Literature DB >> 29333004

DROSHA rs642321 Polymorphism Influence Susceptibility to Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Preliminary Report.

Mohammad Hashemi1,2, Seyed-Shahaboddin Hasani2, Majid Naderi3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It has been well known that the microRNA biogenesis is involved in the pathogenesis of various diseases. We investigated the possible association between DROSHA rs642321 variant and risk of acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We genotyped 75 children diagnosed with ALL and 115 age- and sex-matched children with no history of cancer of any type (as the control group) by the tetra amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction.
RESULTS: We found that DROSHA rs642321 C > T variant significantly decreased the risk of ALL in codominant (TT vs. CC: odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.14-0.80, P = 0.020) and dominant (TT + CT vs. CC: OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.27-0.94, P = 0.037) inheritance model tested. The rs642321 T allele was associated with protective against ALL (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.38-0.88, P = 0.011) in comparison with C allele.
CONCLUSION: The study findings revealed that DROSHA rs642321 variant decreased the risk of pediatrics ALL in an Iranian population. Larger sample sizes with different ethnicities are needed to validate our findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia; DROSHA; polymorphism

Year:  2017        PMID: 29333004      PMCID: PMC5759056          DOI: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_4_15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol        ISSN: 0971-5851


Introduction

Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy in childhood, and it is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in childhood. Although the pathogenesis of the disease is not fully understood, it is known that genetic polymorphisms play a critical role in ALL development.[12] MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of single-stranded, small noncoding RNA molecules, which are approximately 22 nucleotides in length.[3] They are involved in regulation of gene expression through binding to the 3'untranslated region (3'UTR) of target mRNAs, resulting in mRNA degradation or translational inhibition. It is now clear that miRNAs contribute to most diverse biological processes such as differentiation, cell proliferation, and apoptosis.[45] Besides, miRNAs can function as either oncogenes or tumor suppressors and play an important role in the pathogenesis of cancer.[67] Biosynthesis of miRNAs involves various miRNA machinery genes and occurs in multiple steps. RNA polymerase II produces primary miRNA (~500–3000 nucleotides), which is processed by a multiprotein complex that includes DROSHA to form a precursor miRNA hairpin (~60–100 nucleotides, pre-miRNA). Then, pre-miRNA transported to the cytoplasm by Ran GTPase which subsequently processed by DICER1 to generate a single strand mature miRNA.[891011] The roles of miRNAs and miRNA biosynthesis pathway genes have been reported in cancers.[121314151617] Several studies have shown the association between genetic polymorphisms in the miRNAs biogenesis genes and risk of various cancers.[151819202122] In this study, for the first time, we evaluated the impact of DROSHA rs642321 polymorphism on risk of childhood ALL in a sample of Iranian population.

Materials and Methods

Patients

In this case–control study, we recruit 75 children diagnosed with ALL and 115 age- and sex-matched healthy children in a southeast Iranian population. The study design and the enrolment procedure have been described previously.[2324] Ethical approvals for recruitment were obtained from Local Ethics Committee of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, and informed consent was obtained from parents of patients and healthy individuals in accordance with our institutional guidelines. Peripheral blood sample was collected in ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid-containing tubes from patients and healthy controls and DNA were extracted using salting out method as described previously.[25]

Genotyping

We used tetra amplification refractory mutation system – polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which is a simple and rapid method for detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs),[26272829] for genotyping DROSHA rs642321 polymorphism. We used four primers, two outer primers (forward outer: 5′-AAAGCTATAAACCCTCCTCCTTCCTGC-3′, reverse outer: 5′-CCCAGATTGTGACCCTAGACTTTCAATT-3′) and two allele-specific internal primers (forward inner [T allele]: 5′-CCCCTTCTCCCATTAGCCAATTACTT-3′, reverse inner [C allele]: 5′-GTGTTTTGTAGAAGGAATCCGTTTACCG-3′). In each 0.20 ml PCR reaction tube, 1 μl of genomic DNA (~100 ng/ml), 1 μl of each primer (10 μM), 10 μl of 2 × Prime Taq Premix (Genet Bio, Korea) and 5 μl ddH2O were added. Amplification was done with an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 30 s at 72°C with a final step at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were verified on a 2.5% agarose gel contained 0.5 μg/ml ethidium bromide, and photographs were taken [Figure 1]. Product sizes were 245 bp for T allele, 294 bp for C allele, and 486 bp for the two outer primers (control band). To verify genotyping quality, all polymorphisms in random samples were re-genotyped.
Figure 1

