Literature DB >> 29334278

A comparative safety review between GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors for diabetes treatment.

Agostino Consoli1, Gloria Formoso1, Maria Pompea Antonia Baldassarre1, Fabrizio Febo1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are of particular interest in type 2 diabetes treatment strategies, due to their efficacy in reducing HbA1c with a low risk of hypoglycaemia, to their positive effects on body weight and blood pressure and in light of their effects on cardiovascular risk and on nephroprotection emerged from the most recent cardiovascular outcome trials. Since it is therefore very likely that GLP-1RA and SGLT2i use will become more and more common, it is more and more important to gather and discuss information about their safety profile. AREAS COVERED: Adverse events and the safety concerns most often emerged in trials with GLP-1RA namely, exenatide long acting release (LAR), dulaglutide, liraglutide, semaglutide, lixisenatide or SGLT2i, namely empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin and SGLT2i with an attempt at comparing the safety profiles of molecules of these two classes. EXPERT OPINION: GLP-1RA and SGLT2i, although each associated with different specific side effects, share a 'similar' safety profile and are both drugs relatively easy to handle. The potentially complementary mechanisms of action, the cardio and nephroprotective effects demonstrated by molecules of both classes, make these drugs potentially useful even in add on to each other.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GLP-1 receptor agonists; SGLT2 inhibitors; cardiovascular; outcome studies; safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29334278     DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2018.1428305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf        ISSN: 1474-0338            Impact factor:   4.250


  4 in total

1.  Combining Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors to Target Multiple Organ Defects in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  John E Anderson
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2020-05

2.  Comparative risk evaluation for cardiovascular events associated with dapagliflozin vs. empagliflozin in real-world type 2 diabetes patients: a multi-institutional cohort study.

Authors:  Shih-Chieh Shao; Kai-Cheng Chang; Ming-Jui Hung; Ning-I Yang; Yuk-Ying Chan; Hui-Yu Chen; Yea-Huei Kao Yang; Edward Chia-Cheng Lai
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 9.951

Review 3.  Antidiabetic Therapy in the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Yoshio Sumida; Masashi Yoneda; Katsutoshi Tokushige; Miwa Kawanaka; Hideki Fujii; Masato Yoneda; Kento Imajo; Hirokazu Takahashi; Yuichiro Eguchi; Masafumi Ono; Yuichi Nozaki; Hideyuki Hyogo; Masahiro Koseki; Yuichi Yoshida; Takumi Kawaguchi; Yoshihiro Kamada; Takeshi Okanoue; Atsushi Nakajima; Japan Study Group Of Nafld Jsg-Nafld
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Risk of amputation with canagliflozin across categories of age and cardiovascular risk in three US nationwide databases: cohort study.

Authors:  Michael Fralick; Seoyoung C Kim; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Brendan M Everett; Robert J Glynn; Elisabetta Patorno
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-08-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.