25] Previously reported transformations of the envisioned products
include desulfurizing difluorination of the α-thioether ketone
and dithioketal moieties[26] or trifluoromethylation
of benzylic orthothioesters.[26b,27] Orthothioesters can
be converted to esters, thioesters or orthoesters[28] and α-thioether ketones have also been used in the
oxidative coupling of benzyl ketones.[29]
Results and Discussion
Gratifyingly, when reacting 2-phenyl-2-lithium-1,3-dithiane
with S-benzyl benzothioate, product 5a was obtained
in 89% yield (Table , entry 1). The ability of the thioester group to undergo the same
transformation as benzoyl chloride (entry 2) prompted us to assess
the possibility for in situ formation of the thioester
by oxidation of the lithium dithiane. Hence, the argon atmosphere
of a solution of 2-phenyl-2-lithium-1,3-dithiane from 4a was replaced by oxygen and kept for 5 min to afford the thioorthoester
in 69% yield (entry 3). The simple exposure of the reaction mixture
to air for 30 min allowed formation of thioorthoester 5a in 41% yield (entry 4), which was increased to 68% by decreasing
exposure to air to less than a minute (entry 5), and to 71% by forming
the lithiated dithiane at 0 °C (entry 6). Modification of the
stoichiometric amounts of n-BuLi or other solvents
(entries 7–10) did not improve the reaction success. Although
a fast process at 0 °C, air exposure of the organolithium at
−78 °C led to only traces of product and unreacted dithiane
(entry 11).
Table 1
Optimization of Reaction Conditions
entry
deviation from reaction conditionsa
yield (%)b
1
PhC(O)SBn
(0.65 equiv), no air
89
2
PhC(O)Cl (0.65 equiv), no air
71
3
O2 balloon for 5 min
69
4
30 min air exposure
41
5
rt, 20 min
68
6
0 °C to rt, 20 min
71
7
1.0 equiv n-BuLi, 0 °C to rt, 20 min
66
8
1.6 equiv n-BuLi, 0 °C to rt, 20 min
60
9
Et2O, 0 °C to rt, 20 min
46
10
toluene
39
11
air exposure at –78 °C
traces
n-BuLi (2.5 M in
hexanes, 1.3 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of dithiane 4a (1 mmol) in THF (5 mL) under argon atmosphere at −78
°C. The mixture was left to reach rt after 20 min, and opened
to air 1 min before addition of NH4Cl saturated aqueous
solution.
Isolated yield.
n-BuLi (2.5 M in
hexanes, 1.3 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of dithiane 4a (1 mmol) in THF (5 mL) under argon atmosphere at −78
°C. The mixture was left to reach rt after 20 min, and opened
to air 1 min before addition of NH4Cl saturated aqueous
solution.Isolated yield.Finally, the optimized protocol
retrieved formation of orthothioester 5a in 76% and the
scope of the method was evaluated (Scheme ). Formation of ortholithiation
derived products was not observed even in the presence of directing
metalating groups. The correspondent orthothioesters derived from
electron rich or electron poor aryl dithianes could be obtained in
reasonable yields. Phenyl-1,3-dithianes decorated with halogens at
the para-position were successfully transformed into
the corresponding orthothioesters 5d and 5e, although LDA had to be used for the bromide derivative to avoid
transmetalation with n-BuLi. TBDMS and TBDPSsilyl
protective groups were stable to the reaction conditions, and silyl
ethers 5j and 5k could be obtained in up
to 89% yield. A dithiane derived from 2-formylpyridine resulted in
formation of 5i in 57% yield. Despite several attempts
on the autoxidative addition of nitrophenyl-1,3-dithianes, only alkylated
derivatives or starting materials were obtained. Other electron deficient
dithianes such as pentafluorophenyl or para-trifluoromethylphenyl
derivatives were unstable toward the lithiation conditions tested.
Scheme 2
For reaction conditions see footnote a, Table .
LDA as base.
For reaction conditions see footnote a, Table .LDA as base.Acyclic benzaldehydedithioacetals derived from primary and secondary
thiols undergo the same process to yield α-thioether ketones 7 and orthothioesters 8 (Table ). Dithioacetal 6e derived from tert-butyl mercaptan failed to provide the corresponding
ketone or orthothioesters likely due to steric hindrance as only thioester 9 could be obtained. The use of O2 instead of air
was observed to be detrimental for the reaction yield, as complex
mixtures of products were obtained in such cases.
Table 2
Autooxidative Condensation of Benzaldehyde-Derived
Dithioacetals
For reaction
conditions see footnote a, Table .
Isolated yield.
Observed
in 1H NMR of
the crude mixture but not isolated.
For reaction
conditions see footnote a, Table .Isolated yield.Observed
in 1H NMR of
the crude mixture but not isolated.In order to evaluate the scope of the transformation
concerning
the nature of the 2-substituent of 1,3-dithianes, several 2-alkyl-1,3-dithianes
were submitted to our autoxidative conditions (Scheme ). The autoxidation of 2-lithio-1,3-dithiane
under the reaction conditions resulted in the unsurprising formation
of alcohol 1a as previously reported by Wade and co-workers
(Scheme , eq 1).[18] 2-Alkyl substituted 1,3-dithianes undergo autoxidation
to some extent, however the reaction is halted before orthothioester
formation and 10 are obtained in up to 27% yields (Scheme , eq 2) probably
due to the competitive formation of the lithium enolate of product.
