Literature DB >> 29333478

A General Method for Intracellular Protein Delivery through 'E-tag' Protein Engineering and Arginine Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles.

Rubul Mout1, Vincent M Rotello1.   

Abstract

In this protocol, we describe a method for direct cytosolic protein delivery that avoids endosomal entrapment of the delivered proteins. We achieved this by tagging the desired protein with an oligo glutamic acid tag (E-tag), and subsequently using carrier gold nanoparticles to deliver these E-tagged proteins. When E-tagged proteins and nanoparticles were mixed, they formed nanoassemblies, which got fused to cell membrane upon incubation and directly released the E-tagged protein into cell cytosol. We used this method to deliver a wide variety of proteins with different sizes, charges, and functions in various cell lines (Mout et al., 2017). To use this protocol, the first step is to generate the required materials (gold nanoparticles, recombinant E-tagged proteins). Laboratory-synthesis of gold nanoparticles has been previously described (Yang et al., 2011). Desired E-tagged proteins can be cloned from the corresponding genes, and expressed and purified using standard laboratory procedures. We will use E-tagged green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a reference protein here. Users can simply insert an E-tag into their protein of interest, at either terminus. To achieve maximum delivery efficiency, we suggest users testing different length of E-tags. For example, we inserted E = 0 to 20 (E0 means no E-tag insertion, and E20 means 20 glutamic acids insertion in a row) to most of the proteins we tested, and screened for optimal E-tagged length for highest delivery efficiency. E10-tagged proteins gave us the highest delivery efficiency for most of the proteins (except for Cas9, where E20 tag showed highest delivery efficiency). Once these materials are ready, it takes about ~10 min to make the E-tagged protein and nanoparticle nanoassemblies, which are immediately used for delivery. Complete delivery (~100% for GFP-E10) is achieved in less than 3 h.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct cytosolic protein delivery; E-tagged protein; Intracellular protein delivery; Nanoparticles

Year:  2017        PMID: 29333478      PMCID: PMC5760992          DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bio Protoc        ISSN: 2331-8325


  8 in total

1.  Drug delivery using nanoparticle-stabilized nanocapsules.

Authors:  Xiao-Chao Yang; Bappaditya Samanta; Sarit S Agasti; Youngdo Jeong; Zheng-Jiang Zhu; Subinoy Rana; Oscar R Miranda; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  General Strategy for Direct Cytosolic Protein Delivery via Protein-Nanoparticle Co-engineering.

Authors:  Rubul Mout; Moumita Ray; Tristan Tay; Kanae Sasaki; Gulen Yesilbag Tonga; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 3.  In vitro and ex vivo strategies for intracellular delivery.

Authors:  Martin P Stewart; Armon Sharei; Xiaoyun Ding; Gaurav Sahay; Robert Langer; Klavs F Jensen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Efficient intracellular delivery of native proteins.

Authors:  Diego S D'Astolfo; Romina J Pagliero; Anita Pras; Wouter R Karthaus; Hans Clevers; Vikram Prasad; Robert Jan Lebbink; Holger Rehmann; Niels Geijsen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Potent delivery of functional proteins into Mammalian cells in vitro and in vivo using a supercharged protein.

Authors:  James J Cronican; David B Thompson; Kevin T Beier; Brian R McNaughton; Constance L Cepko; David R Liu
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 6.  Promises and pitfalls of intracellular delivery of proteins.

Authors:  Ailing Fu; Rui Tang; Joseph Hardie; Michelle E Farkas; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 4.774

7.  CRISPR-Cas9 delivery to hard-to-transfect cells via membrane deformation.

Authors:  Xin Han; Zongbin Liu; Myeong Chan Jo; Kai Zhang; Ying Li; Zihua Zeng; Nan Li; Youli Zu; Lidong Qin
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Protein delivery into live cells by incubation with an endosomolytic agent.

Authors:  Alfredo Erazo-Oliveras; Kristina Najjar; Laila Dayani; Ting-Yi Wang; Gregory A Johnson; Jean-Philippe Pellois
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 28.547

  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Genetic and Covalent Protein Modification Strategies to Facilitate Intracellular Delivery.

Authors:  Justin M Horn; Allie C Obermeyer
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 6.978

2.  In Vivo Editing of Macrophages through Systemic Delivery of CRISPR-Cas9-Ribonucleoprotein-Nanoparticle Nanoassemblies.

Authors:  Yi-Wei Lee; Rubul Mout; David C Luther; Yuanchang Liu; Laura Castellanos-García; Amy S Burnside; Moumita Ray; Gulen Yeşilbag Tonga; Joseph Hardie; Harini Nagaraj; Riddha Das; Erin L Phillips; Tristan Tay; Richard W Vachet; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  Adv Ther (Weinh)       Date:  2019-08-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.