Jonas Egeter1, Katharina Hüfner2, Monika Sztankay1, Bernhard Holzner1, Barbara Sperner-Unterweger1. 1. Medical University of Innsbruck, Department for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Austria. 2. Medical University of Innsbruck, Department for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Austria. Electronic address: katharina.huefner@i-med.ac.at.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can be part of an electronic routine outcome monitoring (eROM). eROM can improve patient involvement, treatment outcomes and simplify scientific data assessment. Available studies on eROM focus on its evaluation only and lack a detailed description of the prior implementation procedure. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to implement an eROM assessment at a division of Psychosomatic Medicine and provide a detailed description of the implementation procedure. METHODS: According to the Replicating Effective Program concept the project consisted of 4 phases: pre-condition (1), pre-implementation (2), implementation (3) and maintenance and evolution (4) mainly focusing the description of the implementation procedure and a short evaluation. RESULTS: We describe the actions taken during the implementation procedure and steps which were taken to overcome identified barriers. All decisions were carried out based on the Participatory Action Research process. A core set consisting of sociodemographic and clinical data and a comprehensive questionnaire battery covering symptoms, functioning parameters and psychological constructs was implemented. In total 164 patients, took part in the eROM assessment from June 2015 to December 2016. The evaluation showed that eROM was appreciated by health-care professionals (85.2%) and patients (70.2%) alike. The majority of patients (89.4%) and health-care professionals (85.7%) experienced no delays in daily clinical routine due to eROM. CONCLUSION: The detailed description of the implementation process can guide institutions planning to implement eROM into their daily clinical routine. Focusing scientific efforts on the implementation process is essential since this influences all further steps such as evaluation and acceptance.
BACKGROUND:Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can be part of an electronic routine outcome monitoring (eROM). eROM can improve patient involvement, treatment outcomes and simplify scientific data assessment. Available studies on eROM focus on its evaluation only and lack a detailed description of the prior implementation procedure. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to implement an eROM assessment at a division of Psychosomatic Medicine and provide a detailed description of the implementation procedure. METHODS: According to the Replicating Effective Program concept the project consisted of 4 phases: pre-condition (1), pre-implementation (2), implementation (3) and maintenance and evolution (4) mainly focusing the description of the implementation procedure and a short evaluation. RESULTS: We describe the actions taken during the implementation procedure and steps which were taken to overcome identified barriers. All decisions were carried out based on the Participatory Action Research process. A core set consisting of sociodemographic and clinical data and a comprehensive questionnaire battery covering symptoms, functioning parameters and psychological constructs was implemented. In total 164 patients, took part in the eROM assessment from June 2015 to December 2016. The evaluation showed that eROM was appreciated by health-care professionals (85.2%) and patients (70.2%) alike. The majority of patients (89.4%) and health-care professionals (85.7%) experienced no delays in daily clinical routine due to eROM. CONCLUSION: The detailed description of the implementation process can guide institutions planning to implement eROM into their daily clinical routine. Focusing scientific efforts on the implementation process is essential since this influences all further steps such as evaluation and acceptance.