Similar yields of the products were observed when increasing the amount
of n-BuLi. The presence of a bulky t-butyl substituent alters the outcome of the reaction. Dithioester 11, resulting from condensation of two oxidized species was
the only product identified (Scheme , eq 3). The autoxidative addition of 1,3-dithiane
derived from silyl protectedglycoaldehyde yields 10p together with hexyl substituted 1,3-dithiane. The formation of the
later is likely to occur by trapping of the ketene dithiane with n-butyl lithium.[30] Several attempts
to apply this procedure to 2-silyl substituted 1,3-dithianes, such
as 2-TMS-1,3-dithiane 2-TBDPS-1,3-dithiane, resulted in the formation
of complex mixtures of unidentified products.
Scheme 3
For
reaction conditions see footnote a, Table . Isolated yields.
Unreacted
dithiane 4 was isolated as the major species.
2-(n-Hexyl)-1,3-dithiane
was also isolated in 23%.
For
reaction conditions see footnote a, Table . Isolated yields.Unreacted
dithiane 4 was isolated as the major species.2-(n-Hexyl)-1,3-dithiane
was also isolated in 23%.The role of atmospheric
oxygen as the oxidant species in the process
was confirmed by running the autoxidative condensation reaction under 18O2, affording the 18O isotopically
labeled 5a in 72% yield (Scheme , eq 1). Impelled by the previous suggestions
that a SET mechanism could be involved, the exposure to air in the
presence of TEMPO was performed (Scheme , eq 2). Trapped intermediates were not identified
and only compound 2 was isolated, already known to derive
from SET.[12a,14c,21] Notably, formation of compound 5a was not observed,
which might indicate the SET process to be a pitfall prior to the
organolithium autoxidation. The presence of 12 as intermediate
in the reaction was supported by its reaction with lithium dithiane
derived from 4a (Scheme , eq 3).
Scheme 4
In order to get some insight
on the reaction mechanism, the several
putative processes involved in the transformation were studied by
DFT calculations.[31] The spontaneous autoxidation
of the organolithium compound was verified through optimization of
relevant intervenient species (Scheme ). The process seems highly favorable, as the lithium
alkoxide formation is balanced by the release of 25.4 kcal/mol upon
reaction of lithium dithiane with triplet oxygen[3a] followed by release of 88.9 kcal/mol upon reaction of the
lithium peroxide with lithium dithiane to form the corresponding lithium
alkoxide.
Scheme 5
According to our calculations, formation of
thioester B from lithium alkoxide A requires
only 2.7 kcal/mol
(Figure ). The thiolate
charge in thioester B is highly stabilized by lithium
and becomes more stabilized upon interaction with a lithium dithiane
molecule (C). The presence of lithium increases the C=O
polarization of the thioester assisting the nucleophilic attack of
a lithium dithiane molecule, and requires 11.2 kcal/mol. The transition
state TS resembles an early
one, as suggested by the rather long forming C–C bond and small
Figure 1
Free energy
profile (PBE0) for deterioration of lithium alkoxide
and reaction with 2-phenyl-2-lithio-1,3-dithiane, and mechanistic
representation. Optimized structures of minima and transition states
are presented with bond distances and Wiberg indexes (in italics)
for the more relevant bonds. Free energies values are presented in
kcal/mol, referring to the initial intermediate A.
Free energy
profile (PBE0) for deterioration of lithium alkoxide
and reaction with 2-phenyl-2-lithio-1,3-dithiane, and mechanistic
representation. Optimized structures of minima and transition states
are presented with bond distances and Wiberg indexes (in italics)
for the more relevant bonds. Free energies values are presented in
kcal/mol, referring to the initial intermediate A.Wiberg index[32] (d =
2.84 Å and WI = 0.13), which becomes considerably shorter in
the tetrahedral intermediate D (d =
1.61 Å and WI = 0.90). The collapse of intermediate D to the more stable pair of ketone and lithium thiolate (E) requires only 5.0 kcal/mol to overcome the transition state TS energy barrier. Interaction of
the lithium cations with sulfur atoms is visible in calculated TS, although such stabilization
is likely to take place by the solvent molecules. The pair of products
represented in E is highly stabilized by interaction
of lithium cations with both sulfur atoms of the thiolate and the
carbonyl oxygen.Condensation of the ketone 12 in E with
another lithium dithiane molecule was considered, as observed experimentally
(Scheme , eq 3), by
taking the nucleophilic attack of the organolithium to a sulfur atom
of the α-disubstituted ketone (Figure ).[24] The calculated
transition state for this reaction TS is characterized by distension of the C–S bond of the
ketone (2.11 Å in TS and
1.85 Å in F) and formation of a new C–S bond
(2.49 Å and WI = 0.29) with the lithium dithiane molecule, demanding
for 11.2 kcal/mol. Weakening of the carbon–oxygen bond from F to G is visible by its length (1.23 Å
in F and 1.29 Å in G) and weaker Wiberg
index in the lithium enolate product G (WI = 1.65 in F and 1.31 in G), accompanied by strengthening
of the C–C bond (1.55 Å; WI = 0.95 in F and
1.40 Å; WI = 1.47 in G). Although we cannot rule
out a radical mechanism based on our calculations (as suggested by
Kutateladze[23] and considered in Supporting Information), the low energy barrier
determined for the ionic nucleophilic attack might indicate this as
the main route for formation of the orthothioester product.
Figure 2
Free energy
profile (PBE0) for nucleophilic condensation of α-disubstituted
ketone with 2-phenyl-2-lithio-1,3-dithiane and mechanistic representation.
Optimized structures of minima and transition states are presented
with bond distances and Wiberg indexes (in italics) for the more relevant
bonds. Free energies values are presented in kcal/mol, referring to
the initial intermediate A from Figure .
Free energy
profile (PBE0) for nucleophilic condensation of α-disubstituted
ketone with 2-phenyl-2-lithio-1,3-dithiane and mechanistic representation.
Optimized structures of minima and transition states are presented
with bond distances and Wiberg indexes (in italics) for the more relevant
bonds. Free energies values are presented in kcal/mol, referring to
the initial intermediate A from Figure .
