Sidharth Totadri1, Amita Trehan1, Deepak Bansal1, Richa Jain1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Center, Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Unit, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Survival rates exceed 90% in Wilms' tumor (WT). Actinomycin-D (ACT-D) which is indispensable in the management of WT is associated with the development of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), a potentially fatal complication. AIMS: The aim is to study the presentation, management, and outcome of SOS complicating ACT-D administration in WT. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Retrospective file review conducted in a Pediatric Hematology-Oncology unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed and treated for WT from January 2012 to December 2015 were analyzed. SOS was diagnosed clinically, based on McDonalds criteria, requiring two of the following: jaundice, hepatomegaly and/or right upper quadrant pain, weight gain with or without ascites. RESULTS: Of 104 patients treated, SOS occurred in 5 (4.8%). Age: 6 months to 5 years, 3 were girls. Tumor involved left kidney in 3, right in 1 and a horseshoe kidney in 1. Histopathology was consistent with WT in 4 and clear cell sarcoma kidney in 1. One had pulmonary metastases. Three developed SOS preoperatively and two during adjuvant chemotherapy. None received radiotherapy. Clinical manifestations comprised of jaundice, hepatomegaly, ascites/weight gain, respiratory distress, hypotension, and encephalopathy. Laboratory findings included thrombocytopenia, elevated serum transaminases, and coagulopathy. Treatment included fluid restriction, broad spectrum antibiotics, and transfusional support. Two children received N-acetyl cysteine infusion. Defibrotide was administered to two patients. Four recovered and one succumbed to multi-organ failure. Two patients were safely re-challenged with 50% doses of ACT-D. CONCLUSIONS: SOS is a clinical diagnosis. Systematic supportive care can enable complete recovery. Under close monitoring, re-challenge of ACT-D can be performed in gradually escalating doses.
CONTEXT: Survival rates exceed 90% in Wilms' tumor (WT). Actinomycin-D (ACT-D) which is indispensable in the management of WT is associated with the development of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), a potentially fatal complication. AIMS: The aim is to study the presentation, management, and outcome of SOS complicating ACT-D administration in WT. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Retrospective file review conducted in a Pediatric Hematology-Oncology unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed and treated for WT from January 2012 to December 2015 were analyzed. SOS was diagnosed clinically, based on McDonalds criteria, requiring two of the following: jaundice, hepatomegaly and/or right upper quadrant pain, weight gain with or without ascites. RESULTS: Of 104 patients treated, SOS occurred in 5 (4.8%). Age: 6 months to 5 years, 3 were girls. Tumor involved left kidney in 3, right in 1 and a horseshoe kidney in 1. Histopathology was consistent with WT in 4 and clear cell sarcoma kidney in 1. One had pulmonary metastases. Three developed SOS preoperatively and two during adjuvant chemotherapy. None received radiotherapy. Clinical manifestations comprised of jaundice, hepatomegaly, ascites/weight gain, respiratory distress, hypotension, and encephalopathy. Laboratory findings included thrombocytopenia, elevated serum transaminases, and coagulopathy. Treatment included fluid restriction, broad spectrum antibiotics, and transfusional support. Two children received N-acetyl cysteine infusion. Defibrotide was administered to two patients. Four recovered and one succumbed to multi-organ failure. Two patients were safely re-challenged with 50% doses of ACT-D. CONCLUSIONS: SOS is a clinical diagnosis. Systematic supportive care can enable complete recovery. Under close monitoring, re-challenge of ACT-D can be performed in gradually escalating doses.
Contemporary 5-year survival rates exceed 90% in Wilms' tumor (WT).[1] Multidisciplinary treatment comprises of surgery and chemotherapy in all patients; and radiotherapy in Stage 3 and 4 disease.[1] Actinomycin-D (Act-D) is an integral part of chemotherapy, across all international protocols employed in WT.[12] Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), is a well-known serious complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).[3] However, chemotherapeutic agents such as Act-D as well as radiation can damage small hepatic venules and sinusoids, thus recapitulating SOS in nonHSCT patients.[45] The incidence of SOS ranges from 1.2% to 8% in children treated for WT.[4] It is also documented in other childhood malignancies such as rhabdomyosarcoma and medulloblastoma requiring Act-D as part of therapy.[678] Access to defibrotide therapy, which is utilized in SOS following HSCT, is often limited by availability and high cost in low-/middle-income countries.[3] Best possible supportive care can still offer a good chance of salvaging children with SOS.[5] This study describes a single center experience of diagnosing and managing SOS in children with WT with the feasibility of re-exposure to Act-D subsequent to complete recovery from SOS.
