Literature DB >> 29334237

Safety of working patterns among UK neuroradiologists: what can we learn from the aviation industry and cognitive science?

John Reicher1, Stuart Currie2, Daniel Birchall1.   

Abstract

As the volume and complexity of imaging in the UK continues to rise, there is pressure on radiologists to spend increasing lengths of time reporting to cope with the growing workload. However, there is limited guidance for radiologists about structuring the working day to strike the necessary balance between achieving satisfactory reporting volume and maintaining quality and safety. We surveyed 86 neuroradiologists (receiving 59 responses), regarding time spent reporting, frequency and duration of work breaks, and break activities. Our results demonstrate that some neuroradiologists report for up to 12 h a day and for 4 h before taking a break. Mean duration of breaks is less than 15 min and these often consist of computer screen-based or cognitively demanding tasks. Many areas of medicine have looked to the aviation industry to develop improvements in safety through regulated, standardised practices. There are parallels between the work of air traffic controllers (ATCs) and radiologists. We review the legislation that controls the working hours of UK ATCs to minimise fatigue-related errors, and its scientific basis. We also consider the vigilance decrement, a concept in cognitive science which describes the reduction in performance with increasing time-on-task. We conclude that, in comparison with ATCs, work patterns among radiologists are poorly standardised and potentially dangerous. Evidence suggests that placing limits on reporting time and minimum break duration, as well as ensuring appropriate break activities, can benefit reporting quality. It is imperative that radiologists and managers heed these lessons, to improve standards and protect patients from error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29334237      PMCID: PMC5965984          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  17 in total

1.  The vigilance decrement reflects limitations in effortful attention, not mindlessness.

Authors:  Rebecca A Grier; Joel S Warm; William N Dember; Gerald Matthews; Traci L Galinsky; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  PERFORMANCE DECREMENT IN VIGILANCE, THRESHOLD, AND HIGH-SPEED PERCEPTUAL MOTOR TASKS.

Authors:  J F MACKWORTH
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1964-09

Review 3.  The insidious problem of fatigue in medical imaging practice.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Elizabeth Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Brief and rare mental "breaks" keep you focused: deactivation and reactivation of task goals preempt vigilance decrements.

Authors:  Atsunori Ariga; Alejandro Lleras
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-01-05

5.  Prevalence of eye strain among radiologists: influence of viewing variables on symptoms.

Authors:  Talia Vertinsky; Bruce Forster
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Vigilance, alertness, or sustained attention: physiological basis and measurement.

Authors:  B S Oken; M C Salinsky; S M Elsas
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  The Medical Image Perception Society update on key issues for image perception research.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Black times: temporal determinants of transport safety.

Authors:  S Folkard
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1997-07

9.  Changing the hours of shiftwork: a comparison of 8- and 12-hour shift rosters in a group of computer operators.

Authors:  A M Williamson; C G Gower; B C Clarke
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Retrospective review of the drop in observer detection performance over time in lesion-enriched experimental studies.

Authors:  Sian Taylor-Phillips; Markus C Elze; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kathryn Dennick; Alastair G Gale; Aileen Clarke; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  2 in total

1.  The importance of safe working legislation for neuroradiologists.

Authors:  Sanjeev Ramachandran; Robert William Foley; Harish Venkatesh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Variations in breast cancer detection rates during mammogram-reading sessions: does experience have an impact?

Authors:  Abdulaziz S Alshabibi; Moayyad E Suleiman; Salman M Albeshan; Robert Heard; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.039

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.