Conclusion
In summary, we have shown that 2-aryl-2-lithium-1,3-dithianes
undergo
autoxidative condensation forming α-thioether ketones orthothioesters
in reasonable to good yields upon aerobic oxidation. The procedure
can be expanded to other benzaldehyde derived dithioacetals, affording
orthothioesters and α-thioether ketones in good to excellent
yields. 2-Alkyl substituted 1,3-dithianes also undergo a similar autoxidative
process upon treatment with n-BuLi and air exposure;
however, condensation of a third dithiane unit is hampered by presence
of enolizable positions on the condensation intermediate. DFT calculations
support a reaction mechanism that starts with the highly thermodynamic
favorable autoxidation of the organolithium dithiane, leading to formation
of the thioester that is further trapped by another 2-lithium-1,3-dithiane.
The herein described process might be on the basis of the known limitations
on the use of 2-lithio-1,3-dithianes in synthetic chemistry, and it
is also a way to achieve highly functionalized and stable orthothioesters.
Experimental Section
General Remarks
Reactions were monitored through thin-layer
chromatography (TLC) with commercial silica gel plates (Merck silica
gel, 60 F254). Visualization of the developed plates was performed
under UV lights at 254 nm and by staining with cerium ammonium molybdate,
2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine and vanillin stains. Flash column chromatography
was performed on silica gel 60 (40–63 μm) as stationary
phase. Preparative TLCs were conducted on PLC silica gel 60 F254,
1 mm.1H NMR spectra were recorded at 300 MHz, 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 75 MHz and 19F spectrum
was recorded at 282 MHz in a 300 MHz Varian Mercury spectrometer,
using CDCl3 as solvent. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported
in ppm referenced to the CDCl3 residual peak (δ 7.26) or TMS
peak (δ 0.00) for 1H NMR and to CDCl3 (δ
77.16) for 13C NMR. The following abbreviations were used
to describe peak splitting patterns: s = singlet, d = doublet, t =
triplet, m = multiplet. Coupling constants, J, were
reported in Hertz (Hz). High-resolution mass spectra were recorded
on a Waters ESI-TOF MS spectrometer. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) was dried
by distillation under argon with sodium metal and benzophenone as
indicator. Dichloromethane (DCM) was dried by distillation under argon
with calcium hydride. Isotope labeled oxygen-18 (99% isotopic purity)
was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (CAS Number 32767–18–3).
A small balloon was filled with oxygen-18 and used directly in the
oxidation reaction.
General Procedure for Preparation of 2-Substituted
1,3-Dithianes
(Method A)
On the basis of a modified previously reported
method,[33] aldehyde (15 mmol, 1 equiv) and
1,3-propanedithiol (3 mL, 16.5 mmol, 1.1 equiv) were dissolved in
dichloromethane (50 mL) in a round-bottom flask. Iodine (381 mg, 1.5
mmol, 0.1 equiv) was slowly added do the stirring solution as to prevent
vigorous boiling of the solvent. The reaction was quenched with a
2% Na0S2O3 aqueous solution (10 mL)
30 min after complete iodine addition. Upon separation, the organic
layer was washed successively with a 10% aqueous NaOH solution (10
mL), water (10 mL) and brine (10 mL). The organic solvent was dried
over MgSO4 and filtered. After evaporating the solvent,
the product was recrystallized in isopropanol. Note: Reactions were
conducted in different scales depending on availability of aldehyde
starting material.
4a
Prepared according to method
A. 77% yield (3.425
g, 17.45 mmol), white crystals. Obtained with same spectral characterization
as previously described.[34]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.49–7.45 (m,
2H), 7.37–7.29 (m, 3H), 5.17 (s, 1H), 3.12–3.02 (m,
2H), 2.95–2.88 (m, 2H), 2.22–2.14 (m, 1H), 2.01–1.86
(m, 1H).
4b
Prepared according to a modified
previously reported
method.[35] 4-(Dimethylamino)benzaldehyde
(1 g, 6.7 mmol, 1 equiv) and 1,3-propanedithiol (0.74 mL, 7.4 mmol,
1.1 equiv) were dissolved in 10 mL of dry DCM in an argon purged round-bottom
flask. The solution was cooled to 0 °C and BF3·OEt2 (1.16 mL, 9.4 mmol, 1.4 equiv) was added dropwise. The solution
was then left warming to room temperature for 1 h. The reaction was
quenched with a 10% aqueous NaOH solution (10 mL). The layers were
separated and the organic phase collected and washed with water (10
mL) and Brine (10 mL). The organic solvent was dried over MgSO4 and filtered. After evaporation of the solvent, the product
was recrystallized from isopropanol to give 4b as yellow
crystals in 93% yield (1.498 g, 6.26 mmol). Obtained with same spectral
characterization as previously described.[36]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.33 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.67 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H),
5.12 (s, 1H), 3.17–2.86 (m, 4H), 2.94 (s, 6H), 2.20–2.10
(m, 1H), 1.97–1.82 (m, 1H).
4c
Prepared according
to method A. 89% yield (2.997
g, 13.54 mmol), white crystals. Obtained with same spectral characterization
as previously described.[34]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.65–7.57 (m,
4H), 5.17 (s, 1H), 3.11–3.01 (m, 2H), 2.96–2.90 (m,
2H), 2.23–2.15 (m, 1H), 2.01–1.86 (m, 1H).
4d
Prepared according to method A. 81% yield (3.628
g, 13.18 mmol), white crystals. Obtained with same spectral characterization
as previously described.[34]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.49–7.44 (m,
2H), 7.37–7.32 (m, 2H), 5.11 (s, 1H), 3.10–3.00 (m,
2H), 2.94–2.86 (m, 2H), 2.22–2.12 (m, 1H), 1.99–1.84
ppm (m, 1H).
