Literature DB >> 29331622

Value of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance After 1 Yr Follow-up.

Esther Hendrika Johanna Hamoen1, Caroline M A Hoeks2, Diederik M Somford3, Inge M van Oort4, Henk Vergunst3, Jorg R Oddens5, Geert A Smits6, Leonard P Bokhorst7, J Alfred Witjes4, Maroeska M Rovers8, Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa9, Jelle O Barentsz10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) aims to reduce overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer (PC). Incorporating multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) and MR-guided biopsy (MRGB) in an AS protocol might contribute to more accurate identification of AS candidates.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of 3T mp-MRI and MRGB in PC patients on AS at inclusion and after 12-mo follow-up. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with cT1c-cT2 PC, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤10ng/ml, PSA density <0.2ng/ml/ml, and Gleason scores (GSs) of ≤6 and ≤2 positive biopsy cores were included and followed in an AS protocol including mp-MRI and MRGB. The mp-MRI and MRGB were performed at <3 and 12 mo after diagnosis. Reclassification was defined as GS >6, >2 positive cores at repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUSGB), presence of PC in >3 separate cancer foci upon both MRGB and TRUSGB, or cT3 tumor on mp-MRI. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Reclassification rates, treatment after discontinuation, and outcome on radical prostatectomy after discontinuing AS were reported. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of reclassification after 1 yr. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: From 2009 to 2013, a total of 111 of 158 patients were consecutively and prospectively included. Around initial diagnosis, 36 patients were excluded from the study protocol; mp-MRI+MRGB reclassified 25/111 (23%) patients, and 11 patients were excluded at own request. Reasons for reclassification were as follows: GS upgrade (15/25, 60%); cT3 disease (3/25, 12%); suspicion of bone metastases (1/25, 4%); and multifocal disease upon MRGB (6/25, 24%). Repeat examinations after 1 yr showed reclassification in 33/75 patients (44%). Reasons were the following: GS upgrade upon TRUSGB (9/33, 27%); volume progression upon TRUSGB (9/33, 27%); cT3 disease upon mp-MRI (1/33, 3%); GS upgrade upon MRGB (1/33, 3%); volume progression upon MRGB (1/33, 3%); multifocal disease upon MRGB (2/33, 6%); and upgrade or upstage upon both TRUSGB and MRGB (10/33, 30%). On logistic regression analysis, the presence of cancer at initial mp-MRI and MRGB examinations was the only predictor of reclassification after 1 yr (odds ratio 5.9, 95% confidence interval 2.0-17.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Although mp-MRI and MRGB are of additional value in the evaluation of PC patients on AS, the value of mp-MRI after 1 yr was limited. As a considerable percentage of GS ≥7 PC after 1 yr was detected only by TRUSGB, TRUSGB cannot be omitted yet. PATIENT
SUMMARY: More aggressive tumors are detected if low-risk prostate cancer patients are additionally monitored by magnetic resonance imaging. However, some high-grade tumors are detected only by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.
Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; Biopsy; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer

Year:  2018        PMID: 29331622     DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Focus        ISSN: 2405-4569


  5 in total

Review 1.  Multiparametric MRI in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: An Overview and a Practical Approach.

Authors:  Chau Hung Lee; Teck Wei Tan; Cher Heng Tan
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.500

2.  Four-year outcomes from a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based active surveillance programme: PSA dynamics and serial MRI scans allow omission of protocol biopsies.

Authors:  Kevin Michael Gallagher; Edward Christopher; Andrew James Cameron; Scott Little; Alasdair Innes; Gill Davis; Julian Keanie; Prasad Bollina; Alan McNeill
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Predictors of adverse pathology on radical prostatectomy specimen in men initially enrolled in active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lars Björnebo; Henrik Olsson; Tobias Nordström; Fredrik Jäderling; Henrik Grönberg; Martin Eklund; Anna Lantz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biomarkers in Active Surveillance Protocols - Results From the Prospective Stockholm3 Active Surveillance Trial (STHLM3AS).

Authors:  Henrik Olsson; Tobias Nordström; Fredrik Jäderling; Lars Egevad; Hari T Vigneswaran; Magnus Annerstedt; Henrik Grönberg; Martin Eklund; Anna Lantz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Two Decades of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Single-Center Cohort: Favorable Outcomes after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate.

Authors:  Sarah Hagmann; Venkat Ramakrishnan; Alexander Tamalunas; Marc Hofmann; Moritz Vandenhirtz; Silvan Vollmer; Jsmea Hug; Philipp Niggli; Antonio Nocito; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Kurt Lehmann; Lukas John Hefermehl
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.