Literature DB >> 29333077

Underwater endoclip closure after endoscopic resection for duodenal adenomas.

Yasushi Yamasaki1, Hiromitsu Kanzaki1, Yoshiro Kawahara1, Hiroyuki Okada1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29333077      PMCID: PMC5759606          DOI: 10.20524/aog.2017.0202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1108-7471


× No keyword cloud information.
Duodenal endoscopic resection remains challenging because of the high risk of adverse events [1]. Complete endoclip closure of mucosal defects can reduce delayed adverse events [2], but endoclip closure is sometimes difficult because the duodenal lumen is narrow and has a precipitous flexure. Additionally, insufflation during the procedure elevates the intraduodenal pressure and distends mucosal defects, resulting in great difficulty in the achievement of complete endoclip closure. Underwater conditions reportedly reduce the size of mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection [3]. In practice, we have also found that mucosal defects are small after duodenal endoscopic resection in underwater conditions. Thus, we applied underwater endoclip closure to mucosal defects after duodenal endoscopic resection. After 20-mm adenomas in the second portion of the duodenum were removed by underwater endoscopic mucosal resection using a 15-mm polypectomy snare (Captivator II; Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) (Fig. 1A), white light and narrow-band imaging endoscopy showed no residue. The mucosal defects were closed completely by endoclips (HX-610-090; Olympus, Tokyo) in four patients (100%). In underwater conditions, the pressure in the duodenal lumen remains low, which decreases the size of the mucosal defects after duodenal endoscopic resection (Fig. 1B). Additionally, the resection border floated up into the duodenal lumen, allowing us to easily close the mucosal defects after duodenal underwater endoscopic mucosal resection by endoclips in only a few minutes (Fig. 1 C, D; Video 1, supplementary material, online version). During all procedures, physiological saline was used to fill the duodenal lumen, and the air insufflation switch was turned off. No adverse events occurred after the procedure.
Figure 1

Underwater endoclip closure after duodenal underwater endoscopic mucosal resection. (A) A 20-mm adenoma was located at the second portion of the duodenum. (B) Mucosal defect after piecemeal underwater endoscopic mucosal resection. The resection borders floated upward. (C) Endoclip closure in underwater conditions. (D) Complete closure was achieved

Underwater endoclip closure after duodenal underwater endoscopic mucosal resection. (A) A 20-mm adenoma was located at the second portion of the duodenum. (B) Mucosal defect after piecemeal underwater endoscopic mucosal resection. The resection borders floated upward. (C) Endoclip closure in underwater conditions. (D) Complete closure was achieved
  3 in total

1.  Downsizing the target: the underwater closure technique.

Authors:  Gabriele Curcio; Antonino Granata; Dario Ligresti; Mario Traina
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Line-assisted complete closure of duodenal mucosal defects after underwater endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Yasushi Yamasaki; Yoji Takeuchi; Noriya Uedo; Noboru Hanaoka; Koji Higashino; Ryu Ishihara; Hiroyasu Iishi
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Delayed perforation: a hazardous complication of endoscopic resection for non-ampullary duodenal neoplasm.

Authors:  Takuya Inoue; Noriya Uedo; Takeshi Yamashina; Sachiko Yamamoto; Noboru Hanaoka; Yoji Takeuchi; Koji Higashino; Ryu Ishihara; Hiroyasu Iishi; Masaharu Tatsuta; Hidenori Takahashi; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Hiroaki Ohigashi
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 7.559

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.