4e
Prepared according to method
A. 76% yield (1.515
g, 7.07 mmol), white crystals. Obtained with same spectral characterization
as previously described.[37]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.47–7.42 (m,
2H), 7.05–6.99 (m, 2H), 5.14 (s, 1H), 3.10–3.01 (m,
2H), 2.94–2.87 (m, 2H), 2.22–2.13 (m, 1H), 1.99–1.84
(m, 1H).
4f
Prepared according to method
A. 69% yield (1.253
g, 5.96 mmol), white crystals. Obtained with same spectral characterization
as previously described.[34]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.61–7.57 (m,
1H), 7.24–7.13 (m, 3H), 5.33 (s, 1H), 3.14–3.04 (m,
2H), 2.95–2.88 (m, 2H), 2.45 (s, 3H), 2.23–2.14 (m,
1H), 2.02–1.87 (m, 1H).
Prepared according
to method A. 76% yield (1.172
g, 4.57 mmol), white crystals. Obtained with same spectral characterization
as previously described.[34]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.15 (dd, J = 2.3, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.83–6.76 (m, 2H), 5.67 (s, 1H), 3.82
(s, 3H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.16–3.06 (m, 2H), 2.93–2.86
(m, 2H), 2.20–2.12 (m, 1H), 2.01–1.86 (m, 1H).
4i
Prepared according to a modified previously reported
method.[38] Freshly distilled picolinaldehyde
(1 mL, 10.51 mmol, 1 equiv) and 1,3-propanedithiol (1.16 mL, 11.56
mmol, 1.1 equiv) were dissolved in DCE (20 mL). p-Toluenosulfonic acid (200 mg, 1.05 mmol, 0.1 equiv) was added to
the mixture and the solution refluxed for 24 h. The reaction was cooled
to room temperature and quenched with a 10% aqueous NaOH solution
(10 mL). The layers were separated and the organic phase collected
and washed with water (10 mL) and brine (10 mL). The organic solvent
was dried over MgSO4 and filtered. The solvent was evaporated
and the product isolated by flash chromatography (Hex:AcOEt, 70:30)
to give 4i as a yellow solid in 54% yield (1.111 g, 5.63
mmol), with same spectral characterization as previously described.[38]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.57 (dd, J = 4.4, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.67
(td, J = 7.6, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.22–7.18 (m, 1H), 5.35 (s, 1H), 3.11–2.92
(m, 4H), 2.23–2.13 (m, 1H), 2.05–1.90 (m, 1H).
4-(1,3-Dithian-2-yl)-2-methoxyphenol
Prepared according
to method A and used in preparation of 4j and 4k. 84% yield (6.723 g, 27.73 mmol), white crystals. Obtained with
same spectral characterization as previously described.[39]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.00–6.84 (m, 2H), 6.87–6.84 (m, 1H),
5.64 (s, 1H), 5.11 (s, 1H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.10–2.87 (m, 2H),
2.93–2.86 (m, 2H), 2.21–2.12 (m, 1H), 1.99–1.84
(m, 1H).
4j
4-(1,3-Dithian-2-yl)-2-methoxyphenol (0.5 g, 2.06
mmol, 1 equiv), imidazole (155 mg, 2.27 mmol, 1.1 equiv) and 4-dimethylaminopyridine
(25 mg, 0.2 mmol, 0.1 equiv) were dissolved in dry DCM (10 mL), in
an argon purged round-bottom flask. Then, tert-butyl(chloro)diphenylsilane
was added dropwise to the stirring solution. The mixture was left
stirring at room temperature for 24 h. The reaction was quenched with
H2O (10 mL) and the layers were separated. The organic
layer was collected and washed with water (10 mL) and Brine (10 mL),
dried over MgSO4, filtered and evaporated. The product
was purified by flash chromatography (Hex:DCM, 1:1) to yield 4j in 93% yield (918 mg, 1.91 mmol) as a colorless thick oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.69 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.8 Hz, 4H), 7.42–7.31 (m, 6H), 6.89 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.76–6.73 (m, 1H), 6.55–6.63
(m, 1H), 5.05 (s, 1H), 3.57 (s, 3H), 3.07–2.98 (m, 2H), 2.91–2.83
(m, 2H), 2.18–2.09(m, 1H), 1.96–1.81 (m, 1H), 1.10 ppm
(s, 9H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm
150.6, 145.2, 135.5, 133.6, 132.3, 129.7, 127.6, 120.2, 120.0, 111.8,
55.5, 51.5, 32.3, 26.8, 25.2, 19.9. HR-MS (ESI) m/z calculated for C27H33O2S2Si+ [M + H]+ 481.1686,
found 481.1687.
4k
4-(1,3-Dithian-2-yl)-2-methoxyphenol
(0.8 g, 3.30
mmol, 1 equiv), imidazole (270 mg, 3.96 mmol, 1.2 equiv) and 4-dimethylaminopyridine
(42 mg, 0.34 mmol, 0.1 equiv) were dissolved in dry DCM (10 mL), in
an argon purged round-bottom flask. Then, tert-butyldimethylsilyl
chloride (597 mg, 3.96 mmol, 1.2 equiv) was added dropwise to the
stirring solution. The mixture was left stirring at room temperature
for 24 h. The reaction was quenched with H2O (10 mL) and
the layers were separated. The organic layer was collected and washed
with water (10 mL) and Brine (10 mL), dried over MgSO4,
filtered and evaporated. The product was purified by flash chromatography
(Hex:EtOAc, 95:5) to yield 4k in 90% yield (1.056 mg,
2.86 mmol) as a colorless thick oil with same spectral characterization
as previously described.[40]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 6.97 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.92–6.89 (m, 1H), 6.79–6.76 (m, 1H),
5.11 (s, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.10–3.01 (m, 2H), 2.93–2.86
(m, 2H), 2.21–2.11 (m, 1H), 1.99–1.84 (m, 1H), 0.98
(s, 9H), 0.14 (s, 6H).
