| Literature DB >> 29333089 |
Xueqing Kang1, Feng Wang1, Xiuwan Lan1, Xiaolong Li1, Shunxin Zheng1, Zhilue Lv1, Yuan Zhuang1, Yongxiang Zhao2, Sufang Zhou1,2.
Abstract
Objective: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors with a high rate of mortality. Our previous study shows the expression of calponin 2 (CNN2) is up-regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues, especially in metastatic ones. To better understand the role of CNN2 in HCC, RNA interference (RNAi) was used to explore its role in tumor growth and metastasis.Entities:
Keywords: CNN2; Hepatocellular Carcinoma; Molecular target therapy.; shRNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29333089 PMCID: PMC5765741 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.21113
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Figure 1The effect of shRNA on CNN2 knockdown. (A) Expressions of CNN2 mRNA are significantly down-regulated in SK-hep-1 cells treated with CNN2 shRNA compared with control group. (B) Expressions of CNN2 protein are significantly down-regulated in SK-hep-1 cells treated with CNN2 shRNA compared with control group ( < 0.001).
Figure 2The effects of CNN2 knockdown on cell migration and invasion. (A) The migration ability is significantly weakened in SK-hep-1 cells treated with CNN2 shRNA compared with control group. (B) The invasion ability is significantly weakened in SK-hep-1 cells treated with CNN2 shRNA compared with control group ( < 0.05, 0.01).
Figure 3The effect of CNN2 knockdown on cell proliferation. The proliferation ability is significantly weakened in SK-hep-1 cells treated with CNN2 shRNA compared with control group ( < 0.01, < 0.001).
Figure 4The effect of CNN2 knockdown on cell cycle. The distributions of G0/G1 phase are decreased and the distributions of S phase are increased in SK-hep-1 cells treated with CNN2 shRNA compared with control group ( < 0.01).
Figure 5The effect of CNN2 knockdown on xenograft tumor growth. (A) The tumor images represent excised tumors from each group. (B) Xenograft tumor growth was significantly inhibited in SK-hep-1 cells treated with CNN2 shRNA compared with control group. (C) The weight of tumor was lighter in SK-hep-1 cells treated with CNN2 shRNA compared with control group. (D) H&E staining of tissue section of tumor. (E) Tunel staining of tissue slices ( < 0.001).
Figure 6Immunohistochemical results. (A) Representative images from immunohistochemical analysis. (B) Integrated optical density of CNN2, MEK1/2, p-MEK1/2, ERK1/2, p-ERK1/2, AKT and p-AKT ( < 0.01).