Yi Hua1, Andrew P Voorhees1, Ian A Sigal1,2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. 2. Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: To model the sensitivity of the optic nerve head (ONH) biomechanical environment to acute variations in IOP, cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP), and central retinal artery blood pressure (BP). Methods: We extended a previously published numerical model of the ONH to include 24 factors representing tissue anatomy and mechanical properties, all three pressures, and constraints on the optic nerve (CON). A total of 8340 models were studied to predict factor influences on 98 responses in a two-step process: a fractional factorial screening analysis to identify the 16 most influential factors, followed by a response surface methodology to predict factor effects in detail. Results: The six most influential factors were, in order: IOP, CON, moduli of the sclera, lamina cribrosa (LC) and dura, and CSFP. IOP and CSFP affected different aspects of ONH biomechanics. The strongest influence of CSFP, more than twice that of IOP, was on the rotation of the peripapillary sclera. CSFP had similar influence on LC stretch and compression to moduli of sclera and LC. On some ONHs, CSFP caused large retrolamina deformations and subarachnoid expansion. CON had a strong influence on LC displacement. BP overall influence was 633 times smaller than that of IOP. Conclusions: Models predict that IOP and CSFP are the top and sixth most influential factors on ONH biomechanics. Different IOP and CSFP effects suggest that translaminar pressure difference may not be a good parameter to predict biomechanics-related glaucomatous neuropathy. CON may drastically affect the responses relating to gross ONH geometry and should be determined experimentally.
Purpose: To model the sensitivity of the optic nerve head (ONH) biomechanical environment to acute variations in IOP, cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP), and central retinal artery blood pressure (BP). Methods: We extended a previously published numerical model of the ONH to include 24 factors representing tissue anatomy and mechanical properties, all three pressures, and constraints on the optic nerve (CON). A total of 8340 models were studied to predict factor influences on 98 responses in a two-step process: a fractional factorial screening analysis to identify the 16 most influential factors, followed by a response surface methodology to predict factor effects in detail. Results: The six most influential factors were, in order: IOP, CON, moduli of the sclera, lamina cribrosa (LC) and dura, and CSFP. IOP and CSFP affected different aspects of ONH biomechanics. The strongest influence of CSFP, more than twice that of IOP, was on the rotation of the peripapillary sclera. CSFP had similar influence on LC stretch and compression to moduli of sclera and LC. On some ONHs, CSFP caused large retrolamina deformations and subarachnoid expansion. CON had a strong influence on LC displacement. BP overall influence was 633 times smaller than that of IOP. Conclusions: Models predict that IOP and CSFP are the top and sixth most influential factors on ONH biomechanics. Different IOP and CSFP effects suggest that translaminar pressure difference may not be a good parameter to predict biomechanics-related glaucomatous neuropathy. CON may drastically affect the responses relating to gross ONH geometry and should be determined experimentally.
Authors: Andrew J Feola; Jerry G Myers; Julia Raykin; Lealem Mulugeta; Emily S Nelson; Brian C Samuels; C Ross Ethier Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Chandrakumar Balaratnasingam; William H Morgan; Louise Bass; Graeme Matich; Stephen J Cringle; Dao-Yi Yu Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Lyndon da Cruz; Christos Bergeles; Zisos Mitros; Seyedmohammadhadi Sadati; Carlo Seneci; Edward Bloch; Konrad Leibrandt; Mohsen Khadem Journal: IEEE Robot Autom Lett Date: 2020-06-25
Authors: Ziyi Zhu; Susannah Waxman; Bo Wang; Jacob Wallace; Samantha E Schmitt; Elizabeth Tyler-Kabara; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Joel S Schuman; Matthew A Smith; Gadi Wollstein; Ian A Sigal Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Yi Hua; Andrew P Voorhees; Ning-Jiun Jan; Bingrui Wang; Susannah Waxman; Joel S Schuman; Ian A Sigal Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Bin Yang; Ning-Jiun Jan; Bryn Brazile; Andrew Voorhees; Kira L Lathrop; Ian A Sigal Journal: J Biophotonics Date: 2018-05-06 Impact factor: 3.390