| Literature DB >> 29333279 |
Karen M McCreesh1,2, Helen Purtill2,3, Alan E Donnelly2,4, Jeremy S Lewis1,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: Exercise imparts a load on tendon tissue that leads to changes in tendon properties. Studies suggest that loading immediately reduces tendon thickness, with a loss of this response in symptomatic tendinopathy. No studies investigating the response of tendon dimensions to load for the rotator cuff tendons exist. This study aimed to examine the short-term effect of loading on the thickness of the supraspinatus tendon and acromiohumeral distance those with and without rotator cuff tendinopathy.Entities:
Keywords: concentric; eccentric; exercise rehabilitation; shoulder; tendinopathy
Year: 2017 PMID: 29333279 PMCID: PMC5759726 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000279
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med ISSN: 2055-7647
Participant characteristics
| Controls n=20 | RC tendinopathy n=23 | |
| Age (years) | 43 (9.5) | 47 (12.8) |
| Sex | 10 F, 10 M | 11 F, 12 M |
| BMI | 27.5 (4.6) | 26 (3.5) |
| Symptom duration (months) | N/A | 13 (8.4) |
| NRS | N/A | 4 (1.4) |
| SPADI total | N/A | 25 (11.5) |
| Ultrasound | N/A | Supraspinatus tendinopathy=17 |
BMI, body mass index; F, female; M, male; N/A, not available; NRS, Numerical Pain Rating Scale; RC, rotator cuff; SPADI, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index.
Mean values of supraspinatus thickness and acromiohumeral distance for both groups and differences from baseline
| Mean (SD) | Mean difference from baseline (95% CI) | |
| Supraspinatus thickness (mm) | ||
| Pain group | ||
| Baseline | 5.60 (0.88) | |
| 1 hr | 5.97 (0.72) | 0.38 (0.19 to 0.57)* |
| 6hrs | 6.12 (0.77) | 0.53 (0.34 to 0.71) |
| 24 hrs | 5.78 (0.90) | 0.18 (0.02 to 0.35)* |
| Control group | ||
| Baseline | 4.96 (0.67) | |
| 1 hr | 4.86 (0.54) | −0.11 (−0.31 to 0.10) |
| 6 hrs | 4.77 (0.62) | −0.2 (−0.40 to 0.01) |
| 24 hrs | 4.91 (0.66) | −0.1 (−0.23 to 0.13) |
| Acromiohumeral distance (mm) | ||
| Pain group | ||
| Baseline | 10.04 (1.06) | |
| 1 hr | 8.96 (0.91) | 1.1 (0.85 to 1.33)† |
| 6 hrs | 9.44 (1.02) | 0.6 (0.35 to 0.86)† |
| 24 hrs | 9.84 (1.02) | 0.2 (0.01 to 0.39) |
| Control group | ||
| Baseline | 9.58 (1.19) | |
| 1 hr | 8.94 (1.19) | 0.64 (0.38 to 0.90)† |
| 6 hrs | 9.27 (1.01) | 0.31 (0.04 to 0.58)* |
| 24 hrs | 9.62 (1.17) | −0.04 (−0.25 to 1.63) |
1 hr= 1 hour postexercise; 6 hrs=6 hours postexercise; 24 hrs=24 hours postexercise.
*Statistically significant result.
†Statistically significant result with mean difference greater or equal to the minimal detectable difference.
Figure 1Occupation ratio (supraspinatus tendon/acromiohumeral distance%) at baseline (0 hour) and three subsequent time points of 1, 6 and 24 hours postexercise for (A) controls and (B) painful shoulders. RC, rotator cuff; hr, hour.