Zahra Shaaban1, Mohammad Reza Jafarzadeh Shirazi2, Mohammad Hossein Nooranizadeh3, Amin Tamadon3, Farhad Rahmanifar4, Somayeh Ahmadloo3, Amin Ramezani5,6, Mohammad Javad Zamiri1, Iman Razeghian Jahromi7, Fatemeh Sabet Sarvestani3, Omid Koohi Hosseinabadi8. 1. Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. 2. Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. Electronic address: jafarzd@shirazu.ac.ir. 3. Stem Cell Technology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 4. Department of Basic Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. 5. Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 6. Institute for Cancer Research, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 7. Cardiovascular Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 8. Comparative and Experimental Medicine Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) as an complex
endocrine disorder in women is accompanied with ovarian
dysfunction, metabolic disorders (e.g., obesity), and
a myriad of causes, including genetic abnormalities, fetal
epigenetic alterations, maternal or postpubertal hormonal
imbalances, lifestyle, and environmental factors have been
explained (1), have been proposed to explain PCOS. However,
and despite the prevalence of PCOS and its effects
on health, the causes of this syndrome, especially in hypothalamus,
have been not completely understood.Common neuroendocrine disorder of PCOS, increased
frequency and amplitude pulses of gonadotropin releasing
hormone (GnRH) (2). Furthermore, elevated secretion and
pulse amplitude and frequency of luteinizing hormone (LH)
release are the prominent pathophysiological features of
PCOS (2, 3). LH secretion increment in 70% of women with
PCOS has been accessed; this increase accompanied with increases in LH/follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) ratio (3).
Suppression of FSH secretion inhibits proper development
of follicles and overproduction of LH led androgen synthesis
in follicular theca cells (2). Therefore, measuring of FSH
and LH levels in PCOS will reflect a GnRH pulse frequency.
Increase of both amount and pulse frequency of GnRH have
importance in pathophysiology of PCOS.On the other hand, some evidences show that PCOS
may be originated from dysfunctions in regulating neuronal
circuits of negative feedback of steroids to hypothalamus-
pituitary-gonads (HPG) axis (4). Furthermore,
it is possible that change in GnRH release inhibitors, such
as arginine-phenylalanine-amide (RFamide)-related peptide-
3 (RFRP3), may control the hormonal irregularities
of PCOS. RFRP3 neurons localize in the dorsomedial hypothalamic
nucleus (DMH) of rat brain (5). Furthermore,
peripheral or intracerebroventricular injection of RFRP3
inhibited LH secretion in sheep (6). Although, there is evidence
supporting the existence of the RFRP3 receptor in
the pituitary, but the inhibitory effect of RFRP3 neurons
on GnRH at the level of hypothalamus were achieved (7).
In general, the inhibitory signals of RFRP3 on GnRH neurons
allow preovulatory LH surge happen at the right time
(8). Also, there are reports that show PCOS is common in
nulliparity and multiple gravidity can reduce PCOS (9).
In the present study a constant light model was induced in
both nulliparous and uniparous rats to evaluate the mRNA
expression of RFRP3 in the DMH of PCOS rats.
Materials and Methods
All experimental procedures on rats were performed
based on the instructions of Animal Care Committee of
Shiraz University. The experimental procedure had been
approved by Chancellor of Research Committee of the
Shiraz University.
Animal and polycystic ovarian syndrome induction
In the experimental study, 30 female Sprague-Dawley rats
were purchased from and kept in the Center of Comparative
and Experimental Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical
Sciences. The rats were housed in standard condition of
laboratory animal center (22 ± 1°C temperature) and food
and water were available ad libitum. Twelve nulliparous (38
days-old, 177 ± 20 g) and 12 uniparous (80 days-old, 226
± 20 g) rats were randomly allocated into two PCOS and
control normal sub-groups (n=6). PCOS was induced using
constant light (10). Briefly, the both the PCOS sub-groups
were exposed to 90 days constant 24 hours per day fluorescent
light with 350 lux intensity to 1 m2 on floor. The control
normal sub-groups were housed in 12 hours light to 12 hours
dark condition. After 90 days, blood, brain and ovaries of the
PCOS and control rats were collected.Six remained nulliparous rats were used as the ovariectomized
control group for real-time polymerase chain reaction
(PCR). The ovariectomy was performed through a
ventral midline incision after anesthetizing with an intraperitoneal
injection of xylazine (7 mg/kg, Alfazyne, Netherlands)
and ketamine (100 mg/ kg, Netherlands). Brain
tissue sampling in this group was done after two weeks.