Materials and Methods
The study was conducted as a file review. All patients diagnosed and treated for WT/clear cell sarcoma of the kidney (CCSK) from January 2012 to December 2015 were included in the study. We treat patients as per the International Society of Paediatric Oncology Wilms' Tumour protocol (SIOP-WT2001).[2] Act-D is administered as a single dose slow intravenous bolus of 45 μg/kg. The dose was reduced to two-thirds in children weighing <12 kg and half in children aged <6 months. SOS was diagnosed clinically, in accordance with the modified McDonald criteria.[9] This required the presence of at least two of the following symptoms or signs: jaundice (serum total bilirubin >2 mg/dL), hepatomegaly and/or abdominal pain in the right upper quadrant, and 5% weight gain from baseline with or without ascites. A complete blood count, liver function tests [total serum bilirubin, direct serum bilirubin, serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and serum albumin] and renal function tests (blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine) and a coagulation profile (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and international normalized ratio) were done in all patients suspected to have SOS. Viral markers for hepatitis B virus surface antigen, anti-hepatitis C virus IgM, anti-hepatitis A virus IgM and anti-hepatitis E virus IgM were also done in all patients. Ultrasound abdomen with Doppler for portal venous blood flow was performed in all patients.
Results
Over a period of 3 years, 104 children were diagnosed with WT/CCSK (6 being CCSK). Five (4.8%) developed SOS while on therapy. Mean age was 3.3 years (range: 6 months to 5 years). Male to female ratio was 1.5:1. Tumors were left-sided in 3, right-sided in 1 and 1 patient had tumor arising from a horseshoe kidney. Staging: one patient had stage 4 disease, with metastases to the lungs; two stage 2; one stage 1 and one patient with non-metastatic disease (histopathological staging not known as he expired before surgery). Four patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with one patient undergoing a primary nephrectomy at another hospital. Features of SOS developed during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 3, and during adjuvant therapy in 2 patients. The median duration between the start of therapy and diagnosis of SOS was 6 weeks (range: 4–13). A median number of doses of Act-D received before developing SOS was 2 (range: 2–6). None of the patients received radiation.All patients had tender hepatomegaly and evidence of fluid accumulation (weight gain/ascites). Clinical jaundice, fever and recurrent vomiting were seen in 4. Central nervous system involvement in the form of drowsiness and altered sensorium was observed in 3. Respiratory distress with bilateral infiltrates on chest x-ray requiring oxygen support/ventilation ensued in 3, hypotensive shock necessitating inotropic support occurred in 3 and 1 patient developed acute renal failure requiring dialysis (clinical profile of patients summarized in Table 1). All patients had significant thrombocytopenia and prolonged prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time. Four patients each had conjugated hyperbilirubinemia, hypoalbuminemia, and serum transaminase elevated to above 5 times of the upper limit of normal [Table 2]. Ultrasound abdomen with Doppler assessment of portal and hepatic venous blood flow was performed in all patients. While four patients demonstrated evidence of mild to moderate ascites, reversed or attenuated venous blood flow was not perceived in any. Serology for viral hepatitis was negative in all patients.
