| Literature DB >> 29332445 |
Yong-Cheol Lee1, Jiwon Lee1, Je-Do Son1, Jae-Yoon Lee1, Hyun-Chang Kim1.
Abstract
Objective The GlideScope® videolaryngoscope provides a good view of the glottis. However, directing and inserting an endotracheal tube is sometimes difficult during intubation with the GlideScope®. In this study, we compared two GlideScope® stylet angulations (90° vs. 70°) in terms of the time to intubation. Methods In total, 162 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the 90 group ( n = 79), a 90° stylet was used. In the 70 group ( n = 78), a 70° stylet was used. The time to intubation was recorded. The number of intubation attempts was assessed. Results The time to intubation was significantly shorter in the 70 than 90 group [26.0 (23.0-32.0) vs. 37.0 (30.0-43.0) s, respectively]. The first-time intubation success rate was significantly higher and the number of failed intubations was significantly lower in the 70 than 90 group (100% vs. 87% and 0% vs. 6%, respectively). Conclusions This investigation suggests that a 70° angle stylet is superior to a 90° angle stylet for GlideScope® intubation. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02547064.Entities:
Keywords: Laryngoscopic view; difficult airway algorithm; grading; laryngoscopy complications; stylet angulation; time to intubation
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29332445 PMCID: PMC6091841 DOI: 10.1177/0300060517741065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Figure 1.(a) The two endotracheal tubes (ETTs) with stylets are shown: 70° (top) and 90° (bottom). The ETT with the 70° angle stylet was prepared as follows: the ETT was bent by 60° at a point 10 cm from its distal end and by an additional 10° at a point 6 cm from its distal end to facilitate directing the ETT distal tip toward the vocal cords. The proximal portion of the ETT was formed in the shape of the GlideScope® blade until the point of the handle was reached. The ETT with the 90° angle stylet was bent at a point 8 cm from its distal end. (b) The ETT with the 70° angle stylet and an illustration of the GlideScope® blade.
Figure 2.CONSORT diagram showing the flow of patients through the phases of the trial.
Baseline patient characteristics
| 70° group( | 90° group( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 57 ± 16 | 58 ± 13 |
| Male sex | 46 (59) | 41 (55) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25 ± 4 | 24 ± 3 |
| Thyromental distance (mm) | 78.5 ± 24.5 | 79.1 ± 23.6 |
| Mallampati score(I/II/III/IV) | 32 (41)/33 (42)/8 (10)/6 (8) | 36 (46)/25 (32)/10 (13)/7 (9) |
| CL grade(I/II/III/IV) | 68 (86)/9 (11)/2 (3)/0 (0) | 70 (89)/7 (9)/1 (2)/0 (0) |
| POGO score (%) | 93 ± 21 | 91 ± 25 |
| Anaesthesia time (min) | 162 ± 85 | 178 ± 121 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or n (%).
BMI, body mass index; CL, Cormack–Lehane; POGO, percentage of glottis opening.
Figure 3.Haemodynamic variables before and 2 min after GlideScope® intubation.
Intubation data of patients intubated by the GlideScope® using a 70° or 90° angle stylet
| 70 group( | 90 group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Time to intubation (s) | 26.0 (23.0–32.0) | 37.0 (30.0–43.0) | <0.001 |
| Intubation difficulty score | 10 (0–30) | 30 (10–50) | 0.003 |
| First-time success rate | 79 (100) | 68 (87) | 0.001 |
| Failure rate | 0 (0) | 6 (6.4) | 0.028 |
| External manipulation | 3 (4) | 14 (18) | 0.005 |
Data are presented as median (interquartile range), mean ± standard deviation, or n (%). The time to intubation and the intubation difficulty score were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test after the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Z test.
Figure 4.Kaplan–Meier plot of time to intubation for patients using the 70° or 90° stylet. The log-rank test showed a significant difference between the groups (P < 0.001).
Complications related to ETT intubation by GlideScope® using the 70° vs. 90° angle stylet
| 70 group ( | 90 group( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Larynx injury | 0 (0) | 5 (6) | 0.028 |
| Blood on ETT | 15 (19) | 14 (18) | 0.867 |
| NPS of sore throat at 1 h postoperatively | 13 ± 25 | 16 ± 27 | 0.597 |
| NPS of sore throat at 24 h postoperatively | 8 ± 18 | 10 ± 20 | 0.421 |
Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation.
ETT, endotracheal tube; NPS, numeric pain score