Sampling and histological evaluation
For sampling, the rats were euthanized with ether and
blood was sampled in tubes without anticoagulants by
cardiac puncture. Serum was collected by centrifuging
2000 rpm for 15 minutes and then stored at -80°C until
analysis.Brain was dissected out from skull and DMH was sampled
(11). In brief, the diencephalon was rapidly separated
in cold condition by an anterior coronal section to
the optic chiasm and a posterior coronal cut at the mammillary
bodies. To separate DMH from anteroventral
periventricular nucleus, the third coronal sectioning was
performed through the middle of the optic tract and rostral
to infundibulum. The samples were covered in aluminum
foil and rapidly stored in liquid nitrogen.Then ovaries were removed through ventral midline incision
and kept in 10% buffer formalin solution. Ovaries
were dehydrated by graded concentrations ethanol and xylene
and then were embedded in paraffin. Serial sectioning
was performed at thicknesses of 10 µm. Sections were
deparaffinized in 60°C. In room temperature, sections were
rehydrated in xylene and graded concentrations of ethanol.
Samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)
stain. Follicle types in ovarian sections were defined (12)
with light microscope (CX21, Olympus, Japan).
Measurements of serum hormone
Serum concentration of testosterone with 0.2 nmol/L
sensitivity (catalog# RK-61M, Institut des Isotopes Ltd,
Hungary) was measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA)
technique. In addition, serum concentrations of follicle
stimulating hormone with 0.09 mIU/mL sensitivity (catalog#
RF01N, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) and luteinizing
hormone with 0.22 mIU/mL sensitivity (catalog# RF03N,
Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) were determined using immunoradiometric
assay (IRMA) technique.
RFRP3 expression by real-time polymerase chain reaction
RFRP3 mRNA relative expression in DMH of rat brains
was measured (13). Total RNA from DMH was extracted
from the frozen brain samples after grounding it in liquid
nitrogen and adding extraction buffer by Tripure isolation
reagent kit (Roche Life Science, Branford, CT) according to
manufacturer's instructions. Brain samples were transferred
to the free RNase microtube and after mixing the solution
were kept at room temperature for 5 minutes. Then, 0.2 ml
chloroform was added to the solution and was held at room
temperature for 15 minutes. Afterwards, the supernatant
phase of mixture was transferred to another microtube after
centrifuging of mixture at 12,000 rpm for 20 minutes. The
same volume of isopropanol was added to the microtube. After
washing the RNA pellet with 75% ethanol, it was quickly
dried. The total purified RNA was measured by spectrophotometer (Nano-Drop ND-1000, Nano-Drop Technologies,
Wilmington, DE, USA). To ensure the removal of genomic
contamination, the DNase treatment was done using a DNase
kit (Fermentas, St. Leon-Roth, Germany). The first strand
cDNA synthesis using cDNA synthetize kit was performed
(Fermentas, St. Leon-Roth, Germany). Primers for RFRP3
target gene and rat ß-actin reference gene were designed using
Allele ID software version 6.0 (Premier Biosoft International,
USA). Relative real-time PCR reactions was performed by
20 µL real time master mix (Yekta Tajhiz Azma, Iran) containing
1 µL cDNA, 4 pmol of primer, and 1X SYBR Green
buffer. The cDNA samples were amplified (Table 1) by a StepOne
cycler (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). Amplification
condition was 15 minutes at 94°C, 40 cycles of 94°C 10 seconds,
58°C 15 seconds, and 72°C 30 seconds for RFRP and
15 minutes at 94°C, 40 cycles of 94°C 15 seconds, 57.8°C 20
seconds, and 72°C 30 seconds for ß-actin.