Table 1
Clinical features, treatment and outcome of patients diagnosed with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome
Table 2
Salient laboratory investigations in patients clinically diagnosed with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (n=5)
Clinical features, treatment and outcome of patients diagnosed with sinusoidal obstruction syndromeSalient laboratory investigations in patients clinically diagnosed with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (n=5)Treatment was mainly supportive. Patients received restricted fluids at 80% of the total daily maintenance calculated by Holliday–Segar's formula. Strict input/output records were maintained. Furosemide at a dose of 0.5–1 mg/kg was administered every 8 to 12 hourly. Platelets and fresh frozen plasma were transfused for thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy. Broad spectrum antibiotics were administered to cover possible co-existing/super added infections. Albumin was infused in patients with serum albumin <2.5 g/dL and clinical evidence of edema. Specific measures targeted at hepatic protection/recovery were individualized for each patient, keeping the clinical status as well as available resources in mind. Two patients received N-acetyl cysteine as an intravenous (IV) infusion, at a loading dose of 140 mg/kg followed by 70 mg/kg every 6 hourly for 72 h. One patient was treated with pulse steroid therapy in the form of IV methyl prednisolone at a dose of 500 mg/m2 every 12 hourly for 6 doses, followed by gradual tapering and cessation over 1 week. Defibrotide has very limited availability in our country and is extremely expensive. Two of our patients received defibrotide at a dose of 6.25 mg/kg IV every 6 hourly, for 48 h. Two patients in addition received oral ursodeoxycholic acid 20–30 mg/kg/day in twice a day doses.One patient succumbed to SOS with multi-organ failure. There was a complete recovery in the other 4 patients within a median duration of 10 days (range: 4–26) from diagnosis of SOS. Two of them were re-exposed to Act-D, initially at 50% dose and gradually escalated to 100% while closely monitoring for recurrence of SOS. Act-D was replaced by doxorubicin in one patient at the discretion of the treating physician. The fifth patient (CCSK) did not require further Act-D as part of his high-risk adjuvant chemotherapy protocol.
Discussion
WT is a highly curable malignancy which requires relatively less intensive chemotherapy as compared to other childhood malignancies.[1] It is indeed unfortunate when children with WT develop life-threatening complications secondary to therapy. SOS or veno-occlusive disease is classically described as an early complication of HSCT, which follows injury and narrowing of terminal hepatic venules and sinusoids.[3] A cascade of hypercoagulable and proinflammatory pathways causes further damage, resulting in obstruction of hepatic venous outflow, portal hypertension, and multi-organ failure.[3] Act-D in isolation, or in combination with hepatic radiation can potentially damage the vascular endothelium and trigger SOS in children with WT.[45] In the SIOP-WT2001 trial a 3% incidence of SOS was observed among 583 patients with stage II/III intermediate risk histology WT.[10] The German Paediatric Oncology and Haematology Society reported a similar incidence of 4.8% in 481 patients with WT, while the United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group Wilms' Tumour Study observed a lower incidence of 1.4% among 355 children with WT.[1112] The incidence of 4.8%, in the present study, was comparable to incidence reported in the literature. The diagnosis is essentially clinical, the thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy inherent in SOS, precluding a biopsy. In a study of liver biopsies obtained at the time of nephrectomy in 91 patients, evidence of SOS was present in 41 (45.1%).[13] Merely 12 patients (13.2%) satisfied the clinical criteria for SOS, suggesting that clinical SOS may represent only the tip of the iceberg.[13]Proposed risk factors for Act-D induced SOS include younger age, right-sided tumors and radiotherapy.[51415] These were not evident in our study, reiterating that any child exposed to Act-D is at potential risk of developing SOS. Although clinically indistinguishable from post-HSCT SOS which carries a high risk of mortality, Act-D induced SOS is predominantly reversible with timely diagnosis and robust management.[314] Possible factors which contribute to the higher mortality and irreversibility in post-HSCT SOS include: pre-existent endothelial damage secondary to hematological malignancies such as leukemia/lymphoma, direct as well as indirect injury to the endothelium by chemotherapeutic agents and radiation administered as conditioning regimen, and depletion of hepatic antioxidant glutathione reserves by alkylating agents such as busulfan.[16] Further, it has been observed that endothelial progenitor cells (markers of the endogenous regenerative potential of the endothelium) remain decreased for up to 2 years following allogenic HSCT, whereas they increase following exposure to chemotherapeutic agents such as cyclophosphamide.