Literature DB >> 29332315

Comparison of treatment strategies for femoro-popliteal disease: A network meta-analysis.

Edward Koifman1, Michael J Lipinski1, Kyle Buchanan1, Won Yu Kang1, Ricardo O Escarcega1, Ron Waksman1, Nelson L Bernardo1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare treatment strategies in a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a prevalent morbidity that is treated with various strategies.
METHODS: We performed a MEDLINE search for randomized studies comparing at least 2 treatment strategies, including bypass surgery, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloons, stents, covered stents, drug-eluting stents (DES), and drug-coated balloons (DCB), in patients with native femoro-popliteal disease. Mixed treatment comparison model generation was performed to directly and indirectly compare the strategies in terms of restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) presented as odds ratios (OR, [95% credible intervals]).
RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies with 4,820 patients were included in the present study. PTA was the largest group with 1,900 patients, followed by DCB (n = 1,343), bare metal stents (n = 941), covered stents (n = 304), DES (n = 236), and bypass (n = 92). Mean age was 68 ± 9 years, 64% were male, 37% diabetic, and 55% smokers. Mean lesion length was 77 ± 44 mm, and 39% were total occlusions. Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model demonstrated all treatments were significantly better than, or had a trend toward superiority over, PTA, with DCB ranking well in both restenosis (OR = 0.29, [0.17-0.47]) and TLR (OR = 0.31, [0.20-0.46]). Nonetheless, none of the therapies showed superiority in terms of survival or amputations.
CONCLUSION: Treatment of femoro-popliteal disease has significantly evolved in recent years, with higher rates of patency and freedom from TLR. However, the utility of these treatment strategies in terms of reduction of amputations and overall survival remains in question.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  outcome; peripheral artery disease; target lesion revascularization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29332315     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  3 in total

1.  Long-Term Clinical Effectiveness of a Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions.

Authors:  John A Laird; Peter A Schneider; Michael R Jaff; Marianne Brodmann; Thomas Zeller; D Chris Metzger; Prakash Krishnan; Dierk Scheinert; Antonio Micari; Hong Wang; Michele Masters; Gunnar Tepe
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 6.546

2.  Peripheral Artery Disease Intervention: Drug-Coated Balloon vs Drug-Eluting Stent, A Long-Term Comparison.

Authors:  Nathan Marzlin; M Fuad Jan; Louie Kostopoulos; Ana Cristina Perez Moreno; Tanvir Bajwa; Suhail Q Allaqaband
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 1.776

3.  Paclitaxel exposure: Long-term safety and effectiveness of a drug-coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials.

Authors:  Peter A Schneider; Marianne Brodmann; Laura Mauri; John Laird; Yoshimitsu Soga; Antonio Micari; Gary Ansel; Mehdi H Shishehbor; Prakash Krishnan; Qi Gao; Kenneth Ouriel; Thomas Zeller
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.