4l
Prepared according to a modified
previously reported
method.[41] In an argon purged round-bottom
flask were added 10 mL of dry DCM, 5 mL of glacial acetic acid, and
BF3·OEt2 (2.47 mL, 20 mmol, 1 equiv). Then,
a solution of 1,3-propanedithiol (2 mL, 20 mmol, 1 equiv) and chloromethyl
methyl ether (1.67 mL, 22 mmol, 1.1 equiv) in 30 mL of dry DCM was
added dropwise for 10 min at room temperature. The solution was left
stirring for 3 h at room temperature, and then quenched with 40 mL
of water. The layers were separated and the organic phase collected
and washed with water (40 mL), a 10% aqueous NaOH solution (2 ×
40 mL) and brine (40 mL). The organic solvent was dried over MgSO4, filtered and evaporated. Sublimation under reduced pressure
gave pure 4l as a white solid in 32% yield (778 mg, 6.47
mmol), with same spectral characterization as previously described.[42]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 3.78 (s, 2H), 2.84–2.80 (m, 4H), 2.11–2.03
(m, 2H).
4m
Prepared according to method
A. 53% yield (560 mg,
2.66 mmol), pale green solid. 1.2 equiv of 1,3-propanedithiol were
used. Obtained with same spectral characterization as previously described,[43] after purification by flash chromatography (Hex:EtOAc,
85:15). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm
7.34–7.22 (m, 5H), 4.24 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H),
3.02 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.85–2.80 (m, 4H),
2.15–2.05 (m, 1H), 1.92–1.79 (m, 1H).
4n
Prepared according to a modified previously reported
method.[35] Butyraldehyde (0.45 mL, 5 mmol,
1 equiv) and 1,3-propanedithiol (0.6 mL, 6 mmol, 1.2 equiv) were dissolved
in 20 mL of dry DCM under argon. The solution was stirred at room
temperature and BF3·OEt2 (0.43 mL, 0.7
mmol, 0.7 equiv) was added dropwise. After 90 min, the reaction was
quenched by washing the reaction mixture twice with 20 mL of 10% aqueous
NaOH. The combined aqueous layers were then extracted twice with 20
mL of DCM. The organic layers were combined, washed with 25 mL of
brine and dried over MgSO4. The organic solvent was evaporated
under reduced pressure and the resulting oil was purified by flash
chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 97:3), which afforded 4n as a colorless oil in 99% yield (808 mg, 4.98 mmol). Obtained with
same spectral characterization as previously described.[34]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 4.05 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 2.92–2.76
(m, 4H), 2.14–2.06 (m, 1H), 1.90–1.77 (m, 1H), 1.75–1.67
(m, 2H), 1.59–1.45 (m, 2H), 0.85–0.97 (m, 3H).
4o
Prepared according to a modified previously reported
method.[44] Pivalaldehyde (5 mmol, 1 equiv)
and N-bromosuccinimide (178 mg, 1 mmol, 0.2 equiv)
were dissolved in CH2Cl2 (25 mL). The solution
was then stirred under argon at rt and 1,3-propanedithiol (1.2 equiv)
was added dropwise. The reaction was monitored by TLC and quenched
with 10% aqueous NaOH (25 mL) when the aldehyde was consumed (30–80
min). Aqueous and organic layers were separated and the aqueous layer
was washed with CH2Cl2 (2 × 25 mL). The
combined organic layers were washed with 25 mL brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. 62% yield
(544 mg, 3.08 mmol), white solid was obtained with same spectral characterization
as previously described.[34]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 3.99 (s, 1H), 2.90–2.86
(m, 4H), 2.11–2.02 (m, 1H), 1.86–1.74 (m, 1H), 1.10
(s, 9H).
General
Procedure for Preparation of Dithioacetals 6 (Method
B)
On the basis of a modified previously reported
method,[44] aldehyde (5 mmol, 1 equiv) and N-bromosuccinimide (178 mg, 1 mmol, 0.2 equiv) were dissolved
in CH2Cl2 (25 mL). The solution was then stirred
under argon at rt and thiol (2.5 equiv) was added dropwise. The reaction
was monitored by TLC and quenched with 10% aqueous NaOH (25 mL) when
the aldehyde was consumed (30–80 min). Aqueous and organic
layers were separated and the aqueous layer was washed with CH2Cl2 (2 × 25 mL). The combined organic layers
were washed with 25 mL brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered
and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was then
purified by recrystallization or by flash chromatography.
6a
Prepared according to a modified previously reported
method.[33] Benzaldehyde (0.51 mL, 5 mmol,
1 equiv) and benzenethiol (1.08 mL, 10.5 mmol, 2.1 equiv) were dissolved
in CHCl3 (25 mL). The solution was then stirred at rt and
I2 (0.13 g, 0.5 mmol, 0.1 equiv) was added. The reaction
was monitored by TLC. When the aldehyde was consumed (30 min) the
reaction was quenched with aqueous Na2S2O3 (0.1 M, 25 mL) and then washed twice with 10% aqueous NaOH
(25 mL). Aqueous and organic layers were separated and the aqueous
layer was washed with CHCl3 (25 mL). The combined organic
layers were washed with 20 mL of H2O, dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to yield
the crude product. The crude product was then purified by recrystallization
from hexane to afford 6a as white crystals in 66% yield
(1.01 g, 3.28 mmol) with the same spectral characterization as previously
described.[45]1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) δ ppm 7.39–7.20 (m, 15H), 5.42 (s,
1H).