Table 1
Designed primers for arginine phenyl alanine related peptide-3 (RFRP3) and β-actin genes and their amplification reaction conditions
Gene
Primer sequencing (5ˊ-3ˊ)
Amplicon length (bp)
RFRP3
F: AAGACACTGGCTGGTTTG
192
R: TTGAAGGACTGGCTGGAG
β-actin
F: CCACACTTTCTACAATGAGC
169
R: ATACAGGGACAACACAGC
Designed primers for arginine phenyl alanine related peptide-3 (RFRP3) and β-actin genes and their amplification reaction conditionsFor quantitative assessment and evaluation of the relative
mRNA expression of RFRP3 gene the CT values were
estimated with real-time PCR Step One software version
2.1 (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). Accordingly, CT of
RFRP3 and CT of reference gene were entered in the 2-ΔΔCT
equation. ΔCT is a difference between the internal control
gene CT value and the target gene CT value. ΔΔCT was
obtained by subtracting the ΔCT of each sample from the
average of CT value of calibrators (ovariectomized rats).
Statistical analysis
The normality of data from hormone measurements and
the RFRP3 mRNA relative expression were evaluated by
the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Then, they were analyzed
by one-way ANOVA (SPSS for Windows, version 20, SPSS
Inc, Illinois), and mean differences was compared by post
hoc LSD test at P<0.05. Data are presented as mean and SE.
Results
Histological evaluation of ovaries
The microscopic evaluation of ovaries in the PCOS
groups showed formation of cystic follicles (Fig .1B, D)
in comparison with controls (Fig .1A, C) and alterations of
thickness and structure of follicular wall layers (Fig .2B, D)
in comparison with controls (Fig. 2A, C). Active corpora
lutea was not observed in the PCOS rats, but in the control
group numerous corpora lutea were obvious (Fig .1). The
number of the secondary follicles was lower in the PCOS
rats compared with control rats (Fig .3). In medulla, stroma
cells’ cytoplasm of the PCOS rats demonstrated high
amount of vesicles in comparison with controls (Fig .4).
Fig.1
Alterations of histological charecters of ovaries in the female nulliparous and the primiparous rats after the exposition to continuous light during
90 days. The control groups show normal ovarian feature with Several corpus luteum (white stars) and normal tertiarry follicles (arrows). The polycystic
ovary syndrome (PCOS)-induced groups showed considerably distended and cystic tertiary follicles [black stars, hematoxilin and eosin staining (H&E)]. A.
Nulliparous control, B. Nulliparous PCOS, C. Uniparous control, and D. Uniparous PCOS.
Fig.2
Alterations of tertiarry follicles features in the female nulliparous and the primiparous rats after continuous light exposure during 90 days. Ovary of
the control rat with normal tertiary follicles (white stars). Oocytes and corona radiata are absent in the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)-induced groups
and atretic follicles (black stars) are more observable [hematoxilin and eosin staining (H&E)]. A. Nulliparous control, B. Nulliparous PCOS, C. Uniparous
control, and D. Uniparous PCOS. [hematoxilin and eosin staining (H&E)]. PCOS; Polycystic ovary syndrome.
Fig.3
Decrease in the number of secondary follicles (stars) in ovary of the rat model of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in comparison with the control
rat [hematoxilin and eosin staining (H&E)]. A. Nulliparous control, B. Nulliparous PCOS, C. Uniparous control, and D. Uniparous PCOS. [hematoxilin and
eosin staining (H&E)]. PCOS; Polycystic ovary syndrome.
Fig.4
Hypertrophied and hyper-vaculated stromal cells in the ovarian medula of the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) rats in comparison with normal
stromal cells in the control rats [hematoxilin and eosin staining (H&E)]. A. Nulliparous control, B. Nulliparous PCOS, C. Uniparous control, and D. Uniparous
PCOS. [hematoxilin and eosin staining (H&E)]. PCOS; Polycystic ovary syndrome.
Alterations of histological charecters of ovaries in the female nulliparous and the primiparous rats after the exposition to continuous light during
90 days. The control groups show normal ovarian feature with Several corpus luteum (white stars) and normal tertiarry follicles (arrows). The polycystic
ovary syndrome (PCOS)-induced groups showed considerably distended and cystic tertiary follicles [black stars, hematoxilin and eosin staining (H&E)]. A.