Agarose gel electrophoresis pattern of tetra amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction (T-ARMS-PCR) for detection of DROSHA rs642321 polymorphism. Product sizes were 245 bp for T allele, 294 bp for C allele, and 486 bp for the two outer primers. M: DNA marker; Lanes 1,2: rs642321 CC; Lanes 3,4: rs642321 CT; Lane 5: rs642321 TT

Agarose gel electrophoresis pattern of tetra amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction (T-ARMS-PCR) for detection of DROSHA rs642321 polymorphism. Product sizes were 245 bp for T allele, 294 bp for C allele, and 486 bp for the two outer primers. M: DNA marker; Lanes 1,2: rs642321 CC; Lanes 3,4: rs642321 CT; Lane 5: rs642321 TT

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software for Windows, version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL, USA). Student's t-test and ANOVA was used to test for differences in continuous variables. The categorical data were analyzed using χ2 test. The values of P < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was determined using the χ2 test in both cases and controls.

Results

In this study, we genotyped DROSHA rs642321 polymorphism in 75 ALL children and 115 healthy children. The findings demonstrated that DROSHA rs642321 C > T variant significantly decreased the risk of ALL in codominant (TT vs. CC: odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.14–0.80, P =0.020) and dominant (TT + CT vs. CC: OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.27–0.94, P =0.037) inheritance model tested. The rs642321 T allele was associated with protective against ALL (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.38–0.88, P = 0.011) in comparison with C allele [Table 1]. The DROSHA rs642321 genotypes in cases and controls were in HWE (χ2 = 0.002, P = 0.966, and χ2 = 0.008, P = 0.925, respectively).
Table 1

Genotypic and allelic frequency of DROSHA rs642321 polymorphism in childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia and control subjects

Genotypic and allelic frequency of DROSHA rs642321 polymorphism in childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia and control subjects We analyzed possible association between DROSHA rs642321 variant and patients' demographic and clinical data. As shown in Table 2, no association was found between ages of patients, white blood cell count, hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, sex, organomegaly, lymphadenopathy as well as cerebrospinal fluid involvement and rs642321 genotypes.
Table 2

Association of DROSHA rs642321gene polymorphism with demographic and clinical features of childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia patients

Association of DROSHA rs642321gene polymorphism with demographic and clinical features of childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia patients

Discussion

In recent years, it has been revealed that miRNAs are important components of complex gene regulatory networks. miRNA are a class of small noncoding RNA molecules involved in a variety of cellular functions.[5] SNPs in miRNA sequences, miRNA target genes as well as miRNA biogenesis may affect the miRNAs regulation.[17183031] In this study, we aimed to find out the impact of DROSHA rs642321 polymorphism on childhood ALL. The study findings showed an association between DROSHA rs642321 and ALL. The DROSHA rs642321 TT as well as TT + CT genotype decreased the risk of ALL in comparison with CC genotype. The rs642321 T allele was significantly associated with protective against ALL. Gutierrez-Caminors et al.[31] have found that DROSHA rs10035440 variant increased the risk of pediatric ALL. DROSHA is a member of RNase III superfamily and playing a pivotal role in the pathway of miRNAs biogenesis.[3233] Sung et al.[20] evaluated the impact of rs644236, rs874332, rs7737174, rs10461898, rs11748548, and rs16901096 polymorphisms of DROSHA on breast cancer and found no significant association between these variants and breast cancer risk. They reported that DROSHA rs644236 TT genotype as well as rs7737174 AA genotype was associated with breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women.[20] Weng et al.[21] have found an association between DROSHA rs10719 variant and risk of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Lin et al.[34] stated the haplotypes of DROSHA and DICER, but not individual variant, is associated with altered survival and recurrence of renal cell carcinoma. Yuan et al.[18] have found no significant association between DROSHA rs642321 polymorphism and bladder cancer risk, while rs10719T > C variant increased the risk of the disease in a Chinese population. The aberrant expression of DROSHA at mRNA or protein level has been reported in numerous types of cancer, including skin cancer,[35] cervical cancer,[36] ovarian cancer,[15] breast cancer,[37] nonsmall-cell lung cancer,[38] and neuroblastoma.[39]