Prepared according to a modified previously reported
method.[33] Benzaldehyde (2 mL, 19.7 mmol,
1 equiv) and dodecanethiol (10.4 mL, 43.3 mmol, 2.2 equiv) were dissolved
in dichloromethane (30 mL) in a round-bottom flask. Then, iodine (508,
2 mmol, 0.1 equiv) was slowly added do the stirring solution as to
prevent vigorous boiling of the solvent. After 2 h of complete addition,
the reaction was quenched with a 2% Na2S2O3 aqueous solution (10 mL). The layers were separated and the
organic layer collected and washed successively with a 10% aqueous
NaOH solution (10 mL), water (10 mL) and brine (10 mL). The organic
solvent was dried over MgSO4 and filtered. After evaporating
the solvent, the product was purified by flash chromatography (hexane)
to give 6c as a white amorphous solid in 57% yield (5.563
g, 11.29 mmol). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ
ppm 7.45–7.42 (m, 2H), 7.35–7.22 (m, 3H), 4.86 (s, 1H),
2.62–2.45 (m, 4H), 1.59–1.49 (m, 4H), 1.35–1.24
(m, 36H), 0.90–0.86 (m, 6H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ ppm 140.8, 128.6, 127.9, 127.8, 53.3, 32.4, 32.1,
29.8, 29.7, 29.6, 29.5, 29.3, 29.3, 29.0, 22.8, 14.3. HR-MS (ESI) m/z calculated for C31H55S2+ [M – H]+ 491.3740,
found 491.3757.
Prepared according to a modified previously reported
method.[46] Benzil (1g, 4.76 mmol, 1.2 equiv)
was dissolved in dry DCM (5 mL) in an argon purged round-bottom flask.
The solution was cooled to 0 °C in an ice bath bath. A solution
of 1,3-propanedithiol (398 μL, 3.96 mmol, 1 equiv) and BF3·Et2O (489 μL, 3.96 mmol, 1 equiv) in
dry DCM (1.5 mL) was added dropwise at 0 °C. The solution was
warmed to room temperature for 3 h and quenched with 10 mL of a saturated
aqueous NaHCO3 solution. The layers were separated and
the organic phase collected. The aqueous phase was extracted with
DCM (3 × 10 mL) and the organic phases combined, dried over MgSO4, filtered and the solvent evaporated. The dry crude was dissolved
in hot isopropanol and left cooling at room temperature. After 3 h,
the product precipitated as a white solid and was filtered and washed
with cold isopropanol to yield 12 as a white solid in
54% yield (641 mg, 2.13 mmol). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.69–7.66 (m, 2H), 7.57 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.38–7.28 (m, 4H), 7.22–7.17
(m, 2H), 3.26 (ddd, J = 14.4, 12.0, 2.9 Hz, 2H),
2.80–2.73 (m, 2H), 2.17–2.08 (m, 1H), 2.01–1.86
(m, 1H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm
192.8, 139.0, 134.5, 132.2, 130.8, 129.2, 128.8, 127.7, 127.5, 63.5,
29.3, 24.1. HR-MS (ESI) m/z calculated
for C17H17OS2+ [M + H]+ 301.0715, found 301.0734.
General Procedure for Autoxidative
Addition of Dithianes 4a–c and 4e–k
Dithiane (1.02 mmol, 1 equiv)
was dissolved in
dry THF (5 mL) in an argon purged round-bottom flask. The solution
was cooled to −78 °C in an acetone/liquid nitrogen bath. n-BuLi (1.3 equiv) solution in hexanes was added dropwise
to the reaction mixture at −78 °C. The solution was left
stirring at −78 °C for 20 min and then left to warm up
to room temperature for 40 min. The argon balloon was replaced with
an atmospheric air balloon and an additional needle was inserted in
the septum as to allow air flow through the surface of the solution.
As oxidation took place the solution warmed up and color change was
usually observed. After 1 min the solution was quenched with 10 mL
of a saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution. Ten mL of Et2O were added and the layers were separated. The organic phase
was collected and the aqueous phase was extracted two times with Et2O (2 × 10 mL). The organic phases were combined and dried
over MgSO4. The solvent was filtered and evaporated. The
product was purified by flash chromatography.
Dithiane 4d (281
mg, 1.02 mmol, 1 equiv)
was dissolved in dry THF (5 mL) in an argon purged round-bottom flask.
The solution was cooled to −78 °C in an acetone/liquid
nitrogen bath. LDA (0.85 mL of a 1.5 M solution, 1.3 equiv) solution
in hexanes was added dropwise to the reaction mixture at −78
°C. The solution was left stirring at −78 °C for
20 min and then left to warm up to room temperature for 40 min. The
argon balloon was replaced with an atmospheric air balloon and an
additional needle was inserted in the septum as to allow air flow
through the surface of the solution. As oxidation took place the solution
warmed up and color change was observed. After 1 min the solution
was quenched with 10 mL of a saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution.
The aqueous layer was extracted three times with Et2O (3
× 10 mL). The organic phases were combined and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was evaporated and the product purified by flash
chromatography (eluent Hex:AcOEt, 90:10) to afford the desired compound 5d in 51% yield (127 mg, 0.17 mmol) as a pale yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.83–7.77
(m, 4H), 7.59–7.54 (m, 2H), 7.50–7.44 (m, 4H), 7.32–7.26
(m, 2H), 5.37 (s, 1H), 3.29–3.19 (m, 2H), 2.75–2.69
(m, 2H), 2.59–2.45 (m, 4H), 2.13–2.03 (m, 1H), 1.96–1.82
(m, 1H), 1.76–1.66 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 193.5, 140.7, 135.4, 134.2, 132.2, 132.2, 131.7,
130.6, 130.5, 129.9, 128.9, 122.7, 122.4, 63.7, 54.5, 32.6, 30.7,
29.3, 28.3, 24.2. HR-MS (ESI) m/z calculated for C27H24Br3OS4– [M – H]− 728.8266,
found 728.8265.