[16] All children receiving Act-D as part of chemotherapy require sentient monitoring for symptoms/signs of SOS. Most major series have employed the modified McDonald's criteria to diagnose Act-D-induced SOS.[4911] The 3 criteria of jaundice, tender hepatomegaly, and/or weight gain/ascites were successfully applied to diagnose all the patients in the present study on a completely clinical basis. The clinical diagnosis is strongly supported by the presence of thrombocytopenia, conjugated hyperbilirubinemia and highly elevated serum transaminases on investigations.[14] Act-D induced SOS has also been referred to as hepatopathy-thrombocytopenia syndrome.[121417] Thrombocytopenia in SOS is usually isolated, as compared to chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression which causes concomitant neutropenia.[1418] All our patients had significant thrombocytopenia <50,000/μL. This may reflect consumption of circulating platelets by the intravascular coagulation.[18] Four patients each had conjugated hyperbilirubinemia and elevated serum transaminases in our study. Bilirubin levels were modestly elevated (mean = 4.2 mg/dL). A similar observation of “mediocre bilirubinemia” was observed by a Polish study.[5] In contrast, serum transaminases are elevated to more than 5 times upper limit of normal, with serum aspartate transaminase being higher than serum alanine transaminase.[451418] Findings on abdominal ultra-sonogram described in SOS include thickened gall bladder wall, reversed/attenuated portal venous blood flow and ascites.[4] Ascites alone was demonstrable in our patients. It is possible that presence of ascites obscured other findings in our patients.The cornerstone of management in Act-D-induced SOS is supportive care. Fluid restriction, intensive monitoring of fluid balance (input/output), appropriate use of diuretics, judicious transfusion of blood products, albumin infusion, and administration of broad spectrum antibiotics are important components of supportive care.[18] Vasoactive drug infusion, ventilation, renal replacement therapy may be required with the onset of multi-organ dysfunction. Besides supportive care, specific interventions are highly variable and are extrapolated from the management of post-HSCT SOS and fulminant liver failure due to other causes. Steroids, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, antithrombin, and inhaled nitric oxide have been used with varying results in post-HSCT SOS as well as Act-D-induced SOS.[451819] N-acetylcysteine has shown improvement in survival in fulminant hepatic failure secondary to other causes.[20] There are reports of the use of NAC in Act-D-induced SOS.[21] We used it in two patients who had signs of encephalopathy, both of whom recovered completely. Defibrotide has been shown to improve complete response rates as well as survival in severe SOS following HSCT and Act induced SOS with relatively lesser toxicity when compared to other drugs.[41722] It is currently approved by the FDA for use in post-HSCT SOS in both children and adults, at a dose of 6.25 mg/kg every 6 h given as a 2-hour intravenous infusion for a minimum period of 21 days.[23] We were unable to use the drug due to limited availability and exorbitant cost. We have managed our patients without defibrotide. Although it was given in 2 children, the duration was minimal. Mortality rate secondary to Act-D ranges from 0 to 10% in large series.[18] One among the 5 children in this analysis expired.Act-D can be safely re-exposed after complete recovery from SOS, starting at 50% dose and gradually escalating to full dose if tolerated well.[456] However, the decision is conscientious, and after severe, life-threatening episodes, certain physicians may prefer to avoid Act-D re-exposure.[18] In the study, two were safely re-exposed to Act-D while we consciously replaced further doses of Act-D with doxorubicin in another patient.
Conclusions
Act-D-induced SOS is a life-threatening complication during treatment for WT, which otherwise has an excellent prognosis. Diagnosis is clinical and supported by simple investigations such as blood count, liver function tests, and abdominal ultrasound. Supportive care can salvage the majority of patients, as it is reversible in most cases. Act-D can be re-exposed after complete recovery under close monitoring.
Authors: P Czauderna; K Katski; J Kowalczyk; A Kurylak; B Lopatka; G Skotnicka-Klonowicz; K Sawicz-Birkowska; J Godziński Journal: Eur J Pediatr Surg Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 2.191
Authors: Kathy Pritchard-Jones; Christophe Bergeron; Beatriz de Camargo; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Tomas Acha; Jan Godzinski; Foppe Oldenburger; Liliane Boccon-Gibod; Ivo Leuschner; Gordan Vujanic; Bengt Sandstedt; Jan de Kraker; Harm van Tinteren; Norbert Graf Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rishi S Kotecha; Amy Buckland; Marianne B Phillips; Catherine H Cole; Nicholas G Gottardo Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 1.289