Nulliparous control, B. Nulliparous PCOS, C. Uniparous control, and D. Uniparous PCOS.Alterations of tertiarry follicles features in the female nulliparous and the primiparous rats after continuous light exposure during 90 days. Ovary of
the control rat with normal tertiary follicles (white stars). Oocytes and corona radiata are absent in the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)-induced groups
and atretic follicles (black stars) are more observable [hematoxilin and eosin staining (H&E)]. A. Nulliparous control, B. Nulliparous PCOS, C. Uniparous
control, and D. Uniparous PCOS. [hematoxilin and eosin staining (H&E)]. PCOS; Polycystic ovary syndrome.Decrease in the number of secondary follicles (stars) in ovary of the rat model of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in comparison with the control
rat [hematoxilin and eosin staining (H&E)]. A. Nulliparous control, B. Nulliparous PCOS, C. Uniparous control, and D. Uniparous PCOS. [hematoxilin and
eosin staining (H&E)]. PCOS; Polycystic ovary syndrome.Serum testosterone concentrations of nulliparous
the PCOS rats was more than the nulliparous control
(Fig .5A, P<0.05), but not significantly different from
the uniparous rats (P>0.05). FSH and LH concentrations
were not significantly different between the control
and the PCOS sub-groups (Fig .5B, C, P>0.05).
Fig.5
Alterations of the mean (+SE) of serum hormone concentrations in
the female nulliparous and the primiparous rats after the exposition to
continuous light during 90 days for induction of polycystic ovary syndrome
(PCOS). A. Testestrone, B. Luteinizing hormone (LH), C. Follicle stimulating
hormone (FSH), and D. Decrease in the mean (+SE) expression of arginine
phenyl alanine related peptide-3 (RFRP3) mRNA in the dorsomedial nucleus
of hypothalamus of nulliparous PCOS-induced.
a,b; Different letters show statistically significant differences between
groups (P<0.05).
The RFRP3 gene expression in hypothalamus
The real-time PCR analysis showed that the expression
of RFRP3 gene in the PCOS groups reduced
(Fig .5D, P<0.05). Expressions of RFRP3 gene in the
uniparous rats of the PCOS and the control sub-groups
were not different (P>0.05).Hypertrophied and hyper-vaculated stromal cells in the ovarian medula of the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) rats in comparison with normal
stromal cells in the control rats [hematoxilin and eosin staining (H&E)]. A. Nulliparous control, B. Nulliparous PCOS, C. Uniparous control, and D. Uniparous
PCOS. [hematoxilin and eosin staining (H&E)]. PCOS; Polycystic ovary syndrome.Alterations of the mean (+SE) of serum hormone concentrations in
the female nulliparous and the primiparous rats after the exposition to
continuous light during 90 days for induction of polycystic ovary syndrome
(PCOS). A. Testestrone, B. Luteinizing hormone (LH), C. Follicle stimulating
hormone (FSH), and D. Decrease in the mean (+SE) expression of arginine
phenyl alanine related peptide-3 (RFRP3) mRNA in the dorsomedial nucleus
of hypothalamus of nulliparous PCOS-induced.a,b; Different letters show statistically significant differences between
groups (P<0.05).
Discussion
The present study for the first time showed that the
PCOS induction by constant light decreases RFRP3
gene expression in the DMH of rats in the nulliparous
group, an effect that was not observed in the uniparous
group. Consistent with our finding, in a prepubertal rat
model of androgen-induced PCOS, reduction in the transcription
of RFRP3 inhibitory neuropeptide in whole
hypothalamus has been recently reported (14). Furthermore,
in letrozole-induced PCOS rats, gene expression
of RFRP3 and increased in RFRP3 receptor in pituitary
was observed. Although, exogenous hormones may alter
the pathogenesis of PCOS in those models, our findings,
similar to (15), shows the role of RFRP signaling
in PCOS.In women suffering from PCOS, the concentrations
of LH increases and FSH decreases in comparison with
healthy women (16). Interestingly, in the current study,
long term constant light (90 days) with intensity of 350
lux increased the mean concentrations of LH and decreased
the mean of concentrations FSH in the uniparous
rats in comparison with the control group but the alterations
were not significant. Consistent with our findings,
100 days constant light exposures with about two times
illumination intensity (500-600 lux) in rats could induce
higher LH and lower FSH concentrations than the control
group (17). While, long term exposure to continuous
luminescence much lower than 350 lux (the rats were
kept in a room with light) could slightly increase LH
hypersecretion in rats (18), short-term continuous exposure
to light (3 days) could suppress the synthesis of LH
in female rat by reducing the sensitivity of the LH-releasing
hormone release centers to estrogen (19). Therefore,
increasing the intensity of the light could induce
alterations, akin to those observed in PCOS rat models,
to in gonadotropins concentrations in human PCOS.Hyperandrogenism is accepted as an important attribute
of PCOS; therefore, in most animal models of
PCOS, androgen hormones have been used to stimulate
the PCOS (20, 21). Although, these androgen models or
other hormone-induced models of PCOS, especially in
the prepubertal and pubertal models, have been used for
evaluation of hypothalamic functions in PCOS, but there
is a concern that these exogenous hormones may directly
disturb the neuronal circuits and the observed alternations
are not related to the induced PCOS. Therefore,
prenatal androgen models or non-hormonal induced
models of PCOS, such as constant light model of PCOS
(10), may demonstrate closer hypothalamic features of
PCOS to the human PCOS than the others.Increase in serum concentrations of testosterone in
the PCOS rats of the nulliparous group compared to the
controls showed the efficiency of this model for evaluation
of PCOS in hypothalamus without exogenous androgens.