General Procedure for Autoxidative Addition
of Dithioacetals 6a–6d
Dithioacetal 6 (1.02 mmol, 1 equiv) was dissolved in dry THF (5 mL) in
an argon
purged round-bottom flask. The solution was cooled to −78 °C
in an acetone/liquid nitrogen bath. n-BuLi (1.3 equiv)
solution in hexanes was added dropwise to the reaction mixture at
−78 °C. The solution was left stirring at −78 °C
for 20 min and then left to warm up to room temperature for 40 min.
The argon balloon was replaced with an atmospheric air balloon and
an additional needle was inserted in the septum as to allow air flow
through the surface of the solution. After 1 min the solution was
quenched with 10 mL of a saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution.
Ten mL of Et2O were added and the layers were separated.
The organic phase was collected and the aqueous phase was extracted
two times with Et2O (2 × 10 mL). The organic phases
were combined and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was filtered
and evaporated. Products 7 and 8 were obtained
after purification by flash chromatography.
7a
48% yield (97
mg, 0.32 mmol), white solid. Flash
chromatography eluent: Hex:AcOEt (97.5:2.5). 1H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.94–7.90 (m, 2H), 7.49–7.44
(m, 1H), 7.38–7.17 (m, 12H), 5.85 (s, 1H). 13C NMR
(75 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 194.8, 136.6, 135.6, 134.1,
133.4, 133.1, 129.0, 128.9, 128.8, 128.7, 128.1, 128.0, 60.4. HR-MS
(ESI) m/z calculated for C20H17OS+ [M + H]+ 305.0995, found
305.1013. The corresponding orthothioester product, 8a could not be isolated due to low polarity and structural similarity
to 6a. However, the following characteristic peaks for
the 8a can be observed from the NMR spectrum of a mixture
with the dithioacetal. 8a: 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3): 7.69–7.64 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (75
MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 139.4, 132.9, 128.8, 128.4, 128.3,
128.0, 127.9, 77.0.
67% yield (63 mg, 0.22 mmol),
pale yellow solid.
1:1 mixture of diastereomers. Flash chromatography eluent: Hex:AcOEt
(95:5). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm
8.01–7.97 (m, 4H), 7.54–7.23 (m, 16H), 5.61 (s, 2H),
2.75–2.61 (m, 2H), 1.72–1.42 (m, 4H), 1.30 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H), 1.19 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H),
0.98–0.86 (m, 6H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 195.5, 195.4, 137.2, 135.9, 133.3, 129.0, 128.9, 128.9,
128.7, 127.9, 54.7, 54.6, 42.1, 41.9, 29.7, 29.7, 21.0, 20.6, 11.3,
11.2. HR-MS (ESI) m/z calculated
for C18H21OS+ [M + H]+ 285.1308, found 285.1303. The corresponding orthothioester product 8d could not be isolated due to low polarity and structural
similarity to 6d. However, the following characteristic
peaks for 8d can be observed in NMR spectrum of the crude
reaction mixture: 8d: 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 69.3, 29.0, 20.1, 11.5.
9
Dithioacetal 6e (0.5 mmol, 1 equiv)
was dissolved in dry THF (2.5 mL) in an argon purged round-bottom
flask. The solution was cooled to −78 °C in an acetone/liquid
nitrogen bath. n-BuLi (1.3 equiv) solution in hexanes
was added dropwise to the reaction mixture at −78 °C.
The solution was left stirring at −78 °C for 20 min and
then left to warm up to room temperature for 40 min. The argon balloon
was replaced with an atmospheric air balloon and an additional needle
was inserted in the septum as to allow air flow through the surface
of the solution. After 1 min the solution was quenched with 5 mL of
a saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution. Five mL of Et2O were added and the layers were separated. The organic phase was
collected and the aqueous phase was extracted two times with Et2O (2 × 5 mL). The organic phases were combined and dried
over MgSO4. The solvent was evaporated and the product
was purified by preparative TLC (eluent: pentane) to yield 9 as a colorless oil (62%, 60 mg, 0.31 mmol) with the same spectral
characterization as previously described.[47]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.93–7.90
(m, 2H), 7.56–7.51 (m, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.44–7.39
(m, 2H), 1.58 (s, 9H).
General Procedure for Autoxidative
Addition of 2-Alkyl-1,3-dithianes 4l–p
Dithiane (1.02 mmol, 1 equiv)
was dissolved in dry THF (5 mL) in an argon purged round-bottom flask.
The solution was cooled to −78 °C in an acetone/liquid
nitrogen bath. n-BuLi (1.3 equiv) solution in hexanes
was added dropwise to the reaction mixture at −78 °C.
The solution was left stirring at −78 °C for 20 min and
then left to warm up to room temperature for 40 min. The argon balloon
was replaced with an atmospheric air balloon and an additional needle
was inserted in the septum as to allow air flow through the surface
of the solution. After 5 min the solution was quenched with 10 mL
of a saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution. Ten mL of Et2O were added and the layers were separated. The organic phase
was collected and the aqueous phase was extracted two times with Et2O (2 × 10 mL). The organic phases were combined and dried
over MgSO4. The solvent was filtered and evaporated. The
product was purified and separated from unreacted starting material
by flash chromatography.
Dithiane 4a (200 mg,
1.02 mmol, 1 equiv) was dissolved in dry THF (5
mL) in an argon purged round-bottom flask. The solution was cooled
to −78 °C in an acetone/liquid nitrogen bath. n-BuLi (0.53 mL of a 2.5 M solution, 1.32 mmol, 1.3 equiv)
solution in hexanes was added dropwise to the reaction mixture at
−78 °C. The solution was left stirring at −78 °C
for 20 min and then left to warm up to room temperature for 40 min.
