Literature DB >> 2933340

In vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical safety and therapeutic efficacy of enoxacin in the treatment of patients with complicated urinary tract infections.

K G Naber, F Sörgel, F Gutzler, B Bartosik-Wich.   

Abstract

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of enoxacin, nalidixic acid, pipemidic acid, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and pefloxacin against isolates from 400 urological in-patients with complicated urinary tract infections (UTI) were determined by means of an agar dilution technique (10(4) cfu, multipointer). 28 patients (21 male, seven female) aged 36 to 84 years with complicated UTI due to sensitive bacteria were treated orally with 200 mg enoxacin b.i.d. for six to 14 days. Plasma and urine samples were collected from 19 patients, at intervals prior to and following a 400 mg dose of enoxacin, and enoxacin concentrations were determined by a high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. The MICs of enoxacin against all but one of the gram-negative isolates cultured from 265 urological patients were between 0.03 and 4 mg/l. The MICs against 134 gram-positive isolates were between 0.25 and 16 mg/l except for two strains of streptococci. At a concentration of 4 mg/l (8 mg/l), 90.3% (98%) of the total spectrum of isolates were inhibited by enoxacin. Of the quinolones tested, ciprofloxacin appeared to be the most active compound in vitro and cinoxacin the least active antimicrobial agent. The in vivo activity of enoxacin was comparable to that of norfloxacin, ofloxacin and pefloxacin. Oral administration of 400 mg of enoxacin to elderly patients resulted in peak serum concentrations between 0.7 and 6.3 mg/l (mean 3.6 mg/l) attained between 1.0 and 6.0 h following drug ingestion. The mean urinary recovery of parent drug within 24 h was 31.2% of the administered dose. 25 of 28 patients treated orally with enoxacin could be followed-up for five to 14 days after the end of treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2933340     DOI: 10.1007/BF01667215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  10 in total

1.  Enoxacin raises plasma theophylline concentrations.

Authors:  W J Wijnands; C L van Herwaarden; T B Vree
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-07-14       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  B Crump; R Wise; J Dent
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  The pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of norfloxacin.

Authors:  Z N Adhami; R Wise; D Weston; B Crump
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  The clinical pharmacokinetics and tolerance of enoxacin in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  R Wolf; R Eberl; A Dunky; N Mertz; T Chang; J R Goulet; J Latts
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  [Spectrum of pathogens in patients with urinary tract infections from a clinical viewpoint].

Authors:  K Naber; A Bauernfeind; G Dietlein
Journal:  MMW Munch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1983-05-20

6.  Serum and sputum concentrations of enoxacin after single oral dosing in a clinical and bacteriological study.

Authors:  B I Davies; F P Maesen; J P Teengs
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  In vitro antibacterial properties of AT-2266, a new pyridonecarboxylic acid.

Authors:  S Nakamura; A Minami; H Katae; S Inoue; J Yamagishi; Y Takase; M Shimizu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In-vitro activity of enoxacin (CL-919), a new quinoline derivative, compared with that of other antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  R Wise; J M Andrews; G Danks
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  In vitro activity of enoxacin, a quinolone carboxylic acid, compared with those of norfloxacin, new beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, and trimethoprim.

Authors:  N X Chin; H C Neu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of enoxacin.

Authors:  R Wise; R Lockley; J Dent; M Webberly
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.191

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  In vitro activity and concentrations in serum, urine, prostatic secretion and adenoma tissue of ofloxacin in urological patients.

Authors:  K G Naber; D Adam; F Kees
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of intravenous-to-oral enoxacin in elderly patients with complicated urinary tract infections.

Authors:  C R Marchbanks; D J Mikolich; K H Mayer; S H Zinner; M N Dudley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Finafloxacin in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract Infections.

Authors:  Max Taubert; Mark Lückermann; Andreas Vente; Axel Dalhoff; Uwe Fuhr
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  J S Wolfson; D C Hooper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Old Drugs with New Tricks: Efficacy of Fluoroquinolones to Suppress Replication of Flaviviruses.

Authors:  Stacey L P Scroggs; Christy C Andrade; Ramesh Chinnasamy; Sasha R Azar; Erin E Schirtzinger; Erin I Garcia; Jeffrey B Arterburn; Kathryn A Hanley; Shannan L Rossi
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 5.048

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.