Consistent with our findings, increase in serum
testosterone levels of rats that were exposed to 112 days
constant light exposures with illumination intensity of
600 lux was shown (22).To explain this phenomenon, it has been shown that
the testosterone concentrations are positively correlated
with the expression of the androgen receptor in the hypothalamic
suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). This locus
regulates circadian rhythms and light exposure controls
it (23). On the other hand, SCN sends direct and indirect
projections to DMH (24), which suggests the role of
SCN in control of DMH reproductive function, and can
also explain the observed relationship between testosterone
increase and constant light exposure. Furthermore,
it has been shown that SCN projects to RFRP neurons in
DMH of hamster (25). Therefore, our findings in combination
with previous findings, suggest the relationship of
RFRP3 in DMH and testosterone effects on SCN. However,
clarifying this pathway in pathogenesis of PCOS
needs further investigation.Histopathologic evaluation of ovaries showed that
continuous light exposure increased the number of antral
follicles and atretic follicles. Consistent with our results,
increase in large antral and atretic follicles and reduction
of the number of early growing follicles have been previously
reported in rats that were subjected to 13 weeks
of continuous exposure (26). Continuous light exposures
of rats for 100 days led to atresia of ovarian follicles due
to lack of preovulatory LH surge and resulted in cyst
formation (17). Although, corpora lutea were present in
the uniparous PCOS-induced group, but the absence of
corpus luteum is another attribute of PCOS in the current
study in the nulliparous rats, in accordance with a
previous report (26).However, the nulliparous group represented a better
PCOS model than the primiparous rats, but it is not clear
if gravidity can influence the occurrence of PCOS or
not. Consistent with the current finding, in the consistent
light model of PCOS, the PCOS criteria in the nulliparous
rats were more than the primiparous group. In
women, obesity would exacerbate the insulin resistance,
a predisposing factor for PCOS. It has been reported that
pregnancy can be a risk factor for obesity (27). Therefore,
it can be expected prevalence of PCOS increase
in the uniparous women. While, evidences showed that
nulliparous women are susceptible to PCOS (28). Therefore,
based on the current findings and the other published
reports it can indirectly conclude that increase
in gravidity may be associated with decreased PCOS,
although confirmation of it and knowing its mechanism
need further investigations.
Conclusion
The constant light model of PCOS induced decrease in
the gene expression of RFRP3 in the DMH that suggests
the decrease in RFRP3 reduces its inhibitory effect on
GnRH in the PCOS pathogenesis. The Continuous light
exposure model of PCOS in rats could trigger the creation
of phenotypic traits of PCOS with similar histopathologic
and hormonal phenomenon in human PCOS. Furthermore,
by removing exogenous androgen, this model can
be applied to hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian disorders in
PCOS studies.
Authors: Thomas C Chou; Thomas E Scammell; Joshua J Gooley; Stephanie E Gaus; Clifford B Saper; Jun Lu Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2003-11-19 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: M R Jafarzadeh Shirazi; M J Zamiri; M S Salehi; S Moradi; A Tamadon; M R Namavar; A Akhlaghi; K Tsutsui; A Caraty Journal: J Neuroendocrinol Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 3.627
Authors: A S L Caldwell; L J Middleton; M Jimenez; R Desai; A C McMahon; C M Allan; D J Handelsman; K A Walters Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2014-05-30 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Ricardo Azziz; Enrico Carmina; ZiJiang Chen; Andrea Dunaif; Joop S E Laven; Richard S Legro; Daria Lizneva; Barbara Natterson-Horowtiz; Helena J Teede; Bulent O Yildiz Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 52.329