Conclusion

The study finding showed that rs642321 variant located in DROSHA 3'UTR decreased the risk of childhood ALL. The association and functional study are necessary to certify our result.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  39 in total

Review 1.  The functions of animal microRNAs.

Authors:  Victor Ambros
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight?

Authors:  Witold Filipowicz; Suvendra N Bhattacharyya; Nahum Sonenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Expression levels of the microRNA processing enzymes Drosha and dicer in epithelial skin cancer.

Authors:  Michael Sand; Thilo Gambichler; Marina Skrygan; Daniel Sand; Nina Scola; Peter Altmeyer; Falk G Bechara
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  microRNA signature and expression of Dicer and Drosha can predict prognosis and delineate risk groups in neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Ruey-Jen Lin; You-Chin Lin; Jeremy Chen; Huan-Hsien Kuo; Yuan-Yan Chen; Mitchell B Diccianni; Wendy B London; Chih-Hao Chang; Alice L Yu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Dysregulated expression of dicer and drosha in breast cancer.

Authors:  Min Yan; Hong-Yan Huang; Ting Wang; Yi Wan; Shu-De Cui; Zhen-Zhen Liu; Qing-Xia Fan
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.201

6.  Hsa-miR-196a2 polymorphism increases the risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Chinese children.

Authors:  Na Tong; Bin Xu; Danni Shi; Mulong Du; Xin Li; Xiaojing Sheng; Meilin Wang; Haiyan Chu; Yongjun Fang; Jie Li; Dongmei Wu; Zhengdong Zhang
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing.

Authors:  Yoontae Lee; Chiyoung Ahn; Jinju Han; Hyounjeong Choi; Jaekwang Kim; Jeongbin Yim; Junho Lee; Patrick Provost; Olof Rådmark; Sunyoung Kim; V Narry Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Dicer, Drosha, and outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  William M Merritt; Yvonne G Lin; Liz Y Han; Aparna A Kamat; Whitney A Spannuth; Rosemarie Schmandt; Diana Urbauer; Len A Pennacchio; Jan-Fang Cheng; Alpa M Nick; Michael T Deavers; Alexandra Mourad-Zeidan; Hua Wang; Peter Mueller; Marc E Lenburg; Joe W Gray; Samuel Mok; Michael J Birrer; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Robert L Coleman; Menashe Bar-Eli; Anil K Sood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Nuclear export of microRNA precursors.

Authors:  Elsebet Lund; Stephan Güttinger; Angelo Calado; James E Dahlberg; Ulrike Kutay
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The expression of Dicer and Drosha in matched normal tissues, tumours and lymph node metastases in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Kelly A Avery-Kiejda; Stephen G Braye; John F Forbes; Rodney J Scott
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  2 in total

1.  Influence of variants of the drosha, mir499a, and mir938 genes on susceptibility to acute lymphoblastic leukemia in an admixed population from the brazilian amazon.

Authors:  Tatiane Piedade de Souza; Darlen Cardoso de Carvalho; Alayde Viera Wanderley; Sweny Marinho Fernandes; Juliana Carla Gomes Rodrigues; Amanda Cohen-Paes; Marianne Rodrigues Fernandes; Fernando Augusto Rodrigues Mello Junior; Lucas Favacho Pastana; Lui Wallacy Morikawa Souza Vinagre; Artur Luiz da Costa Silva; Paulo Pimentel de Assumpção; Sidney Santos; André Salim Khayat; Ney Pereira Carneiro Dos Santos
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 2.  Genetics of blood malignancies among Iranian population: an overview.

Authors:  Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan; Amir Sadra Zangouei; Seyed Mohammad Hosseinirad; Majid Mojarrad; Meysam Moghbeli
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.644

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.