Benzoyl chloride (77 μL, 0.66 mmol, 0.65 equiv) was added dropwise
to the solution and after 2 min, while under argon, the reaction was
quenched with 10 mL of a saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution.
Ten mL of Et2O were added and the layers were separated.
The organic phase was collected and the aqueous phase was extracted
two times with Et2O (2 × 10 mL). The organic phases
were combined and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was filtered
and evaporated. The product was purified by flash chromatography (eluent
Hex:AcOEt, 90:10) to afford 5a in 71% yield (180 mg,
0.36 mmol) as a pale yellow oil.
Reaction of 4a with S-Benzyl Benzothioate
Dithiane 4a (200 mg, 1.02 mmol, 1 equiv) was dissolved
in dry THF (5 mL) in an argon purged round-bottom flask. The solution
was cooled to −78 °C in an acetone/liquid nitrogen bath. n-BuLi (0.53 mL of a 2.5 M solution, 1.32 mmol, 1.3 equiv)
solution in hexanes was added dropwise to the reaction mixture at
−78 °C. The solution was left stirring at −78 °C
for 20 min and then left to warm up to room temperature for 40 min.
Then, S-benzyl benzothioate (151 mg, 0.66 mmol, 0.65
equiv) in dry THF (1 mL) was added dropwise to the solution. After
2 min, while under argon, the reaction was quenched with 10 mL of
a saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution. Ten mL of Et2O were added and the layers were separated. The organic phase was
collected and the aqueous phase was extracted two times with Et2O (2 × 10 mL). The organic phases were combined and dried
over MgSO4. The solvent was filtered and evaporated. The
product was purified by flash chromatography (eluent Hex:AcOEt, 90:10)
to afford 5a in 89% yield (226 mg, 0.45 mmol) as a pale
yellow oil.
Reaction of 4a in the Presence
of 18O2
General procedure for autoxidative
addition
of dithianes was used, although a small ballon filled with 18O2 was used directly in the oxidation reaction. HR-MS
(ESI) m/z calculated for C27H2818OS4Na+ [M + Na]+ 521.0958, found 521.0930.
Reaction of 4a in the Presence of TEMPO
Dithiane 4a (200
mg, 1.02 mmol, 1 equiv) was dissolved
in dry THF (5 mL) in an argon purged round-bottom flask. The solution
was cooled to −78 °C in an acetone/liquid nitrogen bath. n-BuLi (0.53 mL of a 2.5 M solution, 1.3 equiv) solution
in hexanes was added dropwise to the reaction mixture at −78
°C. The solution was left stirring at −78 °C for
20 min and then left to warm up to room temperature for 40 min. Then,
TEMPO (206 mg in 1.5 mL of dry THF, 1.12 mmol, 1.3 equiv) was added
dropwise to the solution. After 2 min, the argon balloon was replaced
with an atmospheric air balloon and an additional needle was inserted
in the septum as to allow air flow through the surface of the solution.
After 1 min the solution was quenched with 10 mL of a saturated aqueous
NH4Cl solution. Ten mL of Et2O were added and
the layers were separated. The organic phase was collected and the
aqueous phase was extracted two times with Et2O (2 ×
10 mL). The organic phases were combined and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was filtered and evaporated. Flash chromatography (Hex:AcOEt,
95:5) yielded starting material 4a (20%, 39 mg, 0.20
mmol) and dimer 2 (27%, 53 mg, 0.14 mmol) as a white
solid, with same spectral characterization as previously described.[49]2: 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) δ ppm 7.54–7.15 (m, 10H), 2.70–2.49
(m, 8H), 2.01–1.75 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 135.0, 133.0, 127.6, 127.3, 70.9, 29.0, 24.7.
Reaction of 4a with 12
Dithiane 4a (200 mg, 1.02 mmol, 1 equiv) was dissolved in dry THF (5
mL, 0.2 M) in an argon purged round-bottom flask. The solution was
cooled to −78 °C in an acetone/liquid nitrogen bath. n-BuLi (0.45 mL of a 2.5 M solution, 1.12 mmol, 1.1 equiv)
solution in hexanes was added dropwise to the reaction mixture at
−78 °C. The solution was left stirring at −78 °C
for 20 min and then left to warm up to room temperature for 40 min.
Phenyl(2-phenyl-1,3-dithian-2-yl)methanone 12 (337 mg,
1.12 mmol, 1.1 equiv) in THF (5 mL) was added dropwise to the solution.
After 2 min, while under argon, the reaction was quenched with 10
mL of a saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution. Ten mL of Et2O were added and the layers were separated. The organic phase
was collected and the aqueous phase was extracted two times with Et2O (2 × 10 mL). The organic phases were combined and dried
over MgSO4. The solvent was filtered, evaporated and the
product purified by flash chromatography (eluent Hex:AcOEt, 90:10)
to afford 5a in 75% yield (381 mg, 0.77 mmol) as a pale
yellow oil.
Authors: Matthias Henrot; Martin E A Richter; Jacques Maddaluno; Christian Hertweck; Michaël De Paolis Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2012-07-16 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Nisalak Trongsiriwat; Youge Pu; Yexenia Nieves-Quinones; Russell A Shelp; Marisa C Kozlowski; Patrick J Walsh Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Anisha Viswanathan; Aliyu Musa; Akshaya Murugesan; João R Vale; Carlos A M Afonso; Saravanan Konda Mani; Olli Yli-Harja; Nuno R Candeias; Meenakshisundaram Kandhavelu Journal: Cells Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 6.600